green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Greensboro Lumber Co. v. Georgia Power Co.
See Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District v. Federal Power Commission, 391 F.2d 470, 477 (D.C.Cir.) cert. denied, 393 U.S. 857 , 89 S.Ct. 104 , 21 L.Ed.2d 126 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Richard Coppola
See Courtney v. United States, 390 F.2d 521 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 857 , 89 S.Ct. 98 , 21 L.Ed.2d 126 (1968) and Rule 513(a) of the proposed Federal Rules of Evidence.
cited
Cited "see"
Alex Reizenstein v. Maurice Sigler
See Logner v. North Carolina, 260 F.Supp. 970 (N.C.1966), aff’d, 392 F.2d 222 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 857 , 89 S.Ct. 110 , 21 L.Ed.2d 126 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas John Morris, Sr.
Tallo v. United States, 344 F.2d 467, 469-70 (1st Cir.1965); San Fratello v. United States, 343 F.2d 711, 712 (5th Cir.1965) (motion for rehearing); see also Courtney v. United States, 390 F.2d 521, 528 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 857 , 89 S.Ct. 98 , 21 L.Ed.2d 126 (1968) (reversing conviction because the district court erred in requiring the marital privilege to be asserted before the jury, if at all, and allowing prosecutorial comment on de *1341 fendant’s wife’s failure to testify, which effectively destroyed the spousal privilege). 8 This reasoning applies equally to the situati…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. MacKey
See, e. g., Courtney v. United States, 390 F.2d 521, 527 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 857 , 89 S.Ct. 98 , 21 L.Ed. 2d 126 , rehearing denied, 393 U.S. 992 , 89 S.Ct. 440 , 21 L.Ed.2d 457 (1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
John M. Cleary v. O. Roy Chalk
See also Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power Dist. v. FPC, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 117 , 121, 391 F.2d 470 , 474, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 857 , 89 S.Ct. 104 , 21 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gooding
Compare Jones v United States, 392 US 299 , 20 L Ed 2d 1104 , 88 S Ct 2050 (1968), with Mittelman v United States, 392 US 917 , 20 L Ed 2d 1379 , 88 S Ct 2050 (1968); see also Courtney v United States, 390 F2d 521 (CA9th Cir) (1968), certiorari denied, 393 US 857 , 21 L Ed 2d 126 , 89 S Ct 98 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thoresen
v.
Goodwin, U. S. District Judge
v.
Goodwin, U. S. District Judge
No. 349.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1968.
393 U.S. 857
John P. Frank, John J. Flynn, and Peyton Ford for petitioner., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Mervyn Hamburg for respondent.
Douglas, Granted, Should.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.