green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Nopporn Sriyuth, A/K/A Thi Nopporn Sriyuth
See Holden v. United States, 388 F.2d 240, 242 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 864 , 89 S.Ct. 146 , 21 L.Ed.2d 132 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sriyuth
See Holden v. United States, 388 F.2d 240, 242 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 864 (1968). . . .
discussed
Cited "see"
Clemente v. Carnicon Management
See Saville, 400 F.2d at 400 (explaining that ___ _______ "`the burden is on the [adversely affected party] to take his objection at the earliest possible opportunity when, by so doing, he can enable the trial judge to take the most efficacious action'") (quoting Holden v. United States, 388 F.2d 240 , 242-43 ______ ______________ (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 864 (1968)). _____ ______ Although appellant waived any objection to the implementation of the jury view, we note that, in all events, the alleged errors seem benign.
discussed
Cited "see"
Clemente v. Carnicon-Puerto Rico Management Associates
See Saville, 400 F.2d at 400 (explaining that “‘the burden is on the [adversely affected party] to take his objection at the earliest possible opportunity when, by so doing, he can enable the trial judge to take the most efficacious action’ ”) (quoting Holden v. United States, 388 F.2d 240, 242-43 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 864 , 89 S.Ct. 146 , 21 L.Ed.2d 132 (1968)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Benitez, Appeal of Alfredo Peralta-Matos
See United States v. Briggs, 457 F.2d 908, 911 (2d Cir.) (“the general rule is that ‘the burden is on the defendant to take his objection at the earliest possible opportunity when, by so doing he can enable the trial judge to take the most efficacious action’ ”) (quoting Holden v. United States, 388 F.2d 240, 242-43 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 864 , 89 S.Ct. 146 , 21 L.Ed.2d 132 (1968)), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 337 , 34 L.Ed.2d 251 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David Leon Bradshaw
See Holden v. United States, 388 F.2d 240, 242 (1st Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 864 , 89 S.Ct. 146 , 21 L.Ed.2d 132 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald G. Lyman
See Holden v. United States, 388 F.2d 240 , 242—43 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 864 , 89 S.Ct. 146 , 21 L.Ed.2d 132 (1968); Birnbaum v. United States, 356 F.2d 856, 866 (8th Cir. 1966); Isaacs v. United States, 301 F.2d 706, 736 (8th Cir. 1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Williams
(Cf. People v. Graham, 71 Cal.2d 303, 318-320 [ 78 Cal.Rptr. 217 , 455 P.2d 153 ]; see also People v. Ruiz, 11 Cal.App.3d 852, 865 [ 90 Cal.Rptr. 110 ] and People v. Ray, 252 Cal.App.2d 932, 963 [ 61 Cal.Rptr. 1 ] [cert. den. 393 U.S. 864 ( 21 L.Ed.2d 132 , 89 S.Ct. 145 )].) Defense counsel was of little assistance in the area of instructions on the defense of unawareness of act and incapacity for intent due to epileptic unconsciousness.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ricardo Perez Goitia v. United States
Compare Holden v. United States, 388 F.2d 240 (1st Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 864 , 89 S.Ct. 146 , 21 L.Ed.2d 132 , with Desmond v. United States, 345 F.2d 225 (1st Cir. 1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Russel
v.
Craven, Warden
v.
Craven, Warden
No. 40.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1968.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Gerald H. Genard, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.