Atlas Engine Works, Inc. v. NLRB, 395 U.S. 828 (1969). · Go Syfert
Search
Atlas Engine Works, Inc. v. NLRB, 395 U.S. 828 (1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: L. M. Berry and Company v. National Labor Relations Board (ca6, 1982-01-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" L. M. Berry and Company v. National Labor Relations Board
6th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See, NLRB v. Lou De Young’s Market Basket, Inc., 406 F.2d 17, 24 (6th Cir. 1969), remanded on other grounds, 395 U.S. 828 , 89 S.Ct. 2125 , 23 L.Ed.2d 737 ; NLRB v. Continental Corp. of Michigan, 612 F.2d 257, 258-59 (6th Cir. 1979).
cited Cited "see" Thrift Drug Company of Pennsylvania v. National Labor Relations Board
6th Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Atlas Engine Works Inc. v. NLRB, 395 U.S. 828 , 89 S.Ct. 2125 , 23 L.Ed.2d 737 (1969).
cited Cited "see" National Labor Relations Board v. Patent Trader, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See 395 U.S. 828 (1969). 42 It is important to emphasize what this case is not.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." National Labor Relations Board v. Staub Cleaners, Inc., and Ben Barnet Cleaners, Inc. (2×)
2d Cir. · 1969 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also our decision in NLRB v. Pembeck Oil Corp., 404 F.2d 105 (2 Cir. 1968) vacated, 395 U.S. 828 , 89 S.Ct. 2125 , 23 L.Ed.2d 737 (1969), on the authority of Gissel.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ATLAS ENGINE WORKS, INC.
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.
598.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 23, 1969.
395 U.S. 828
Per Curiam.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.

Robert B. Gosline for petitioner in No. 598. Robert Lewis for petitioner in No. 906. Laurent K. Varnum for petitioner in No. 1213. Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for petitioner in No. 1273.

Solicitor General Griswold and Messrs. Ordman, Manoli, and Come for respondent in Nos. 598 and 906. Solicitor General Griswold and Mr. Ordman for respondent in No. 1213. William J. Larkin 2d for respondent in No. 1273.

PER CURIAM.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded to the respective United States Courts of Appeals with instructions to remand the cases to the National Labor Relations Board for further consideration in light of NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., ante, p. 575.

[*] Together with No. 906, Thrift Drug Co. of Pennsylvania v. National Labor Relations Board, and No. 1213, Lou De Young's Market Basket, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, also on petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit; and No. 1273, National Labor Relations Board v. Pembek Oil Corp., on petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.