green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
8.9 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case ·
“‘[T]he traditional rule’ is that ‘a plaintiff class should be certified despite conflicts over damages issues between early and late sellers of the stock’”
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Enron Corp. Securities
he traditional rule' is that 'a plaintiff class should be certified despite conflicts over damages issues between early and late sellers of the stock
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
South Carolina National Bank v. Stone
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
we see no reason why the trial court, if it determines individual reliance is an essential element to proof, cannot order separate trials on that particular issue, as on the question of damages, if necessary.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sims v. Wyrick
statements made by a party on the witness stand, if adverse to his interest, are considered to be admissions, and as such, they are admissible evidence against the maker in a subsequent criminal prosecution against him;
cited
Cited "see"
Medicare Beneficiaries' Defense Fund Ex Rel. Klass v. Shield
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 301 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Arenson v. Whitehall Convalescent & Nursing Home, Inc.
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 301 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re ML-Lee Acquisition Fund II, L.P. & ML-Lee Acquisition Fund (Retirement Accounts) II, L.P. Securities Litigation
Accord Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 299 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969) (an investor who purchased securities pursuant to a third prospectus was an adequate representative of a class which included investors who purchased securities pursuant to an earlier prospectus because the same misstatements were present in both).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Grand Jury Subpoena
Accord Heligman v. United States, 407 F.2d 448, 451-52 (8th Cir.) (the purpose of tax laws is to raise public funds, not to punish crimes) cert, denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2129 , 23 L.Ed.2d 765 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stoner v. LTV Corp. (In Re Chateaugay Corp.)
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 301 (2d Cir.1968) (“The effective administration of Rule 23[] will often require the use of the ‘sensible device’ of split trials.”), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mathis v. Bess
(2×)
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291 , 298 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackie Wayne Blankenship
See Gurleski v. United States, 405 F.2d 253, 267 (5th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 981, 89 S.Ct. 2127 , 2140, 23 L.Ed.2d 765 , 769 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Bexar County Health Facility Development Corp. Securities Litigation
See Green v. Wolf Corp. 406 F.2d 291 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969); In re Texas International Securities Litigation, 114 F.R.D. 33 (W.D.Okl.1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Randle v. Spectran
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 299 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Boardwalk Marketplace Securities Litigation
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 300 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Herbert W. Neal
See Hale v. United States, 406 F.2d 476, 479 (10 Cir.1969), cert. den. 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2129 , 23 L.Ed.2d 765 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Papadakis v. Warden of the Metropolitan Correctional Center
See Zaffarano v. Fitzpatrick, 404 F.2d 474, 478 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2130 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Papadakis v. Warden of Metropolitan Correctional Center
See Zaffarano v. Fitzpatrick, 404 F.2d 474, 478 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2130 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Linton v. Shearson Lehman/American Express, Inc.
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 300 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed. 2d 766 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Klein v. A.G. Becker Paribas Inc.
Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. Roper, 445 U.S. 326, 399 , 100 S.Ct. 1166, 1174 , 63 L.Ed.2d 427 (1980); see Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 301 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph v. General Motors Corp.
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 301 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969); Korn, 456 F.2d 1206 , 1212; Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Nisley, 300 F.2d 561, 589 (10th Cir.1961), cert. dismissed, 371 U.S. 801 , 83 S.Ct. 13 , 9 L.Ed.2d 46 (1962). 6.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gibb v. Delta Drilling Co.
See Green v. Wolf Corporation, 406 F.2d 291 , 300 (2d Cir.1968), ce rt. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969); Korn v. Franchard Corporation, 456 F.2d 1206 , 1210 (2d Cir.1972) (“This precondition [Rule 23(a)(2)’s common questions of law or fact] is plainly satisfied since the alleged misrepresentations in the prospectus relate to all the investors, and the existence and materiality of such misrepresentations obviously present important common issues”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fisher v. Plessey Co.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Green v. Wolf Corporation, 406 F.2d 291, 301 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969) (Even if proof of individual reliance necessary, argument that individual questions therefore predominate “would negate any attempted class action under Rule 10b-5, since ... reliance is an issue lurking in every 10b-5 action.” No reason why trial court cannot order separate trials on reliance issue if necessary); see also Dura-Bilt, 89 F.R.D. at 98 (If reliance must be proven, court can order separate hearings).
discussed
Cited "see"
Friedlander v. Barnes
F.R.Civ.P. 23(a)(2); see Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 299-300 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969); Pellman v. Cinerama, Inc., 89 F.R.D. 386, 389 (S.D.N.Y.1981) (Sofaer, J.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,428
See Green v. Wolf Corporation, 406 F.2d 291 (2nd Cir.1968), cert. denied 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969). 12 Tallant and Womack also challenge the district court's finding that certification of the class was appropriate under Rule 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
cited
Cited "see"
Kennedy v. Tallant
See Green v. Wolf Corporation, 406 F.2d 291 (2nd Cir. 1968), cert, denied 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dura-Bilt Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Corp.
(2×)
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 299 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969); Sargent v. Genesco, Inc., 75 F.R.D. 79, 83 (M.D.Fla.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Crane Co. v. American Standard, Inc.
Castles, 3d, May 27, 1970, at 11; see Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 302-03 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Greene v. Emersons Ltd.
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969); Harris v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc., 329 F.2d 909 (9th Cir. 1964); Fischer v. Kletz, supra; Kronenberg v. Hotel Governor Clinton, Inc., 41 F.R.D. 42 (S.D.N.Y.1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Keasler v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hochschuler v. G. D. Searle & Co.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969); Lewis v. Capital Mortgage Investments, 78 F.R.D. 295 (D.Md.1977); Kaufman v. Lawrence, 76 F.R.D. 397 (S.D.N.Y.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Herm v. Stafford
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 298 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969); Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Harris v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, 329 F.2d 909 (9th Cir. 1964).
cited
Cited "see"
Jennings Oil Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 301 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bryan v. Amrep Corp.
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 301 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969); Partain v. First National Bank of Montgomery, 59 F.R.D. 56, 59 (M.D.Ala.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rolf v. Blyth Eastman Dillon & Co., Inc.
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969); Myzel v. Fields, 386 F.2d 718 (8th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 951 , 88 S.Ct. 1043 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1143 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Billet v. Storage Technology Corp.
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 299 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed. 766 (1969); Elkind v. Liggett & Myers, Inc., 66 F.R.D. 36, 42 (S.D.N.Y. 1975); In re Caesars Palace Securities Litigation, 360 F.Supp. 366, 395 (S.D.N.Y. 1973); Dolgrow v. Anderson, 43 F.R.D. 472, 488 (E.D.N.Y.1968). .
cited
Cited "see"
Scherl v. United States
See Zaffarano v. Fitzpatrick, 404 F.2d 474, 478 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2130 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969). .
cited
Cited "see"
Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 296-97 (C.A. 2, 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Mills v. Roanoke Industrial Loan & Thrift
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291 (2nd Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Societe Generale De Banque v. Touche Ross & Co.
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robertson v. National Basketball Association
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 299 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U. S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969); Price v. Skolnick, supra; Feder v. Harrington, 52 F.R.D. 178, 182 (S.D.N.Y.1970); Jacobi v. Bache & Co., Inc., supra, 16 F.R.Serv.2d at 74; cf. Leisner v. New York Telephone Co., 358 F.Supp. 359, 372 (S.D.N.Y.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Aboudi v. Daroff
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969); Harris v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc., 329 F.2d 909 (9th Cir. 1964); Fischer v. Kletz, supra; Kronenberg v. Hotel Governor Clinton, Inc., 41 F.R.D. 42 (S.D.N.Y.1966).
cited
Cited "see"
National Auto Brokers Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 301 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Burkhart v. Allson Realty Trust
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
National Auto Brokers Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 301 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. den., 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 .
cited
Cited "see"
Kristiansen v. John Mullins & Sons, Inc.
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 298 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S. Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roy D. Garner v. United States
See Heligman v. United States, 407 F.2d 448 , 450-451 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2129 , 23 L.Ed.2d 765 (1969) ; Grimes v. United States, 379 F.2d 791 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 846 , 88 S.Ct. 104 , 19 L.Ed.2d 113 (1967) ; Stillman v. United States, 177 F.2d 607, 618 (9th Cir. 1949) (which the majority overrules) ; Shushan v. United States, 117 F.2d 110 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 313 U.S. 574 , 61 S.Ct. 1085 , 85 L.Ed. 1531 (1941). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Dolgow v. Anderson
See Green v. Wolf Corporation, 406 F.2d 291, 298 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969); Dolgow v. Anderson, 43 F.R.D. 472, 489-490, 501-502 (E.D.N.Y.1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vernon J. Rockler & Co. v. Graphic Enterprises, Inc.
See Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 298 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969); Mersay v. First Republic Corp. of America, supra, 43 F.R.D. at 470-471; Dolgow v. Anderson, supra, 43 F.R.D. at 495-496.
cited
Cited "see"
Ernst & Ernst v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
See Green v. Wolf Corporation, 406 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, Troster, Singer & Co., 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ernst & Ernst v. United States District Court For The Southern District Of Texas
See Green v. Wolf Corporation, 406 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, Troster, Singer & Co., 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969). 5 The Trustee makes no claim that his status as a Trustee in a Chapter X reorganization independently confers federal jurisdiction 6 The opinion refers to treating the Rule 12 motions as motions for summary judgment under Rule 56.
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank Smith v. United States
Notes: * Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir., 1970, 409 F.2d 431 , Part I 1 Smith v. United States, 5 Cir. 1969, 405 F.2d 253 , cert. denied 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2127 , 23 L.Ed.2d 765 2 The sole vitality still inhering in the instant appeals is the possibility of certiorari being granted by the Supreme Court in No. 28,438
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 1163.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 23, 1969.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Roger A. Pauley for the United States.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.