green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
See also Public Utility District No. 1 v. City of Seattle, 9 Cir. 1967, 382 F.2d 666, 675 (Byrne, J., dissenting), 1969, cert. dismissed, 396 U.S. 803 , 90 S.Ct. 22 , 24 L.Ed.2d 59 . 32 In summary, we find no reason to ignore the general rule of following federal law to set compensation in a federal condemnation because the United States is not taking the land directly. 33 Second, the appellants have argued that the federal interest in the value of property taken in a Section 21 proceeding is so small that the analysis established by Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 1943, 318 U.S. 363 , …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Georgia Power Co. v. 54.20 Acres of Land
See also Public Utility District No. 1 v. City of Seattle, 9 Cir. 1967, 382 F.2d 666, 675 (Byrne, J., dissenting), 1969, cert. dismissed, 396 U.S. 803 , 90 S.Ct. 22 , 24 L.Ed.2d 59 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Public Utility Dist. No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, Washington
v.
City of Seattle
v.
City of Seattle
Published
PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. NO. 1 OF PEND OREILLE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
v.
CITY OF SEATTLE.
No. 2.
CITY OF SEATTLE
1
v.
PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. NO. 1 OF PEND OREILLE
2
COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
3
No. 3.
Supreme Court of the United States
4
October Term, 1969.
5
October Term, 1969.
October 13, 1969
6
Clarence C. Dill, William G. Ennis, and Bennett Boskey, for Public Utility Dist. No. 1 of Pend Oreille County.
7
A. L. Newbould and Richard S. White, for City of Seattle.
8
Solicitor General Griswold, for the United States, amicus curiae.
9
The petitions for writs of certiorari dismissed under Rule 60.