green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
2.5 score
“general conclusionary allegations unsupported by facts insufficient to constitute cause of action”
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Carter v. Union Security Life Insurance
general conclusionary allegations unsupported by facts insufficient to constitute cause of action
discussed
Cited "see"
Doe v. Cloverleaf Mall
See Jewell v. City of Covington, 425 F.2d 459, 460 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 929 , 91 S.Ct. 195 , 27 L.Ed.2d 189 (1970) (general conclusionary allegations unsupported by facts insufficient to constitute cause of action); see also Pierre v. American-International Travel, Inc., 717 F.Supp. 435, 437 (M.D.La.1989) (finding nondiverse defendant fraudulently joined where petition alleged no facts to establish legal duty on part of resident defendant to plaintiff); D'Addio v. L.F.
cited
Cited "see"
Advance Labor Service, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
See Jewell v. City of Covington, 425 F.2d 459 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. den. 400 U.S. 929 , 91 S.Ct. 195 , 27 L.Ed.2d 189 (1970); Hoffman v. Halden, 268 F.2d 280 (9th Cir. 1959).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dopp v. Fairfax Consultants, Ltd.
See, e.g., Jewell v. City of Covington, 425 F.2d 459 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 929 , 91 S.Ct. 195 , 27 L.Ed.2d 189 (1970); Harper v. United States, 423 F.Supp. 192, 196 (D.S.C.1976) (court will not speculate as to plaintiff’s actions or injuries); Bergman v. Stein, 404 F.Supp. 287, 292-293 (S.D.N.Y.1975) (claims “fall within the realm of speculative injury which the court may not consider”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael G. Holdiness v. A.M. Stroud, Jr.
See, e.g., Jewell v. City of Covington, 425 F.2d 459 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 929 , 91 S.Ct. 195 , 27 L.Ed.2d 189 (1970); Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1, 30 (D.C.Cir.1984); Ostrer v. Avonwald, 567 F.2d 551 , 553 (2d Cir.1977); Hoffman v. Halden, 268 F.2d 280, 295-96 (9th Cir.1959). 35 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Grindstaff
The grant of a severance on this ground is not favored, and a defendant seeking the same is required “ * * * to make an adequate showing of prejudice to justify disregarding the general rule favoring a joint trial for persons jointly indicted. * * * ” United States v. Vaughn, C.A. 6th (1970), 422 F.2d 812, 814 [3]. “ * * * [The] [m]ovant must establish to the satisfaction of the trial judge that the testimony in question is exculpatory in effect and that the designated codefendant will in fact testify at a separate trial. * * * ” United States v. Morrow, C.A. 5th (1976), 537 F.2d 120, …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Turner
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 5728.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 23, 1970.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. Mississippi (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.