Morton v. Quaker Action Grp., 402 U.S. 926 (1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Morton v. Quaker Action Grp., 402 U.S. 926 (1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Watt (cadc, 1983-03-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Watt
D.C. Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Quaker Action Group v. Morton, 402 U.S. 926 , 91 S.Ct. 1398 , 28 L.Ed.2d 665 (1971); VVAW, 506 F.2d 53 (D.C.Cir.1974). 31 If, on the other hand, the government anticipates an increase in applications for symbolic campsites, with requests for permission to sleep during all night demonstrations, it may not deny all such requests merely because it expects a large number of people to apply.
discussed Cited "see" The Community for Creative Non-Violence v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Interior the Community for Creative Non-Violence v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Interior
D.C. Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Quaker Action Group v. Morton, 402 U.S. 926 , 91 S.Ct. 1398 , 28 L.Ed.2d 665 (1971); VVAW, 506 F.2d 53 (D.C.Cir.1974). 31 If, on the other hand, the government anticipates an increase in applications for symbolic campsites, with requests for permission to sleep during all night demonstrations, it may not deny all such requests merely because it expects a large number of people to apply. 40 Our holding does not mean, however, that the Park Service must grant every request, at any time, for any number of temporary structures or sleepers.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.
W.D. Mo. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, e.g., Mississippi v. Arkansas, 402 U.S. 926 , 91 S.Ct. 1521 , 28 L.Ed.2d 861 (1971) (appointing master in boundary dispute); 411 U.S. 913 , 93 S.Ct. 1539 , 36 L.Ed.2d 305 (1973) (accepting master’s report); 415 U.S. 289 , 94 S.Ct. 1046 , 39 L.Ed.2d 333 (1974) (decision).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hart v. Community Sch. Bd. of Brooklyn, NY Sch. D. 21
E.D.N.Y · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, e. g., Mississippi v. Arkansas, 402 U.S. 926 , 91 S.Ct. 1521 , 28 L.Ed.2d 861 (1971) (appointing master in boundary dispute); 411 U.S. 913 , 93 S.Ct. 1539 , 36 L.Ed.2d 305 (1973) (accepting master’s report); 415 U.S. 289 , 94 S.Ct. 1046 , 39 L.Ed.2d 333 (1974) (decision).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morton, Secretary of the Interior
v.
Quaker Action Group
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 1971.
402 U.S. 926
Consideration, Matter, Took.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

Upon consideration of the application of the Solicitor General of the United States for a stay herein and the opposition to such stay on behalf of the respondents presented to The Chief Justice as Circuit Justice for the District of Columbia Circuit at 6 p. m. on April 20, 1971, The Chief Justice entered an order, dated April 20, 1971, vacating the order of the United States Court of Appeals, dated April 19, 1971, which modified the preliminary injunction issued on April 16, 1971, by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and reinstated the said order of the District Court, dated April 16, 1971, pending further order of the Court; and said matter being referred by The Chief Justice to the Court and the Court having considered the matter,

It is ordered

(1) that the Order of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, dated April 19, 1971, modifying the preliminary injunction issued by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on April 16, 1971, is vacated;

(2) that the preliminary injunction issued by the United States District Court herein on April 16, 1971, is reinstated with full force and effect.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration of this matter.