green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.8 score
“because the officer was authorized to arrest ... there is no need to analyze whether ... a reasonable officer would have stopped solely for this violation.”
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Orozco
because the officer was authorized to arrest ... there is no need to analyze whether ... a reasonable officer would have stopped solely for this violation.
cited
Cited "see"
Php Healthcare Corporation v. Emsa Limited Partnership
See Rachal v. Hill, 435 F.2d 59, 65 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2203 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
DuVoisin v. Coker (In re Southern Industrial Banking Corp.)
See Ransom v. Brennan, 437 F.2d 513 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971); Downie v. Pritchard, 309 F.2d 634 (8th Cir.1962); Continental Assurance Co. v. American Bankshares Corp., 483 F.Supp. 175 (E.D.Wis.1980).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena. (Four Cases) United States of America v. Under Seal, (Four Cases)
See United States v. Gurule, 437 F.2d 239, 241 (10th Cir.1970), ce rt. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 679 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Wagner v. Lehman Bros. Kuhn Loeb Inc.
See Ransom v. Brennan, 437 F.2d 513, 516 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alberti v. Klevenhagen
Newman v. Graddick, 740 F.2d at 1517, 1518 (11th Cir.1984); See Ranson v. Brennan, 437 F.2d 513, 516 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971); FED.R.CIV.P. 25(d)(1).
discussed
Cited "see"
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, a Corporation of Delaware v. Eco Chem, Inc., a Corporation of Minnesota, George G. Rynne, an Individual
(2×)
The courts that have considered this problem have uniformly held “that if in personam jurisdiction has been previously acquired of the original party, then the in personam jurisdic tion continues over the substituted party.” Bertsch v. Canterbury, 18 F.R.D. 23, 27 (S.D.Cal.1955) (dictum); accord, Ransom v. Brennan, 46 F.R.D. 16 (S.D.Tex.1969), rev’d on other grounds, 437 F.2d 513 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Lummis v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada
See Ransom v. Brennan, 437 F.2d 513 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied 403 U.S. 904 (1971); Bertsch v. Canterbury, 18 F.R.D. 23 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bosurgi
See Ransom v. Brennan, 437 F.2d 513, 518 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971) ; United States v. Marple Community Record, Inc., 335 F.Supp. 95, 101 (E.D.Pa.1971) ; cf. Stone v. Bank of Commerce, 174 U.S. 412, 421 , 19 S.Ct. 747 , 43 L.Ed. 1028 (1899). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Pochiro and Karen Pochiro, Husband and Wife v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Corp., 22 Ariz.App. 572 , 529 P.2d 726, 729 (1974) (same); see also Ransom v. Brennan, 437 F.2d 513, 516-19 (5th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S. Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971); Schultz v. Schultz, 436 F.2d 635, 639-40 (7th Cir. 1971) (same). 5 Moreover, the Pochiros do not claim that Prudential otherwise received a copy of their complaint before December 2, 1984, which was the thirtieth day prior to the filing of the petition for removal.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pignatiello v. District Court in and for the Second Judicial District
United States v. Reno, 522 F.2d 572 (10th Cir.1975); see also United States v. Gurule, 437 F.2d 239 (10th Cir.1970), ce rt. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 679 (1971); In re Grand Jury Investigation, 459 F.Supp. 1335 (E.D.Pa.1978); People ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pignatiello v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR SEC. JUD.
United States v. Reno, 522 F.2d 572 (10th Cir.1975); see also United States v. Gurule, 437 F.2d 239 (10th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 679 (1971); In re Grand Jury Investigation, 459 F.Supp. 1335 (E.D.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Miller Brothers Construction Company, Rapidways, Inc.
See, e. g., Ransom v. Brennan, 437 F.2d 513 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. den’d, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 ; 3B Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 25.05 (2nd ed. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.
See also Rachal v. Hill, 435 F.2d 59 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2203 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 ; Bruszewski v. United States, 181 F.2d 419 (3d Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 865 , 71 S.Ct. 87 , 95 L.Ed. 632 ; Zdanok v. Glidden Co., 327 F.2d 944 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 934 , 84 S.Ct. 1338 , 12 L.Ed.2d 298 ; Bernhard v. Bank of America, 19 Cal.2d 807 , 122 P.2d 892 (1942) ; Israel v. Wood Dolson Co., 1 N.Y.2d 116 , 151 N.Y.S.2d 1 , 134 N.E.2d 97 (1956) ; Semmel, Collateral Estoppel, Mutuality and Joinder of Parties, 68 Colum.L.Rev. 1457 (1968) ; Note, Collat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph M. Joyner
See, e. g., Chaney v. State, 237 So.2d 281, 283 (Fla.App.1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971) and Chippas v. State, 180 So.2d 355, 358 (Fla.App.1965), both citing Bell v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 254 F.2d 82 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 885 , 79 S.Ct. 126 , 3 L.Ed.2d 113 (1958).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dies
v.
Carter
v.
Carter
No. 1606.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 7, 1971.
Published
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)
Appeal from D. C. N. D. Tex. Probable jurisdiction noted.