green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter Angelilli, William Butler, Donald Irish, and Donald Ribotsky
(2×)
See United States v. Augello, 451 F.2d 1167, 1170 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1070 , 92 S.Ct. 1518 , 31 L.Ed.2d 802 (1972); United States v. Calder, 641 F.2d 76, 78 (2d Cir. 1981); United States v. Tropiano, 418 F.2d 1069, 1076-77 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1021 , 90 S.Ct. 1258 , 25 L.Ed.2d 530 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Digregorio, Hermis Yanis, Jr., Ruben Badillo, John Delvecchio
See United States v. Augello, 451 F.2d 1167 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1070 , 92 S.Ct. 1518 , 31 L.Ed.2d 802 (1972) (threats to the person of owner-operator of small corporate business while demanding “protection” money relating to operation of business affect the corporation).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Cotroni and Frank Dasti
See United States v. Augello, 451 F.2d 1167, 1170 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1070 , 92 S.Ct. 1518 , 31 L.Ed.2d 802 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Colin F. MacCollom v. United States
(2×)
See MaGee v. Nelson, 455 F.2d 275, 276 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1070 , 92 S.Ct. 1517 , 31 L.Ed.2d 802 (1972). 53 In Taylor v. United States, 238 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 938 , 77 S.Ct. 817 , 1 L.Ed.2d 761 (1957), we denied a trial transcript in a section 2255 case.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dominic Biondo and Willie Francisco Orlando
See United States v. Augello, 451 F.2d 1167 (2nd Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1070 , 92 S.Ct. 1518 , 31 L.Ed.2d 802 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Chester Vernon Zeigler, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Augello, 451 F.2d 1167, 1170 (2d Cir.1971) ($100 taken directly from restaurant’s cash register to pay extortionist showed depletion of assets, “which by itself may impair the efficient conduct of [restaurant’s] business sufficiently to affect commerce”), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1070 , 92 S.Ct. 1518 , 31 L.Ed.2d 802 (1972); United States v. Provenzano, 334 F.2d 678, 692 (3rd Cir.) (“The specific amount of such money obtained by extortion or the precise manner or degree to which it had an effect on the business is of no consequence.”), cert. denied, 379 U.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Aviles
The general rule in the Federal courts is that sanctions will not be imposed "where the loss was inadvertent and not deliberate or in bad faith, and there was not such prejudice to the defendant as to deny him a fair trial.” (United States v Miranda, 526 F2d 1319, 1327, and cases from other circuits cited therein; see, also, United States v Augello, 451 F2d 1167, cert den 405 US 1070 .) None of the Federal cases cited by the court in Lunney permitted suppression under the Jencks Act.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Beto
See, e. g., Watt v. Page, 452 F.2d 1174 (10th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1070 , 92 S.Ct. 1520 , 31 L.Ed.2d 803 ; Moye v. State of Georgia, 330 F.Supp. 290 (N.D.Ga.1971); Hall v. Cox, 324 F.Supp. 786 (W.D.Va.1971); McFalls v. Peyton, 270 F.Supp. 577 (W.D.Va.1967), aff’d, 401 F.2d 890 (4th Cir.); United States v. Social Service Dept., 263 F.Supp. 971 (E.D.Pa.1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mattison
v.
California
v.
California
No. 71-6049.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 17, 1972.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.