Ingram v. Haskins, 406 U.S. 932 (1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Ingram v. Haskins, 406 U.S. 932 (1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
94 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 25 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Apex Oil Co. v. DiMauro (nysd, 1989-04-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Apex Oil Co. v. DiMauro
S.D.N.Y. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cargill, Inc. v. Hardin, 452 F.2d 1154 , 1162 & 1164 (8th Cir.1971), cert. denied 406 U.S. 932 , 92 S.Ct. 1770 , 32 L.Ed.2d 135 (1972); Volkart Bros. v. Freeman, 311 F.2d 52, 59 (5th Cir.1962); G.H.
discussed Cited "see" Minpeco, S.A. v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cargill, Inc. v. Hardin, 452 F.2d 1154, 1164 (8th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 932 , 92 S.Ct. 1770 , 32 L.Ed.2d 137 (1972). 9 Evidence of Bache’s knowledge of this trading behavior, coupled with evidence of other indicia of manipulative trading at Bache, and with Bache’s knowledge of Bunker and Herbert Hunt’s prior unusual, if not suspicious, silver trading behavior while at Bache, permits a reasonable inference that Bache knew of the Hunts’ manipulation.
cited Cited "see" Marchese v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.
C.D. Cal. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cargill, Inc. v. Hardin, 452 F.2d 1154 (8th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 932 , 92 S.Ct. 1770 , 32 L.Ed.2d 135 (1972).
discussed Cited "see" Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Co Petro Marketing Group, Inc., a California Corporation Harold D. Goldstein and Michael Bradley Krivacek (2×)
9th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cargill, Inc. v. Hardin, 452 F.2d 1154, 1157 (8th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 932 , 92 S.Ct. 1770 , 32 L.Ed.2d 135 (1972); H.R.Rep.No.93-975, supra, at 130. 12 While contracts pursuant to Co Petro's Agency Agreements were not as rigidly standardized as futures contracts traded on licensed contract markets, neither were they individualized.
discussed Cited "see" Neil Leist, Philip Smith and Incomco v. John Richard Simplot, J. R. Simplot & Co., Simplot Products Co., Inc., Simplot Industries, Inc., Simtag Farms, Inc., Peter J. Taggares, P. J. Taggares & Co., Henry A. Pollack, Harvey B. Pollack, Harvey B. Pollack Company, Gerald Rafferty, Pressner Trading Corp., Benjamin Pressner, Stephen Sundheimer, Jules Nordlight, Edelstein & Co., Inc., Charles Edelstein, Robert Edelstein, Murial Edelstein, Meierfeld & Company, Inc., Gilbert Meierfeld, David Meierfeld, Robert Reardon, F. J. Reardon, Inc., Harold Collins, Caspar Mayerson, Lynnewood Exporting Company, Alex Sinclair, Manning Stoller, Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill, Noyes Inc., Mfx Commodities, Inc., Donald Silver, Duane South, Kenneth Ramm, a & B Farming Inc., Hugh Glenn, Gearheart Farming, Inc., Edward McKay \John\" Humphreys (2×)
unknown court · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cargill, Inc. v. Hardin, 452 F.2d 1154, 1157 (8 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 932 , 92 S.Ct. 1770 , 32 L.Ed.2d 135 (1972).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Edward F. Ross
9th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. DeLaughter, 453 F.2d 908, 910 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 932 , 92 S.Ct. 1769 , 32 L.Ed.2d 135 (1972) (trial court returned the jury to jury room to write out a verdict on one count of the indictment to which they had agreed); United States v. Barash, 412 F.2d 26, 32 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 832 , 90 S.Ct. 86 , 24 L.Ed.2d 82 (1969) (trial court accepted a partial verdict and then returned the jury for further deliberations).
discussed Cited "see" Leist v. Simplot (2×)
unknown court · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cargill, Inc. v. Hardin, 452 F.2d 1154, 1157 (8 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 932 , 92 S.Ct. 1770 , 32 L.Ed.2d 135 (1972).
cited Cited "see" United States v. William Lorain Evans, III
5th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Delaughter, 5 Cir., 1972, 453 F.2d 908 , cert. denied, 406 U.S. 932 , 92 S.Ct. 1769 , 32 L.Ed.2d 135 (1972).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re Sumitomo Copper Litigation
S.D.N.Y. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Cargill, Inc. v. Hardin, 452 F.2d 1154, 1163 (8th Cir.1971), cert. denied sub nom., Cargill, Inc. v. Butz, 406 U.S. 932 , 92 S.Ct. 1770 , 32 L.Ed.2d 135 (1972) (manipulation is “the creation of an artificial price by planned action, whether by one man or a group of men”). 4 The methods of “manipulation are limited only by the ingenuity of man.” Id.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ingram
v.
Haskins, Correctional Superintendent
No. 71-6288.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 15, 1972.
406 U.S. 932
Douglas, Granted, Should.
Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.