green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases ·
…the reference to a retrial if the jury did not reach a verdict was improper . also improper was the statement that 'it is incumbent upon you to reach a ver- dict' .
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Sell
the reference to a retrial if the jury did not reach a verdict was improper . also improper was the statement that 'it is incumbent upon you to reach a ver- dict' .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Sell
the reference to a retrial if the jury did not reach a verdict was improper . also improper was the statement that 'it is incumbent upon you to reach a ver- dict' .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lewis
See State v. Marsh, 260 Or 416, 423 , 490 P2d 491 (1971), cert den, 406 US 974 (1972) (defining a deadlocked jury instruction as “a supplemental instruction given to encourage deadlocked juries to reach agreement”).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lewis
See State v. Marsh, 260 Or 416, 423 , 490 P2d 491 (1971), cert den, 406 US 974 (1972) (defining a deadlocked jury instruction as “a supplemental instruction given to encourage deadlocked juries to reach agreement”).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bowen
See State v. Douglas, 260 Or 60, 81 , 488 P2d 1366 , cert den 406 US 974 (1971) (O’Connell, C.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hardy
See State v. Muse, 280 N.C. 31 , 185 S.E. 2d 214 (1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 974 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Howard Eric Genser
(2×)
See Bell v. Kansas, 452 F.2d 783 (10th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 974 , 92 S.Ct. 2421 , 32 L.Ed.2d 674 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Branch
App. 689 , 236 S.E. 2d 309 (1977); see State v. Muse, 280 N.C. 31 , 185 S.E. 2d 214 (1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 974 , 32 L.Ed. 2d 674 , 92 S.Ct. 2409 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. DeLong
See Harris v. United States, 390 US 234, 236 , 19 L Ed 2d 1067 , 88 S Ct 992 (1968) (per curiam.) * * 61 L Ed 2d at 245, n 13 . 5 We note that the instant case does not present the situation of State v. Douglas, 260 Or 60 , 488 P2d 1366 (1971), cert den, 406 US 974 (1972), /herein defendant consented to a search of his suitcase after he was iformed by the police that if he did not consent, they would apply for a earch warrant.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Roy
See Simmons v. United States, 390 US 377 , 88 S Ct 967 , 19 L Ed2d 1247 (1968). 3 Defendant argues that State v. Douglas, 260 Or 60 , 488 P2d 1366 , cert denied 406 US 974 (1971), is distinguishable in that there the police officers actually had probable cause to obtain a warrant whereas in this case there is no indication that the police officers had probable cause to search the knapsack.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William H. Addington
See Bell v. Kansas, 452 F.2d 783 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 974 , 92 S.Ct. 2421 , 32 L.Ed.2d 674 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hays v. DRIVER AND MOTOR VEHICLE SERVICES
See, e.g., State v. Douglas, 260 Or. 60, 81 , 488 P.2d 1366 (1971), cert. den., 406 U.S. 974 , 92 S.Ct. 2420 , 32 L.Ed.2d 674 (1972) (O'Connell, C.J., dissenting on other grounds) (threat to obtain warrant does not necessarily render subsequent consent coerced "[i]f the officers threaten only to do what the law permits them to do").
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hays v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services Division
See, e.g., State v. Douglas, 260 Or 60, 81 , 488 P2d 1366 (1971), cert den, 406 US 974 (1972) (O’Connell, C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Copening v. United States
Compare Patterson v. United States, D.C.App., 301 A.2d 67 (1973), with United States v. Wilder, supra. Cf. Bell v. Kansas, 452 F.2d 783, 793 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 974 , 92 S.Ct. 2421 , 32 L.Ed.2d 674 (1972); State v. Miller, 50 Or.App. 501 , 484 P.2d 1132 (Or.App.1971), cer t. denied, 405 U.S. 1047 , 92 S.Ct. 1321 , 31 L.Ed.2d 590 (1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Davis
v.
Oregon
v.
Oregon
No. 71-5407.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 7, 1972.
Sup. Ct. Ore. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.