green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.5 score
“he specific requirement of the statute ( 15 u.s.c. 1051 ) is not a disclosure of use, but a disclosure of use by those having 'the right to use' ....”
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
King-Size, Inc. v. Frank's King Size Clothes, Inc.
he specific requirement of the statute ( 15 u.s.c. 1051 ) is not a disclosure of use, but a disclosure of use by those having 'the right to use' ....
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Dattner Architects
See Chavez v. Freshpict Foods, Inc., 322 F.Supp. 146, 148 (D.Colo. 1971), aff'd, 456 F.2d 890 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 535 , 34 L.Ed.2d 492 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Strother S. Holder v. North Carolina Department of Corrections George Boone Frank Evans Tom Hoard Sgt. Moore John Williams
See Robinson v. McCorkle, 462 F.2d 111, 113 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Gerald W. Hughes v. Dale Foltz
See Lotz v. Koloski, 460 F.2d 1284 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 (1972); Luallen v. Neil, 453 F. 2d 428 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 857 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Bergman v. United States
See Robinson v. McCorkle, 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed.2d 492 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Stern v. New Haven Community Schools
See, Robinson v. McCorkle, 462 F.2d 111, 114 (CA 3, 1972), cert. denied 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed.2d 492 .
cited
Cited "see"
Peck v. United States
See Robinson v. McCorkle, 462 F.2d 111, 113 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed.2d 492 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Raitport v. Provident National Bank
See Robinson v. McCorkle, 462 F.2d 111, 113 (3d Cir.) (alternative holding), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed.2d 492 (1972); Smith v. Rosenbaum, 460 F.2d 1019, 1020 (3d Cir. 1972) (per curiam) (alternative holding); Marcedes v. Barrett, 453 F.2d 391, 392 (3d Cir. 1971) (per curiam) (alternative holding); Henig v. Odorioso, 385 F.2d 491, 494 (3d Cir. 1967).
examined
Cited "see"
East Hartford Education Association v. Board of Education of the Town of East Hartford
(4×)
See James v. Board of Education, 461 F.2d 566, 573 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed.2d 491 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Mitchell v. National Broadcasting Co.
See James v. Board of Education, 461 F.2d 566, 571 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed.2d 491 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
14 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1034, 13 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,616 Blanche Mitchell v. National Broadcasting Company and S. Theodore Nygreen, Manager of Information Services, National Broadcasting Company
See James v. Board of Education, 461 F.2d 566, 571 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed.2d 491 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sheets v. Stanley Community School District No. 2
See James v. Board of Education, 461 F.2d 566, 574 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed.2d 491 (1972), rehearing denied, 410 U.S. 947 , 93 S.Ct. 1355 , 35 L.Ed.2d 617 (1973), and Hostrop v. Board, 471 F.2d 488, 492 (7th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 967 , 93 S.Ct. 2150 , 36 L.Ed.2d 688 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Rappaport v. Little League Baseball, Inc.
See Robinson v. McCorkle, 462 F.2d 111, 113 (C.A.3, 1972) cert. den. 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed.2d 492 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Susan Rae BAKER, Appellant, v. STUART BROADCASTING COMPANY, a Corporation, Et Al., Appellees
Dombrowski v. Dowling, supra, 459 F.2d at 196 ; see Robinson v. McCorkle, 462 F.2d 111 , 113 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed.2d 492 (1972); Blackburn v. Fisk University, 443 F.2d 121, 124 (6th Cir. 1971); cf. Hill v. McClellan, 490 F.2d 859 (5th Cir. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lawton v. Medevac Mid-America, Inc.
See, e.g., Robinson v. McCorkle, 462 F.2d 111, 113 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed.2d 492 (1972) (pleading conspiracy under section 1985(3) requires at least minimum factual support of the existence of a conspiracy).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lewis v. Green
"With near unanimity, the courts have rejected complaints containing only conclusory allegations of conspiracy under these sections.” Snowden v. Hughes, 321 U.S. 1 , 64 S.Ct. 397 , 88 L.Ed. 497 (1944) (§ 1985(3)); See, e.g., Robinson v. McCorkle, 462 F.2d 111 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed.2d 492 (1972) (§ 1985(3)); De Wit v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, 570 F.Supp. 613 (S.D.N.Y.1983) (§ 1985(2)); Bodenmiller v. Stanchfield , 557 F.Supp. 857 (E.D.N.Y.1983) (§ 1985(2)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. United States
Compare Pushkin v. Regents of University of Colorado, 658 F.2d 1372 , 1380 (10th Cir.1981) (clear Congressional intent to create private right of action), with Chavez v. Freshpict Foods, Inc., 456 F.2d 890, 894 (10th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 535 , 34 L.Ed.2d 492 (absence of Congressional intent).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. United States
Compare Pushkin v. Regents of University of Colorado, 658 F.2d 1372 , 1380 (10th Cir.1981) (clear Congressional intent to create private right of action), with Chavez v. Freshpict Foods, Inc., 456 F.2d 890, 894 (10th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 535 , 34 L.Ed.2d 492 (absence of Congressional intent).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chocallo v. Bureau of Hearings and Appeals, SSA
Waits v. McGowan, 516 F.2d 203, 208-09 (3d Cir. 1975); See also Robinson v. McCorkle, 462 F.2d 111, 113 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed.2d 492 (1972); Local No. 1 (ACA) v. I.B.T., C, W. & H., 419 F.Supp. 263 , 275-77 (E.D.Pa.1976). “ ‘Section [1985(3) ] provides no substantive right itself; it merely provides a remedy for violation of rights it designates.’ ” Marino v. Bowers, 657 F.2d 1363, 1371 (3d Cir. 1981), (quoting Great American Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Novotny, 442 U.S. 366, 372 , 99 S.Ct. 2345, 2349 , 60 L.Ed.2d 957 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martinez v. Winner
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 463 F.Supp. 1220, 1231 (W.D.Pa.1979) (“a plaintiff in a civil rights case must plead highly specific facts in support of the allegations of the complaint, particularly where a conspiracy on the part of the defendants is claimed.”); see also Robinson v. McCorkle, 462 F.2d 111, 113 (3rd Cir. 1972), cert. denied 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed.2d 492 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Prochaska v. Fediaczko
See, e.g., Robinson v. McCorkle, 462 F.2d 111 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed.2d 492 (1972); Marcedes v. Barrett, 453 F.2d 391 (3d Cir. 1971); Fletcher v. Hook, 446 F.2d 14 (3d Cir. 1971).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Boles v. Fox
See also, Robinson v. McCorkle, 462 F.2d 111 (3d Cir.) cert. den. 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed. 2d 492 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schmidt v. Degen
See, e. g., Robinson v. McCorkle, 462 F.2d 111 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed.2d 492 (1972) ; Grove v. Rizzolo, 441 F.2d 1153 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 300 , 30 L.Ed.2d 261 (1971) ; Turack v. Guido, 464 F.2d 535 (3d Cir. 1972) ; United States ex rel.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Board of Education of Central District No. 1 of the Town of Addison
v.
James
v.
James
No. 72-564.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1972.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: S.D. Texas (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.