Monroe v. Cussen, 409 U.S. 846 (1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Monroe v. Cussen, 409 U.S. 846 (1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
117 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Eunice Rebecca Smith, A/K/A Becque Smith, Thomas Lee Rush (ca11, 1990-03-12) · Strongest negative: United States v. Donald James and David Anthony Butler, United States of America v. Henry Smith and Kenneth Wayne Whitmore (ca5, 1979-02-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Donald James and David Anthony Butler, United States of America v. Henry Smith and Kenneth Wayne Whitmore (2×) also: Cited "see"
5th Cir. · 1979 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Harrell, 436 F.2d 606, 616 (5th Cir. 1970), Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 49 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Eunice Rebecca Smith, A/K/A Becque Smith, Thomas Lee Rush
11th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Harrell, 436 F.2d 606 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 49 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972), and United States v. King, 505 F.2d 602 (5th Cir.1974).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Victor Posner
11th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Harrell, 436 F.2d 606, 613 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 49 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Albert W. Coachman. Appeal of Wendell Hill (Material Witness). United States of America v. Albert W. Coachman. Appeal of Gary Ballard (Material Witness)
D.C. Cir. · 1985 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Baker v. Eisenstadt, 456 F.2d 382, 390 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 87 (1972).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Coachman
D.C. Cir. · 1985 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Baker v. Eisenstadt, 456 F.2d 382, 390 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 87 (1972).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Billy G. Byers (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Handy, 454 F.2d 885, 889 (9th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 49 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972); United States v. Baird, 414 F.2d 700, 709 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1005 , 90 S.Ct. 559 , 24 L.Ed.2d 497 (1970). 49 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. DeLong (2×)
Me. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
Gendron v. Burnham, 146 Me. 387, 398 , 82 A.2d 773, 781 (1951); see Baker v. Eisenstadt, 456 F.2d 382, 388 (1st Cir.) (refusal to answer questions in "actual presence" of court is criminal contempt and may be punished summarily), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 87 (1972).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Michael Jeffrey Salomon
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
United States v. Eastwood, 489 F.2d 818, 822 (5th Cir. 1973); see United States v. Russo, 455 F.2d 1225, 1227 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 49 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972).
discussed Cited "see" Khaalis v. United States
D.C. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
Id.; accord, United States v. Allen, 588 F.2d 1100 , 1106-07 & n. 12 (5th Cir. 1979); see United States v. Handy, 454 F.2d 885, 890-92 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 49 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Pratt
Md. · 1979 · signal: accord · confidence high
E.g., State v. Evans, 278 Md. 197 , 209 n. 2, 362 A. 2d 629 , 636 n. 2 (1976); Bradford v. State, 234 Md. 505, 513 , 200 A. 2d 150, 155 (1964); accord, e.g., United States v. Handy, 454 F. 2d 885, 888 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 846 (1972).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Samuel S. Smith and Grover Lamar Lee, A/K/A Poss
5th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Harrell, 5 Cir., 1970, 436 F.2d 606, 612 (although reversal of the conviction was not based on appellant’s untimely challenge to the Court’s charge on entrapment, on remand trial court should follow Notaro standards in fashioning the instruction), cert. denied, 1972, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 49 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Arias-Diaz
5th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Harrell, 5 Cir. 1970, 436 F.2d 606, 613 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 49 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 . 17 Quinones was arrested in Leesburg on January 10, 1972.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Arias-Diaz
5th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Harrell, 5 Cir. 1970, 436 F.2d 606, 613 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 49 , 34 L.Ed. 2d 86 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Gerald F. Blanchard, United States of America v. Guthro & McCabe Tavern, Inc.
1st Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Wedgewood, 457 F.2d 648, 650-651 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 51 , 34 L.Ed.2d 87 (1972).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Duwayne McCurdy
9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
Co. v. United States, 371 U.S. 341, 362-63 (1963) (petitioners' objection that the clerk of the district court failed to employ a jury selection method designed to secure a cross-section of the population was lost under Rule 12(b)(2) because petitioners failed to object prior to trial); Paige v. United States, 493 F.2d 22, 23 (9th Cir.) (relying on Rule 12(b)(2) and declining to address merits of appellant's constitutional challenge to use of voter lists to select petit jury array where appellant failed to raise claim before trial), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 935 (1974); see also United States v. …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. John Stanley Campbell, United States of America v. Riley Ray Fultz (2×)
6th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Handy, 454 F.2d 885 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 49 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972) (exclusionary rule would apply to defendant’s refusal to submit to compulsory psychiatric examination pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4244 .) 2 Of course, the Rule’s sanction is permissive and need not be imposed.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Just (2×)
Conn. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
State v. Gargano, supra, 108 .” After we decided Pikul , we had occasion to point out that Pikul “stands for the principle that the guilty plea of one or more persons jointly charged with a crime cannot be admitted in the trial of another so charged ‘to establish that the crime was committed.’ . . . .” (Citations omitted.) State v. DellaCamera, 166 Conn. 557, 565 , 353 A.2d 750 (1974); see, e.g., United States v. Harrell, 436 F.2d 606, 614-16 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S. Ct. 49 , 34 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Barnwell & Hays, Inc. v. Glen T. Sloan
8th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Brown v. Scott, 326 F.Supp. 332, 334 (W.D.Ark.1971), aff’d, 454 F.2d 693 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 50 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972) (denial of indebtedness sufficient to raise defense of gift).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Edward Grady Partin, United States of America v. Harold Sykes, United States of America v. O. Romaine Russell, United States of America v. Don Marionneaux and Hugh Marionneaux
5th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see also · confidence low
The evidence also helped to put Russell and Baker's later relationship into perspective, which is a permissible purpose: "Evidence of behavior antedating the period covered by the indictment is generally admissible as bearing on the existence and purpose of the conspiracy and the significance of later behavior." United States v. Crockett, 514 F.2d 64, 72 (5th Cir. 1975); see also, e. g., United States v. Harrell, 436 F.2d 606 , 612 & n. 7 (5th Cir. 1970), appeal after remand, 458 F.2d 655 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 49 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972); United States v. Del Purgator…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Partin
5th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see also · confidence low
The evidence also helped to put Russell and Baker’s later relationship into perspective, which is a permissible purpose: “Evidence of behavior antedating the period covered by the indictment is generally admissible as bearing on the existence and purpose of the conspiracy and the significance of later behavior.” United States v. Crockett, 514 F.2d 64, 72 (5th Cir. 1975); see also, e. g., United States v. Harrell, 436 F.2d 606 , 612 & n. 7 (5th Cir. 1970), appeal after remand, 458 F.2d 655 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 49 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972); United States v. Del Pu…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Leonard Watson A/K/A 'Step'
unknown court · 1973 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Harrell, 436 F.2d 606, 612 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 49 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972); United States v. DeVore, 423 F.2d 1069, 1072 (4th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 950 , 91 S.Ct. 1604 , 29 L.Ed.2d 119 (1971); Kadis v. United States, 373 F.2d 370, 373-374 (1st Cir. 1966); Johnson v. United States, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 63 , 317 F.2d 127 , 129 n.2 (1963). 9 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Don Wade (2×)
9th Cir. · 1973 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, United States v. Handy, 454 F.2d 885 (9th Cir.), cert. den., 409 U.S. 846 , 93 S.Ct. 49 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972). 3 Appellant cannot challenge the validity of the district court's stated sanction for not submitting to an examination by court-appointed psychiatrists, since he complied with the order compelling examination.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Monroe, dba North Area Refuse Co.
v.
Cussen
No. 71-1507.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
409 U.S. 846
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.