green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.0 score
“camper truck”
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Attaway
(2×)
See State v. Valentine, 264 Or. 54 , 504 P.2d 84 (1972) (in banc), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 948 , 93 S.Ct. 3001 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1973); Sonnenreich & Ebner, supra, at 647 (arguing that elevation of rule of announcement to constitutional dimension in Ker was "historically unsound").
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bost
See State v. Valentine/Darroch, 264 Or. 54 , 504 P.2d 84 (1972), cert. den. 412 U.S. 948 , 93 S.Ct. 3001 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Davis
See State v. Valentine/Darroch, 264 Or. 54, 68 , 504 P.2d 84 , cert. den. 412 U.S. 948 , 93 S.Ct. 3001 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Peggy B. Jonas and Samuel Keith Jonas v. The City of Atlanta, Peggy B. Jonas and Samuel Keith Jonas v. Martha E. Wallace, \John\" F. N. U. Satterfield
See Rodriguez v. Jones, 473 F.2d 599 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 953 , 93 S.Ct. 3023 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1973); Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 456 F.2d 1339 (2d Cir. 1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Jonas v. City of Atlanta
See Rodriguez v. Jones, 473 F.2d 599 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 953 , 93 S.Ct. 3023 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1973); Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 456 F.2d 1339 (2d Cir. 1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hoyt Albert Gaultney, United States of America v. Gary Keith Steagald
(2×)
See generally Rodriguez v. Jones, 473 F.2d 599 , 605-06 n.3 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 953 , 93 S.Ct. 323 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hoyt Albert Gaultney, United States of America v. Gary Keith Steagald
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See 21 C.F.R. §§ 1308.23 -.24 1 Compare with Rodriguez v. Jones, 473 F.2d 599 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 412 U.S. 953 , 93 S.Ct. 3023 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1973) where informant had observed the subject enter the building 2 No address or name of resident was furnished by informant, but these were ascertained from the telephone company 3 The circuits are not in accord on this issue.
discussed
Cited "see"
Downs v. United States
See Rodriquez v. Jones, 473 F.2d 599 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 953 , 93 S.Ct. 3023 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1973); Whirl v. Kern, 407 F.2d 781 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 901 , 90 S.Ct. 210 , 24 L.Ed.2d 177 (1969); Foster v. United States, 296 F.2d 65 (5th Cir. 1961); Giacona v. United States, 257 F.2d 450 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 873 , 79 S.Ct. 113 , 3 L.Ed.2d 104 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas W. Donovan
(2×)
See United States v. Whitaker, 474 F.2d 1246 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 953 , 93 S.Ct. 3003 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1006 (1973). .
examined
Cited "see"
Alfred D. Schiaffo, in No. 72-2168 v. Henry Helstoski, in No. 72-2167
(4×)
See Hoellen v. Annunzio, 468 F.2d 522, 526 (7th Cir. 1972), petition for cert. filed, 412 U.S. 953 , 93 S.Ct. 3001 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kitzman
The court reasoned that the law limiting nighttime searches was "concerned with minimizing the heightened risks and apprehensions associated with a nighttime intrusion into the home, not with overall protection against unjustified searches and seizure of persons or property." Ibid.; see also State v. Valentine/Darroch, 264 Or. 54, 68 , 504 P.2d 84 (1972) (evidence obtained in violation of "knock and announce" statute was admissible), cert den, 412 U.S. 948 , 93 S.Ct. 3001 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald Finch
(2×)
See, e.g., Sabbath v. United States, 391 U.S. 585, 589 , 591 n. 8, 88 S.Ct. 1755, 1757 , 1759 n. 8, 20 L.Ed.2d 828 (1968) and Rodriguez v. Jones, 473 F.2d 599, 607 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 953 , 93 S.Ct. 3023 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1973).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Coalition to End the Permanent Congress v. Marvin T. Runyon, Donald K. Anderson
(4×)
See, e.g., Hoellen v. Annunzio, 468 F.2d 522 (7th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 953 , 93 S.Ct. 3001 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1006 (1973). 14 To forestall further lawsuits and even more flagrant abuses of the franking privilege, Congress enacted the Franking Act of 1973, Pub.L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Moreno v. Commonwealth
Bagley, 473 U.S. at 676 ; see also Stover v. Commonwealth, 211 Va. 789, 795 , 180 S.E.2d 504, 509 (1971), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 953 (1973); Va. Const, art.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Currie v. Commonwealth
In Brady v. Maryland , however, the Supreme Court held that “suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment.” 473 U.S. at 87; see also Stover v. Commonwealth, 211 Va. 789, 795 , 180 S.E.2d 504, 509 (1971), cert. de *209 nied, 412 U.S. 953 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Paul Groomer, United States of America v. Luis Jerome Markovich
Compare United States v. Santana, 427 U.S. 38 , 96 S.Ct. 2406 , 49 L.Ed.2d 300 (1976) and United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411 , 96 S.Ct. 820 , 46 L.Ed.2d 598 (1976), with United States v. Flores, 540 F.2d 432 (CA 9 1976), and Rodriguez v. Jones, 473 F.2d 599 (CA 5), cert. denied , 412 U.S. 953 , 93 S.Ct. 3023 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Annunzio
v.
Hoellen
v.
Hoellen
No. 72-1090.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 18, 1973.
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.