green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Howell v. Hecht
See Ex parte Howell, 488 S.W.2d 123, 127 (Tex.Crim.App.1972), cert. dism’d, 414 U.S. 803 , 94 S.Ct. 114 , 38 L.Ed.2d 38 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Invention Marketing, Inc. v. Spannaus
See, Schwartz v. Talmo, 295 Minn. 356 , 205 N.W.2d 318 (1973), appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 803 , 94 S.Ct. 130 , 38 L.Ed.2d 39 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Weinstock v. Town of Hull
See Frost v. Commissioner of Corps. & Taxn. 363 Mass. 235, 247-249 (1973), app. dism. for want of substantial Federal question, 414 U. S. 803 (1973); Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co. 301 U. S. 495, 509 (1937); San Antonio Independent Sch.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Page v. Commissioner of Revenue
See also Frost v. Commissioner of Corps. & Taxation, 363 Mass. 235, 245 , appeals dismissed, 414 U.S. 803 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Massachusetts Teachers Ass'n v. Secretary of the Commonwealth
See, e.g., Frost v. Commissioner of Corps & Taxation, 363 Mass. 235, 251-253 , appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 803 (1973). 28 *241 The plaintiffs’ challenge to the renter’s deduction as a violation of art. 44’s requirement of uniformity is more substantial.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Winona v. Policeman's Relief Ass'n of Winona
XIV, § 1, requires: See, also, Schwartz v. Taimo, 295 Minn. 356 , 205 N.W.2d 318 , appeal dismissed 414 U.S. 803 , 94 S.Ct. 130 , 38 L.Ed.2d 39 (1973). “ * * * that a legislative classification apply uniformly to all persons similarly situated, and that the distinctions which separate those who are included in a classification from those who are not must not be arbitrary or fanciful, but rather must be natural and reasonable.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Howell
v.
Jones, Sheriff
v.
Jones, Sheriff
No. 72-1448.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Appeal from Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Motion of Criminal Trial Lawyers Association of Northern California for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question.