green
Positive treatment
0.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. United States
See also Snead v. Dept. of Social Services of City of New York, 355 F.Supp. 764, 772 (S.D.N.Y.1973) (3-judge court), vacated 416 U.S. 977 , 94 S.Ct. 2376 , 40 L.Ed.2d 755 (1974), reaff'd 389 F.Supp. 935 (1974), vacated for consideration of mootness, 421 U.S. 982 , 95 S.Ct. 1985 , 44 L.Ed.2d 474 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Siletti v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
See, e. g., Snead v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York, 355 F.Supp. 764 (S.D.N.Y.1973), vacated and remanded, 416 U.S. 977 , 94 S.Ct. 2376 , 40 L.Ed.2d 755 (1974); Kabelka v. City of New York, 353 F.Supp. 7 (S.D.N.Y.1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pope
v.
Nebraska
v.
Nebraska
No. 73-6207.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 13, 1974.
Appeal, Certiorari, Consideration, Illinois, Issue, Jeopardy, Jurisdiction, Light, Papers, Set, Took, Treat, Want, Writ.
Published
Appeal from Süp. Ct. Neb. dismissed for want.of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas would dismiss appeal for want of jurisdiction, treat the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, and set case for oral argument on issue of double jeopardy in light of the dissents in which he joined in Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U. S. 121, 150, 164. Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration' or decision of this case.