green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.6 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Fried II”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Pattioay
(2×)
See United States v. Walden, 490 F.2d 372, 376-77 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 983 , 94 S.Ct. 2385 , 40 L.Ed.2d 760 rehearing denied, 417 U.S. 977 , 94 S.Ct. 3187 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kim v. State
(2×)
Accord United States v. Walden, 490 F.2d 372, 373, 376 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 983 , 94 S.Ct. 2385 , 40 L.Ed.2d 760 r'hng denied, 417 U.S. 977 , 94 S.Ct. 3187 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1974) (Navy regulation incorporating Act "innocently" violated by wilful use of military personnel to make illegal weapons purchases undercover); State v. Danko, 219 Kan. 490 , 548 P.2d 819, 822 (1976) (Act may be violated despite officers’ apparent ignorance of Act’s proscription).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jason Lustig and Kevin Lee, Kevin Lee
See United States v. Walden, 490 F.2d 372, 376-77 (4th Cir.) (neither reversal of conviction nor application of exclusionary rule warranted by unauthorized use of Navy personnel in investigation resulting in indictment), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 983 , 94 S.Ct. 2385 , 40 L.Ed.2d 760 (1984); see also United States v. Wolffs, 594 F.2d 77, 85 (5th Cir.1979) (assuming use of military personnel in investigation unauthorized, application of exclusionary rule inappropriate).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Presgraves
See United States v. Walden, 490 F.2d 372 (4th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 983 , 94 S.Ct. 2385 , 40 L.Ed.2d 760 (1974). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Maxwell
See United States v. Walden, 490 F.2d 372, 374 (4th Cir.1974) cert. denied, 416 U.S. 983 , 94 S.Ct. 2385 , 40 L.Ed.2d 760 (1974). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Harker v. State
See generally United States v. Walden, 490 F.2d 372, 375-77 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 983 , 94 S.Ct. 2385 , 40 L.Ed.2d 760 (1974); Wrynn v. United States, 200 F.Supp. 457, 464 (E.D.N.Y.1961), quoting Gillars v. United States, 182 F.2d 962, 972 (D.C.Cir.1950).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael A. Wolffs
Accord United States v. Walden, 490 F.2d 372 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 983 , 94 S.Ct. 2385 , 40 L.Ed.2d 760 (1974) (although court found use of marines as undercover investigators violated Navy regulations and spirit, but not letter, of Posse Comitatus Act, exclusionary rule not applied because such an extraordinary remedy not required until such time as repeated cases involving military enforcement of civil laws demonstrates a need for such sanction); State v. Danko, 219 Kan. 490 , 548 P.2d 819 (1976) (although court found violation of Posse Comitatus Act where military officer, on j…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Eugene Banks
See Red Feather, supra, and United States v. Walden, 490 F.2d 372 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 983 , 94 S.Ct. 2385 , 40 L.Ed.2d 760 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. State
See also United States v. Walden, 490 F.2d 372, 376-377 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 983 , 94 S.Ct. 2385 , 40 L.Ed.2d 760 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Use of Navy Drug-Detecting Dogs by Civilian Postal Inspectors
See also United States v. Walden, 490 F.2d 372, 374-76 (4th Cir.), cert, denied, 416 U.S. 983 (1974) (suggesting that omission o f Navy was a drafting oversight but conceding that Navy actions would not violate the letter of the Act).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Luis Lazaro Borrego and Jose O. Paulet
See, e.g., United States v. Walden, 490 F.2d 372 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 983 , 94 S.Ct. 2385 , 40 L.Ed.2d 760 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Kenneth Roberts, AKA Harold Weber, United States of America v. Clifton Lee Hawk
See, e.g., United States v. Wolffs, 594 F.2d 77, 85 (5th Cir.1979) (Wolffs)-, United States v. Walden, 490 F.2d 372, 376-77 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 983 , 94 S.Ct. 2385 , 40 L.Ed.2d 760 (1974) (Walden).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Hamilton
See, e.g., United States v. Walden, 490 F.2d 372 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 983 , 94 S.Ct. 2385 , 40 L.Ed.2d 760 (1974); United States v. De-Vaughn, 414 F.Supp. 774 (D.Md.1976), aff'd, 556 F.2d 575 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 954 , 98 S.Ct. 479 , 54 L.Ed.2d 312 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Owens
See also Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 154 , 31 L.Ed.2d 104 , 92 S.Ct. 763 .) On the contrary, it has been repeatedly held by the Federal courts in these cases of inadvertent or negligent nondisclosure, "that a new trial may be ordered only upon a showing that there is a significant chance that the nondisclosed item, developed by skillful counsel, could have induced a reasonable doubt in the minds of enough jurors to avoid a conviction." United States v. Fried (2d Cir.1973), 486 F.2d 201, 203 , cert. denied, 416 U.S. 983 , 40 L.Ed.2d 759 , 94 S.Ct. 2385 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Amax Fly Ash Corp. v. United States
Compare, Technical Development Corp. v. United States, 202 Ct. Cl. 237 (1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 983 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Walden et vir
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 73-1216.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 13, 1974.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.