green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.5 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“reasonabl(y) susceptible”
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Company v. United Transportation Union
reasonabl(y) susceptible
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United Transportation Union v. Penn Central Transportation Company
reasonably susceptible
discussed
Cited "see"
Local 553, Transport Workers Union of America, Afl-Cio v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
See Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. United Transportation Union, 491 F.2d 830, 833 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 985 , 94 S.Ct. 2389 , 40 L.Ed.2d 762 (1974); United Transportation Union v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 458 F.2d 354, 357 (8th Cir.1972). 3 Perhaps because of the difficulties that arise in determining whether an agreement arguably supports a carrier’s actions, the Supreme Court has occasionally taken a *674 more pragmatic approach to decide, in close cases, whether a dispute is major or minorIn Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad Co. v. United Transportation Union, 39…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Soney
See State v. Tradewell, 9 Wash. App. 821, 824 , 515 P. 2d 172, 174 (Ct.App. 1973), cert. den. 416 U.S. 985 , 94 S.Ct. 2388 , 40 L.Ed. 2d 762 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wareham v. Jeffes
See e.g., Curtis v. Everette, 489 F.2d 516 (3rd Cir. 1973) (commonwealth and Bureau of Corrections not “persons” for purposes of section 1983), cert. denied, Smith v. Curtis, 416 U.S. 985 (1974); Mattas v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 576 F.Supp. 1178 (W.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Board of Education v. Ambach
However, “[tjhere is no requirement in the law that all school districts, as school districts, be treated alike and the fact that the operation of [a] statute results in some inequities does not make it violative of the equal protection clause” (O’Donnell v Antin, 81 Misc 2d 849, 853 , affd 36 NY2d 941 , app dsmd for want of substantial Federal question 423 US 919 ), and there is considerable doubt that a case like this presents any question concerning the Federal constitutional guarantee (San Antonio School Dist. v Rodriguez, 411 US 1 ; see, also, Becker v Levitt, 489 F2d 1087, cert den…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Board of Commissioners for Yakima County
(2×)
See, e.g., Becker v. Levitt, 489 F.2d 1087, 1091 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 985 , 40 L.Ed.2d 762 , 94 S.Ct. 2388 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ronald Burbank v. John Twomey
See also Aurora Education Ass’n v. Board of Education, 490 F.2d 431, 435 (7th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 985 , 94 S.Ct. 2388 , 40 L.Ed.2d 762 (1974).
Mead
v.
Horvitz Publishing Co.
v.
Horvitz Publishing Co.
No. 73-1388.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 13, 1974.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1) · Seventh Circuit (1)
Ct. App. Ohio, Lorain County. Certiorari denied.