green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.4 score
“the purpose of 18 u.s.c. sec. 1341 is to prevent the postal service from being used to carry out fraudulent schemes, regardless of what is the exact nature of the scheme and regardless of whether it happens to be forbidded by state law.”
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Nicholas L. Monica, Jr.
the purpose of 18 u.s.c. sec. 1341 is to prevent the postal service from being used to carry out fraudulent schemes, regardless of what is the exact nature of the scheme and regardless of whether it happens to be forbidded by state law.
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin v. State
See In re Martin-Trigona, 55 Ill.2d 301 , 302 N.E.2d 68 (1973) (noting that Martin lacked the qualities of responsibility, candor, fairness, self-restraint, objectivity, and respect for the judicial system as well as having a propensity to unreasonably react against anyone he believed opposed him), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 2605 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974). [4] In this published opinion, the United States Supreme Court denied Attwood's request to proceed in forma pauperis in that case and prospectively as a sanction for filing frivolous petitions.
cited
Cited "see"
Martin v. State
See Martin v. Marko, 651 So.2d 819 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)(quoting In re Martin-Trigona, 55 Ill.2d 301 , 302 N.E.2d 68 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 2605 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974)).
cited
Cited "see"
Nelson v. United States
See William Green Const. Co. v. United States, 477 F.2d 930, 936-37 , 201 Ct.Cl. 616, 626-27 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 2606 , 41 L.Ed.2d 213 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
McNally v. United States
(2×)
See Badders v. United States, 240 U. S. 391 . . . (1916).” United States v. States, 488 F. 2d 761, 767 (CA8 1973), cert. denied, 417 U. S. 909 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re New Haven Radio, Inc.
See In re Martin-Trigona, 55 Ill.2d 301 , 302 N.E.2d 68 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 2605 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Malnak
See William Green Construction Co. v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 616 , 477 F.2d 930 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 909 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin Mandel, United States of America v. W. Dale Hess, United States of America v. Harry W. Rodgers, Iii, United States of America v. William A. Rodgers, United States of America v. Irvin Kovens, United States of America v. Ernest N. Cory, Jr., United States of America v. W. Dale Hess, Harry W. Rodgers, Iii, and William A. Rodgers
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. States, 488 F.2d 761, 764 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. den., 417 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 2605 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mandel
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. States, 488 F.2d 761, 764 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. den., 417 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 2605 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth O. Brown
(2×)
See United States v. States, 488 F.2d 761, 764-66 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 909 , 950, 94 S.Ct. 2605 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Caruso
See, e.g., United States v. States, 488 F.2d 761, 766-67 (8th Cir.1973) (rejecting argument that mail fraud prosecution improperly intervened in state affairs, because “the focus of the statute is upon misuse of the Postal Service, not the regulation of state affairs, and Congress clearly has the authority to regulate such misuse of the mails.”) (citation omitted), cert. *388 denied, 417 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 2605 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974); see also United States v. Porcelli 865 F.2d 1352, 1359 (2d Cir.1989) (noting in dicta that the broad federal mail .statute punishes “any scheme or artifi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paradies
See also United States v. Martinez, 905 F.2d 709, 715 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1017 , v. States, 488 F.2d 761 (8th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 2605 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974); Shushan v. United States, 117 F.2d 110 (5th Cir.1941), cert. denied, 313 U.S. 574 , 61 S.Ct. 1085 , 1086, 85 L.Ed. 1531, 1532 (1941); see also, United States v. McNally, 790 F.2d 1290 (6th Cir.1986) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mandel
See, e.g., United States v. States, 488 F.2d 761, 764 (8th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 2605 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re New Haven Grand Jury
For some background on Martin-Trigona’s abuse of the judicial process, often characterized by harassment of individuals with whom he has had only the slightest contact, see In re Martin-Trigona, 737 F.2d 1254 (2d Cir.1984); see also In re Martin-Trigona, 55 Ill.2d 301 , 302 N.E.2d 68 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 2605 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974); In re Martin-Trigona, 573 F.Supp. 1245 (D.Conn.1983); In re Martin-Trigona, 592 F.Supp. 1566 (D.Conn.1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Di Ventura
See, e.g., United States v. States, 488 F. 2d 761 (8 Cir.1973), cert. den. 417 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 2605 , 41 L.Ed. 2d 212 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eugene Boffa, Sr., Robert Boffa, Sr., Louis S. Kalmar, Sr., and Chandler Lemon
See, e.g., United States v. States, 488 F.2d 761, 763-64 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 2605 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974); United States v. Lewis, 514 F.Supp. 169, 172-77 (M.D.Pa.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kisco Co. v. United States
See also, William Green Construction Co. v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 616, 624-25 , 477 F.2d 930, 935 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 909 (1974); Bailey Specialized Buildings, Inc. v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 71, 86 , 404 F.2d 355, 363 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mandel
See, e.g., United States v. States, 488 F.2d 761, 764 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 2605 , 41 L.Ed.2d 212 (1974). 5 *1011 Undaunted, the defendants suggest that a close reading of representative mail fraud cases indicates that courts have limited the reach of the statute to those schemes which contemplate an injury definable in terms of economic harm or pecuniary loss, citing, inter alia, Hammerschmidt v. Únited States, 265 U.S, 182, 44 S.Ct. 511 , 68 L.Ed. 968 (1924); United States v. Randle, 39 F.Supp. 759 (W.D.La.1941); Epstein v. United States, supra; United State…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Squire
v.
Virginia
v.
Virginia
No. 73-1204.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 28, 1974.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
Sup. Ct. Va. Cer-tiorari denied.