green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gray
See United States v. Rizzo, 492 F.2d 443, 447 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 944 , 94 S.Ct. 3069 , 41 L.Ed.2d 665 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gallegos
See United States v. Rizzo, 492 F.2d 443, 446 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 944 , 94 S.Ct. 3069 , 41 L.Ed.2d 299 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James M. McCoy
See United States v. Rizzo, 2 Cir. 1974, 492 F.2d 443, 447 , cert. denied, 417 U.S. 944 , 94 S.Ct. 3069 , 41 L.Ed.2d 665 ; United States v. Manfredi, 2 Cir. 1973, 488 F.2d 588, 601-02 , cert. denied, 417 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 2651 , 41 L.Ed.2d 240 . 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Madori
"In sum, while it is desirable for the prosecutors to meet the ninety-day notice requirement, we again hold that a failure to strictly observe the time limitation puts the burden on the defendant to show that he was prejudiced” (United States v Fury, supra, at 529; see also, United States v Rizzo, 492 F2d 443, 447, cert denied 417 US 944 ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Williams
See also United States v. Rizzo, 492 F.2d 443, 448 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 417 U.S. 944 (1974); United States v. Nashawaty, 571 F.2d 71, 75 (1st Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Raymond D. Masciarelli and Lawrence Schultz
See also United States v. Rizzo, 492 F.2d 443, 447 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 944 , 94 S.Ct. 3069 , 41 L.Ed.2d 665 (1974); United States v. Moore, 168 U.S.App.D.C. 227 , 513 F.2d 485, 502 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Isadore Marion
(2×)
See also United States v. Rizzo, 492 F.2d 443, 447 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 944 , 94 S.Ct. 3069 , 41 L.Ed.2d 665 (1974) (evidence of counterfeiting intercepted pursuant to state wiretap authorization, subsequent approval by reference to renewal papers). 10 By its holding that the original order was, in effect, amended by reference to renewal application papers, the Tortorello panel recognized that the statute’s require ments did have to be met despite the similar nature of the offenses involved. 11 In this fashion, the requisite judicial approval for the incidental interceptions of …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. Martin
(2×)
See also American Civil Liberties Union v. Jennings, 366 F.Supp. 1041 (D.D.C.1973) (3-judge court), 417 U.S. 944 , 94 S.Ct. 3066 , 41 L.Ed.2d 664 (1974), vacated, sub nom Staats v. ACLU, 422 U.S. 1030 , 95 S.Ct. 2646 , 45 L.Ed.2d 686 (1975); United States v. Finance Committee to Reelect the President, 165 U.S.App.D.C. 371 , 507 F.2d 1194, 1200-02 (1974). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Citizens Committee To Save Wefm v. Federal Communications Commission
Compare note 56 infra. I have recently struggled with the difficult constitutional problems in this area, see American Civil Liberties Union v. Jennings, 366 F.Supp. 1051 (D.D.C.1973), prob. juris. noted sub nom., Staats v. American Civil Liberties Union, 417 U.S. 944 , 94 S.Ct. 3066 , 41 L.Ed.2d 664 (1974), and have noted the recent guilty pleas entered by individuals and corporations for conduct which on its face at least seems within First Amendment protection.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Citizens Committee to Save WEFM v. Federal Communications Commission
Compare note 56 infra. I have recently struggled with the difficult constitutional problems in this area, see American Civil Liberties Union v. Jennings, 366 F.Supp. 1051 (D.D.C.1973), prob. juris. noted sub nom., Staats v. American Civil Liberties Union, 417 U.S. 944 , 94 S.Ct. 3066 , 41 L.Ed.2d 664 (1974), and have noted the recent guilty pleas entered by individuals and corporations for conduct which on its face at least seems within First Amendment protection.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DiLorenzo
v.
United States Salli v. United States and Rizzo v. United States
v.
United States Salli v. United States and Rizzo v. United States
No. 73-1451; No. 73-6361; No. 73-6377.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 10, 1974.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.