green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Alston v. Town of Brookline
See Roy v. City of Augusta , 712 F.2d 1517 , 1521 (1st Cir. 1983) (quoting Lovely v. Laliberte , 498 F.2d 1261 , 1263 (1st Cir.) ), cert denied , 419 U.S. 1038 , 95 S.Ct. 526 , 42 L.Ed.2d 316 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hovey
A. Subdelegation is Proper Subdelegation of power by the Attorney General is specifically authorized by section 510 of title 28, which confers power on the Attorney General to delegate functions vested in him by Congress. 28 U.S.C. § 510 (1982); see United States v. Nocar, 497 F.2d 719, 723 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1038 , 95 S.Ct. 526 , 42 L.Ed.2d 315 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Boeglin
(2×)
See In re Weir, 377 F.Supp. 919 (S.D.Cal.), aff'd., 495 F.2d 879 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1038 , 95 S.Ct. 525 , 42 L.Ed.2d 315 (1974).
examined
Cited "see"
Castorr Et Al. v. Brundage Et Al.
(3×)
See Lovely v. Laliberte, 498 F. 2d 1261 (CA1), cert. denied, 419 U. S. 1038 (1974); Jennings v. Caddo Parish School Bd., 531 F. 2d 1331 (CA5 1976); Robbins v. District Court, 592 F. 2d 1015 (CA8 1979); Scoggin v. Schrunk, 522 F. 2d 436 (CA9 1975), cert. denied, 423 U. S. 1066 (1976); Spence v. Latting, 512 F. 2d 93 (CA10), cert. denied, 423 U. S. 896 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Louis v. Nelson
(2×)
See note 14, infra. Pesikoff v. Sec. of Labor, 501 F.2d 757 , 760 n.3 (D.C.Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1038 , 95 S.Ct. 525 , 42 L.Ed.2d 315 (1974). 39 .
examined
Cited "see"
San Francisco Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 6
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See the legislative history set forth in Pesikoff v. Secretary of Labor, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 197, 201-202 , 501 F.2d 757, 761-762 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1038 , 95 S.Ct. 525 , 42 L.Ed.2d 315 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Sylvander v. New England Home for Little Wanderers
See Lovely v. Laliberte, 498 F.2d 1261 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1038 , 95 S.Ct. 526 , 42 L.Ed.2d 316 (1974); P. I.
cited
Cited "see"
Demetri Thor v. United States
See United States v. Nocar, 497 F.2d 719, 723 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1038 , 95 S.Ct. 526 , 42 L.Ed.2d 315 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nazario Castaneda-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
See Pesikoff v. Secretary of Labor, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 197, 204 , 501 F.2d 757 , 761 n. 5, cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1038 , 95 S.Ct. 525 , 42 L.Ed.2d 315 (1974), quoting Secretary of Labor v. Farino, 490 F.2d 885, 889-90 (7th Cir. 1973); accord, Ratnayake v. Mack, 499 F.2d 1207, 1210-11 (8th Cir. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Balaji Doraiswamy v. Secretary of Labor. Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. v. The Secretary of Labor
(2×)
See Pesikoff v. Secretary of Labor, 163 U.S. App.D.C. 197, 501 F.2d 757 , cert, denied, 419 U.S. 1038 , 95 S.Ct. 525 , 42 L.Ed.2d 315 (1974); Acupuncture Center v. Dunlop, 543 F.2d 852 (D.C.Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 62 , 50 L.Ed.2d 78 (1976). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Monroe
See United States v. Nocar, 497 F.2d 719, 723 (7th Cir.) cert. denied 419 U.S. 1038 , 95 S.Ct. 526 , 42 L.Ed.2d 315 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hathaway v. City of Claremont
Shepherd v. Town of Westmoreland, 130 N.H. 542, 544 , 543 A.2d 922, 923 (1988), or where the roles of the parties (plaintiff and defendant) in the two actions are reversed, see Laconia N a t 11 Bank v. Lavallee, 96 N.H. 353, 355 (1950); see also Lovely v. Laliberte, 498 F.2d 1261, 1263 (1st Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1038 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of America
See Nilsen v. City of Moss Point, 701 F.2d 556, 562 (5th Cir.1983) (en banc); see also Lovely v. Laliberte, 498 F.2d 1261, 1263 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1038 , 95 S.Ct. 526 , 42 L.Ed.2d 316 (1974); cf. Fiumara v. Fireman’s Fund Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bunge Corp. v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Pesikoff v. Secretary of Labor, 501 F.2d 757 , 763-64 n. 12 (D.C.Cir.) (“[plaintiff] would have stood in no better stead if he had had notice”), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1038 , 95 S.Ct. 525 , 42 L.Ed.2d 315 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Barrett v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board of the Commonwealth
See, e.g., Lovely v. Laliberte, 498 F.2d 1261 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1038 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Toby Nason v. Kennebec County Ceta, and F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, Kennebec County Ceta, a Governmental Agency of the Department of Labor v. Raymond Marshall, Secretary, Department of Labor
(2×)
Compare Gosman v. United States, 573 F.2d 31, 39-40 (Ct.Cl.1978) (citing cases) and Pesikoff v. Secretary, 501 F.2d 757 , 763 n.12 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1038 , 95 S.Ct. 525 , 42 L.Ed.2d 315 (1974) (finding agency rules to be interpretative) with Aiken v. Obledo, 442 F.Supp. 628, 648-49 (E.D.Cal.1977) (agency rules found not to be interpretative) (citing cases).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nason v. Kennebec County Ceta
(2×)
Compare Gosman v. United States, 573 F.2d 31, 39-40 (Ct.C1.1978) (citing cases) and Pesikoff v. Secretary, 501 F.2d 757 , 763 n.12 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1038 , 95 S.Ct. 525 , 42 L.Ed.2d 315 (1974) (finding agency rules to be interpretative) with Aiken v. Obledo, 442 F.Supp. 628, 648-49 (E.D.Cal.1977) (agency rules found not to be interpretative) (citing cases).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Citizens to Save Spencer County v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama Power Company, American Petroleum Institute, Sierra Club, Bf Goodrich Company, American Paper Institute, Hoosier Energy Division, Mountain Fuel Supply Company, Montana Power Co., Natural Resources Council of Maine, Pittston Co., Intervenors. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Montana Power Co., Intervenors. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Council of Maine, Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Bf Goodrich Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Hampton Roads Energy Company v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Northern Cheyenne Tribe, Sierra Club, and Friends of the Earth v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Montana Power Company v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pittston Company, Colorado Interstate Gas Co., Ideal Basic Industries, Inc., Intervenors. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, the Pittston Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, American Paper Institute and the National Forest Products Association v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Manufacturing Chemists Association, Chemical Products Corporation, Dow Chemical Company, Fmc Corporation, Monsanto Company, Ppg Industries, Inc., Rohm and Haas Company, Stauffer Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation, Allied Chemical Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama By-Products Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Koppers Company, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of Epa, Usm Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Epa
(2×)
See also Joseph v. United States Civil Service Comm'n, 180 U.S.App.D.C. 281, 294 , 554 F.2d 1140, 1153 (1977) (interpretive rule entails "clarification of statutory language") 153 Pesikoff v. Secretary of Labor, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 197, 203 , 501 F.2d 757 , 763 n.12 (1974), Cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1038 , 95 S.Ct. 525 , 42 L.Ed.2d 315 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stenographic MacHines Inc. v. Regional Administrator for Employment and Training (A/k/a Regional Manpower Administrator) of the United States Department of Labor, Mohammed Abdul Rahman v. Regional Administrator for Employment and Training (A/k/a Regional Manpower Administrator) of the United States Department of Labor
(2×)
Compare Silva v. Secretary of Labor, 518 F.2d 301 (1st Cir. 1975), with Pesikoff v. Secretary of Labor, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 197 , 501 F.2d 757 , Cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1038 , 95 S.Ct. 525 , 42 L.Ed.2d 315 (1974) 9 The record does not show by what authority Mr. Zabarae spoke for the local union or how he acquired the information he passed on to the analyst.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bennun v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF RUTGERS, ETC.
See, e. g., Lovely v. Laliberte, 498 F.2d 1261 (1st Cir. 1974), cert. denied 419 U.S. 1038 , 95 *1279 S.Ct. 526, 42 L.Ed.2d 316 (1974); Davis v. Towe, 379 F.Supp. 536 (E.D.Va.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chinese American Civic Council v. Attorney General
(2×)
See, e.g., Pesikoff v. Secretary of Labor, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 197 , 501 F.2d 757, 760-61 , cert, denied, 419 U.S. 1038 , 95 S.Ct. 525 , 42 L.Ed.2d 315 (1974); Secretary of Labor v. Farino, 490 F.2d 885, 888-90 (7th Cir. 1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Verville, Administrator
v.
Botsford General Hospital
v.
Botsford General Hospital
No. 74-5364.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 25, 1974.
Published
Sup. Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied.