green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Dennis Housing Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
See Mahoney v. Board of Appeals of Winchester, 366 Mass. 228, 232-233 (1974), appeal dismissed, 420 U.S. 903 (1975); Board of Appeals of Hanover v. Housing Appeals Comm., supra at 354-355, 364-365; G.
discussed
Cited "see"
McKee v. Likins
See, Hodgson v. Anderson, 378 F.Supp. 1008 (D.Minn. 1974), appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction sub nom, Spannaus v. Hodgson, 420 U.S. 903 , 95 S.Ct. 819 , 42 L.Ed.2d 832 (1975), affirmed in part, reversed in part sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Mouton
See Daniel v. Louisiana, 420 U.S. 31 , 95 S.Ct. 704 , 42 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975) and Devall v. Louisiana, 420 U.S. 903 , 94 S.Ct. 820 , 42 L.Ed.2d 832 (1974) (a woman codefendant), see also State v. Rester, 309 So.2d 321 (La.1975). (2) The defendant alleges that the jury venires were invalid under existing state law because, in fact, a non-volunteer woman had been added.
discussed
Cited "see"
Planned Parenthood Association v. Fitzpatrick
(2×)
See, for example, Hodgson v. Anderson, 378 F.Supp. 108 (D.Minn.1974), appeal dismissed, 420 U.S. 903 , 95 S.Ct. 819 , 42 L.Ed.2d 832 (1975); and Leigh v. Olson, 385 F.Supp. 255 (D.N.D.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodos v. Michaelson
See Hodgson v. Anderson, 378 F. Supp. 1008, 1016 (D.Minn.1974), remanded to 8th Cir. sub nom., Spannaus v. Hodgson, 420 U.S. 903 , 95 S.Ct. 819 , 42 L.Ed.2d 832 (1975) ; Doe v. Rampton, supra. Cf. Nyberg v. City of Virginia, 495 F.2d 1342 (8th Cir. 1974), appeal dismissed, 419 U.S. 891 , 95 S.Ct. 169 , 42 L.Ed. 136 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Milton Commons Assoc. v. BD. OF APP. OF MILTON
See also Mahoney v. Board of Appeals of Winchester, 366 Mass. 228, 232-233 (1974), appeal dismissed, 420 U.S. 903 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stubblefield
v.
Tennessee
v.
Tennessee
No. 73-6598.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 27, 1975.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Appeal from Ct. App. Tenn. dismissed for want of substantial federal question. See Daniel v. Louisiana, ante, p. 31.