Singleton v. Wulff, 422 U.S. 1041 (1975). · Go Syfert
Search
Singleton v. Wulff, 422 U.S. 1041 (1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Doe v. Beal (ca3, 1975-07-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Doe v. Beal
3rd Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wulff v. Singleton, 508 F.2d 1211 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. granted, 422 U.S. 1041 , 95 S.Ct. 2655 , 45 L.Ed.2d 692 (1975); Doe v. Rose, 499 F.2d 1112 (10th Cir. 1974); Doe v. Myatt, Civ.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." District of Columbia v. Russell E. Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency
D.C. Cir. · 1976 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Kentucky v. Ruckelshaus, 497 F.2d 1172 (6th Cir. 1974), cert, granted sub nom., Hancock v. Train, 420 U.S. 971 , 95 S.Ct. 1390 , 43 L.Ed.2d 650 (1975) (substantive only), with People of St. of Calif., etc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 511 F.2d 963 (9th Cir.), cert. *1253 granted 422 U.S. 1041 , 95 S.Ct. 2655 , 45 L.Ed.2d 693 (1975), and Alabama v. Seeber, 502 F.2d 1238 (5th Cir. 1974) (substantive and procedural). 7 . 42 U.S.C. § 1857f.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Singleton, Chief, Bureau of Medical Services, Department of Health and Welfare of Missouri
v.
Wulff
No. 74-1393.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 23, 1975.
422 U.S. 1041
Below, Consideration, Took.
Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition which read as follows:

“1. Whether there is a logical nexus between the status of respondent-physicians and the claims they seek to have adjudicated sufficient to confer standing on them to challenge the constitutionality of Section 208.152, RSMo Supp. 1973.
“2. Whether the Court of Appeals acted in excess of its jurisdiction when it proceeded to determine on the merits the constitutionality of Section 208.152, RSMo Supp. 1973.”
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 508 F. 2d 1211.