green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Bumgardner v. Lite Cellular, Inc.
See Greenway v. Information Dynamics, Ltd., 399 F.Supp. 1092 (D.Ariz.1974), aff'd per curiam, 524 F.2d 1145 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied 424 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 1153 , 47 L.Ed.2d 344 (1976); Wenger v. Trans Union Corp., No. 95-6445 (C.D.Cal.
discussed
Cited "see"
Scott v. Real Estate Finance Group
REFG Mem. of law at 4-5 (“Real Estate Finance [REFG] had no pending business transactions with the Plaintiffs, nor had [REFG] ever spoken to or communicated with the Plaintiffs at any time.... [REFG] and the Plaintiffs did not, in fact, have a consumer relationship ... regarding a specific business transaction between them ...”). “[T]he absence of a consumer relationship between the requesting party and the subject of the credit report requires the court to find that the requesting party did not have a permissible purpose to obtain the report.” Daley, 943 F.Supp. at 468 ; see also Houg…
discussed
Cited "see"
Estiverne v. Sak's Fifth Avenue
See Greenway v. Information Dynamics, Ltd., 399 F.Supp. 1092 (D.Ariz.1974) (holding that lists with check cashing history of potential eus- *1174 tomers is a consumer report under the FCRA), aff'd, 524 F.2d 1145 (9th Cir.1975), cert. dismissed, 424 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 1153 , 47 L.Ed.2d 344 (1976); Peasley v. Telecheck of Kan., Inc., 6 Kan.App.2d 990 , 637 P.2d 437 (1981) (holding that check approval system is a consumer report under Kansas statute that is modeled after the FCRA).
discussed
Cited "see"
Latin American Sales International, Inc. v. State, Department of Revenue
See Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages, 423 U.S. 276 , 96 S.Ct. 535 , 46 L.Ed.2d 495 , reh’g denied, 424 U.S. 935 , 96 S.Ct. 1151 , 47 L.Ed.2d 344 (1976); Empresa Siderurgica, S.A. v. County of Merced, 337 U.S. 154 , 69 S.Ct. 995 , 93 L.Ed. 1276 (1949); State Dep’t of Revenue v. Anderson, 403 So.2d 397 (Fla.1981); Fred McGilvray, Inc. v. Askew, 340 So.2d 475 (Fla.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
District of Columbia v. W. Bell & Co., Inc.
See Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages, 423 U.S. 276, 290 , 96 S.Ct. 535, 543 , 46 L.Ed.2d 495 , reh. denied, 424 U.S. 935 , 96 S.Ct. 1151 , 47 L.Ed.2d 344 (1976); Miller Bros.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Howell
v.
Jones, Sheriff
v.
Jones, Sheriff
No. 72-1448.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1976.
Consideration, Motion, Took.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
414 U. S. 803 and 1052. Motion for leave to file second petition for rehearing denied.
Mr. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.