green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles L. Boals, Cross-Appellant v. Frank H. Gray, Superintendent, Ohio State Reformatory, Cross-Appellee
(2×)
See Muscare v. Quinn, 520 F.2d 1212, 1215 (7th Cir.1975), cert. dismissed, 425 U.S. 560 , 96 S.Ct. 1752 , 48 L.Ed.2d 165 (1976); Bagby v. Beal, 455 F.Supp. 881, 888 (N.D.Pa.1978).
examined
Cited "see"
Russell v. Harrison
(3×)
See Andrews v. Drew Municipal Separate School District, 507 F.2d 611 (5th Cir.1975), cert. granted, 423 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 33 , 46 L.Ed.2d 37 , cert. dismissed, 425 U.S. 559 , 96 S.Ct. 1752 , 48 L.Ed.2d 169 (1976) (arbitrary denial of opportunity to qualify for public position); Lucas v. Chapman, 430 F.2d 945 (5th Cir.1970) (arbitrary dismissal from public employment).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Warner
See Quinn v. Muscare, 425 U.S. 560 , 96 S.Ct. 1752 , 48 L.Ed.2d 165 (1976) (certiorari dismissed where, subsequent to grant of writ, developments in law make review unnecessary).
discussed
Cited "see"
East Hartford Education Association v. Board of Education of the Town of East Hartford
See Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 , 92 S.Ct. 2294 , 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972) 12 In Quinn v. Muscare, 425 U.S. 560 , 96 S.Ct. 1752 , 48 L.Ed.2d 165 (1976), the Supreme Court, in considering the validity of the Chicago Fire Department's "personal appearance regulation" stated: "Kelley v. Johnson renders immaterial the District Court's factual determination regarding the safety justification for the Department's hair regulation about which the Court of Appeals expressed doubt." Id. at 562-63 , 96 S.Ct. at 1753.
discussed
Cited "see"
Aiello v. City of Wilmington, Del.
See Muscare v. Quinn, 520 F.2d 1212 , 1216 n.4 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 425 U.S. 560 , 96 S.Ct. 1752 , 48 L.Ed.2d 165 (1976); Mattern v. Weinberger, 519 F.2d 150 , 160 n.20 (3d Cir. 1975); but cf. Bishop v. Wood, supra, 426 U.S. at 353-362 , 96 S.Ct. 2074 (White, J. dissenting).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thurston v. Dekle
Arnett demands no more. 1 In the notice of proposed removal, the detachment commander also informed him of the following prerogatives: (1) if Davis chose to reply orally, he could be accompanied by a representative of his choice; (2) he could submit affidavits to support his answer; (3) if he did not understand the reasons for the proposed removal he could contact the detachment personnel officer for further explanation; (4) he would be allowed eight hours of official time to review the material and prepare an answer; (5) material relied on by the charging party would be available to Davis for…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Alcala
(Id., at pp. 247-248 [47 L.Ed.2d at pp. 715-716]; see also Quinn v. Muscare (1976) 425 U.S. 560 [ 48 L.Ed.2d 165 , 96 S.Ct. 1752 ] [firefighter’s hair regulation]; Gianatasio v. Whyte (2d Cir. 1970) 426 F.2d 908 , cert. den. (1970) 400 U.S. 941 [ 27 L.Ed.2d 244 , 91 S.Ct. 234 ] [National Guard].) We are not persuaded by petitioner’s assertion that his right to freedom of choice in personal appearance must be that of the citizenry at large.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eckmann v. Board of Education of Hawthorn School District No. 17
(2×)
See also Andrews v. Drew Municipal Separate School District, 507 F.2d 611 (5th Cir.1975)., cert. dismissed, 425 U.S. 559 , 96 S.Ct. 1725 , 48 L.Ed.2d 169 (1976) (school board rule denying employment to unwed parents violates equal protection; invasion of privacy issue left open). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saal v. Middendorf
Kelley v. Johnson, 425 U.S. 238, 247 , 96 S.Ct. 1440, 1446 , 47 L.Ed.2d 708 (1976); see also, Quinn v. Muscare, 425 U.S. 560 , 96 S.Ct. 1752 , 48 L.Ed.2d 165 , reh. denied, 426 U.S. 954 , 96 S.Ct. 3183 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1194 (1976). 7 *200 The provisions of the Navy regulations under which plaintiff was processed after disclosure of her homosexual activities state in relevant part: “1.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Phil Jacobs v. Ken Kunes and County of Maricopa
See also Quinn v. Muscare, 425 U.S. 560 , 96 S.Ct. 1752 , 48 L.Ed.2d 165 (1976) (fireman hair length regulation). 3 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DREW MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL.
v.
ANDREWS ET AL.
v.
ANDREWS ET AL.
74-1318.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 3, 1976.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 13 opinions | Published
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
William A. Allain and Champ T. Terney argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs was A. F. Summer, Attorney General of Mississippi.
Charles Victor McTeer and Rhonda Copelon argued the cause for respondents. With them on the briefs were Morton Stavis and Nancy Stearns.[*]
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
[*] Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by Peter B. Sandmann and Susanne Martinez for the Child Welfare League of America, and by Mary C. Dunlap, Wendy W. Williams, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Melvin L. Wulf for Equal Rights Advocates, Inc., et al.
Briefs of amici curiae were filed by Solicitor General Bork, Assistant Attorney General Pottinger, and Abner W. Sibal for the United States, and by Stephen J. Pollak, Martin J. Flynn, Richard M. Sharp, and David Rubin for the National Education Assn.