Cash v. Mathews, 425 U.S. 967 (1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Cash v. Mathews, 425 U.S. 967 (1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
87 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Subpoenas for Documents (ca8, 1994-11-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Subpoenas for Documents
8th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Beattie, 522 F.2d 267, 268 (2d Cir.1975), vacated, 425 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 2163 , 48 L.Ed.2d 791 , cert. denied, 425 U.S. 970 , 96 S.Ct. 2165 , 48 L.Ed.2d 793 , modified, 541 F.2d 329 (1976) (subpoena requiring the production of accountant’s workpapers used in the preparation of tax returns).
discussed Cited "see" United States of America and Mary Jane Sciascia, Revenue Agent v. Dr. Martin Fox
2d Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
It concluded that compliance with a document subpoena may require “incriminating testimony” in two situations: (1) if the existence and location of the subpoenaed papers are unknown to the government, then the taxpayer's compelled production of those documents “tacitly concedes the existence of the papers demanded and their possession or control by the taxpayer,” id. at 410 , 96 S.Ct. at 1581 ; see In re Katz, 623 F.2d 122, 126 (2d Cir. 1980); United States v. Praetorius, 622 F.2d 1054, 1062-63 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 860 , 101 S.Ct. 162 , 66 L.Ed.2d 76 (1980); In re Gran…
cited Cited "see" McCavitt v. Registrars of Voters of Brockton
Mass. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Boardman v. Esteva, 323 So. 2d 259, 269 (Fla. 1975), appeal dismissed, 425 U.S. 967 (1976); Lanser v. Koconis, 62 Wis. 2d 86, 92 (1974); Application of Moore, 57 N.J.Super. 244, 256 (1959).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Superior Court of Maricopa County
Ariz. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Beattie, 522 F.2d 267, 270 (2nd Cir. 1975), remanded 425 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 2163 , 48 L.Ed.2d 791 (1967), affirmed as modified, 541 F.2d 329 (1976), where he wrote that a “subpoena demanding that an accused produce his own records is * * the equivalent of requiring him to take the stand and admit their genuineness * * See also, Schmerber v. State of California, supra, 384 U.S. at 763-764 , 86 S.Ct. at 1832 . 4 .
cited Cited "see" In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Dr. Milton Shiffman
6th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Beattie, 522 F.2d 267 (2d Cir. 1975), vacated, 425 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 2163 , 48 L.Ed.2d 791 (1976), modified, 541 F.2d 329 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cash
v.
Mathews, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
No. 75-6079.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 1976.
425 U.S. 967
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Affirmed on appeal from D. C. N. D. Ga.