green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“If the jury can reasonably be expected to keep the evidence separate as to each count ... severance should be denied.”
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Ruben Pulido
if the jury can reasonably be expected to keep the evidence separate as to each count ... severance should be denied.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dyle
See United States v. Masterson, 529 F.2d 30 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 426 U.S. 908 , 96 S.Ct. 2231 , 48 L.Ed.2d 833 (1976) (applies an abuse of discretion standard to the alleged error of failing to give particularized instructions); Jones v. State, 450 So.2d 165 (Ala.Crim.App.1983) (holding that whether to give a Telfaire instruction was in the discretion of the trial court, and that the trial court had not abused *611 its discretion under the facts), affd 450 So.2d 171 (Ala.1984); State v. Cerilli, 222 Conn. 556 , 610 A.2d 1130 (1992) (holding identification instructions, although not constit…
discussed
Cited "see"
USA v. Chirichiello
Accord United States v. Cepulonis, 530 F.2d 238, 244 (1st Cir.) (co-conspirator with joint access to trunk could consent to search), cert, denied, 426 U.S. 908 (1976); United States v. Murphy, 506 F.2d 529, 530 (9th Cir. 1974) (defendant's employee with key could consent to search of warehouse leased by defendant), cert, denied, 420 U.S. 996 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Forrest Gustave v. United States
See, Arnold v. Wainwright, 516 F.2d 964, 970-71 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 908 , 96 S.Ct. 2230 , 48 L.Ed.2d 833 , cf. Smith v. United States, 456 F.2d 121 (3d Cir. 1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Indelicato, United States of America v. Richard F. Nutile
Fed.R.Evid. 404(b); see United States v. Rajewski, 526 F.2d 149, 159 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 908 , 96 S.Ct. 2231 , 48 L.Ed.2d 833 (1976); United States v. Fearns, 501 F.2d 486, 491-92 (7th Cir. 1974). 5.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernest James Collins
See United States v. Masterson, 529 F.2d 30, 32 (CA9 1976), cert. denied 426 U.S. 908 , 96 S.Ct. 2231 , 48 L.Ed.2d 833 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leonard Hassell, United States of America v. Kenneth McIntosh United States of America v. Robert McIntosh
See United States v. Williams, 529 F.2d 557, 559 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 908 , 96 S.Ct. 2232 , 48 L.Ed.2d 834 (1976); United States v. Kelley, 526 F.2d 615, 618 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 1471 , 47 L.Ed.2d 739 (1976); Brinlee v. United States, 496 F.2d 351, 354 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 878 , 95 S.Ct. 142 , 42 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Patterson
“Even if a defendant asserts self-representation, the right may be waived through defendant’s subsequent conduct indicating he is vacillating on the issue or has abandoned his request 7 Some courts have justified the lack of inquiry by asserting that the right to counsel “attaches automatically and must be waived affirmatively to be lost, while the [right to self-representation] does ‘not attach unless and until it [i]s asserted.’” Stano v. Dugger, 921 F.2d 1125, 1143 (11th Cir.1991) (en banc) (second alteration in original), quoting Dorman v. Wainwright, 798 F.2d 1358, 1366 (11th …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert E. Cook
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Rajewski, 526 F.2d 149, 160 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 908 , 96 S.Ct. 2231 , 48 L.Ed.2d 833 (1976); United States v. Booker, 480 F.2d 1310, 1311 (7th Cir.1973) (Stevens, J.) (stating that, although the refusal to give an informer instruction was not reversible error, in view of the informer’s relationship with the prosecution and “fundamental requirements of fairness,” the district court should have considered an instruction tailored to the circumstances of the case); cf. United States v. Yarbough, 55 F.3d 280, 283-84 (7th Cir.1995) (4-part test fo…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Daniel L. Balzano
This court has observed that ‘ “[t]he question of wheth *1282 er a joint trial infringes upon the defendant’s right to a fair trial depends on whether it is within the jury’s capacity, given the complexity of the case, to follow admonitory instructions and to keep separate, collate and appraise the evidence relevant only to each defendant.” ’ United States v. Cavale, 688 F.2d 1098, 1107 (7th Cir.) (quoting United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1200 (7th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981)), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1018 , 103 S.Ct. 380 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reese v. State
Id. at 611 ; see also United States v. Montgomery, 529 F.2d 1404, 1406 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 908 , 96 S.Ct. 2281 , 48 L.Ed.2d 833 (1976); United States v. Conder, 423 F.2d 904, 908 (6th Cir.1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Lee Spencer v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Center, Respondent
(2×)
See, e.g., Tennon v. State, 235 Ga. 594 , 220 S.E.2d 914 (1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 908 , 96 S.Ct. 2231 , 48 L.Ed.2d 833 (1976), Sanders v. State, 235 Ga. 425 , 219 S.E.2d 768 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976); Holsey v. State, 235 Ga. 270 , 219 S.E.2d 374 (1975); Young v. State, 232 Ga. 285 , 206 S.E.2d 439 (1974); Williams v. State, 232 Ga. 203 , 206 S.E.2d 37 (1974); Simmons v. State, 226 Ga. 110 , 172 S.E.2d 680 (1970); Miller v. State, 224 Ga. 627 , 163 S.E.2d 730 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sammy Don Blalock
See also United States v. Cepulonis, 530 F.2d 238, 244 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 426 U.S. 908 , 96 S.Ct. 2231 , 48 L.Ed.2d 834 (1976); United States v. Sellers, 520 F.2d 1281, 1284 (4th Cir. 1975), vacated on other grounds, 424 U.S. 961 , 96 S.Ct. 1453 , 47 L.Ed.2d 728 (1976); United States v. Blake, 484 F.2d 50, 57 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 949 , 94 S.Ct. 3076 , 41 L.Ed.2d 669 (1974); and United States v. Looney, 481 F.2d 31, 33 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1070 , 94 S.Ct. 581 , 38 L.Ed.2d 476 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Saul Kopel
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Rajewski, 526 F.2d 149 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 908 , 96 S.Ct. 2231 , 48 L.Ed.2d 833 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Huie E. Krana v. United States
We have repeatedly held that in cases such as this, “[t]he order of proof is within the discretion of the trial judge.” United States v. Kelley, 526 F.2d 615, 618 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 1471 , 47 L.Ed.2d 739 (1976); see also United States v. Williams, 529 F.2d 557, 559 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 908 , 96 S.Ct. 2232 , 48 L.Ed.2d 834 (1976).
Local 17, International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union
v.
Paramount Transport Systems
v.
Paramount Transport Systems
No. 75-1515.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1976.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.