green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ingram
See United States v. Guido, 704 F.2d 675, 676 (2d Cir.1983) ("Since the Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches only after the filing of formal charges, appellant's incriminating statement, if protected at all, is protected by the Fifth Amendment rather than the Sixth.”) See also United States v. Duvall, 537 F.2d 15, 20-22 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3173 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1188 (1976). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. DeJesus
See DiGiangiemo v. Oligiatti, 426 U.S. 950 (1976), where the court assumed without discussion that a ruling resulting from a motion to suppress is a ruling on an issue of ultimate fact.
discussed
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. McMaster v. Benson
See State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 111 , 235 N.W.2d 810, 814 (1975) (life sentence is “a 25-year minimum prison term, less time credited for good behavior”), ce rt. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3172 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1187 (1976); State v. Dehler, 257 Minn. 549, 561 , 102 N.W.2d 696, 705 (1960) (life sentence is a minimum term less time which “would be” allowed for good conduct).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Franklin
See United States v. Duvall, 537 F.2d 15, 22 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carter v. Three Unknown Police Officers of the Wilmington Police Department
In the initial criminal matter, the probable cause issue was decided in the denial of Carter’s motion to suppress evidence based on his allegation of an illegal arrest. “[T]hat the parties were fully heard, that the court supported its decision with a reasoned opinion, that the decision was subject to appeal or was in fact reviewed on appeal, are factors supporting the conclusion that the decision is final for the purposes of preclusion.” Restatement (Second) of Judgments, § 13, Comment g (1982); see, United States ex rel Di Giangiemo v. Regan, 528 F.2d 1262 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Territo
See United States v. Duvall, 537 F.2d 15, 21 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3173 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1188 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Key
Accord United States v. Duvall, 537 F.2d 15, 20-22 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Talley v. State
(2×)
See People v. Dunn, 31 Ill.App.3d 854 , 334 N.E.2d 866, 871-72 (1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3171 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1187 (1976), where the court held, in a remarkably similar factual situation, that “[t]he questions asked were of a general investigatory nature and could not be characterized as a process of investigation which lent itself to eliciting incriminating statements.” Officer Holder’s statement to Talley that the Opelika police wanted to question him and his companion about a theft was met with Talley’s response that they had not done anything.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kornblau
See United States v. Duvall, 537 F.2d 15, 20-22 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3173 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1188 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bright Horizon House, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Thus, it has been held that churches “occupy a different status from mere commercial enterprises and, when the church enters the picture, different considerations apply.” (Matter of Diocese of Rochester v Planning Bd., 1 NY2d 508, 523 , supra; see Jewish Reconstructionist Synagogue v Incorporated Vil. of Roslyn Harbor, 38 NY2d 283, 287-288 , cert den 426 US 950 ; Matter of Westchester Reform Temple v Brown, 22 NY2d 488, 493 .) Accordingly, the general policy, as applied in this State, is that religious institutions are virtually immune from zoning restrictions.
discussed
Cited "see"
New Education Development Systems, Inc. v. Boitano
(2×)
See Jewish Reconstruction Synagogue v. Village of Roslyn Harbor, 38 N.Y.2d 283 , 342 N.E.2d 534 , 379 N.Y.S.2d 747 (1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3171 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1187 (1976); see also Deerfield Medical Center v. City of Deerfield Beach, 661 F.2d 328, 336-38 (5th Cir.1981) (denial of preliminary injunction reversed where zoning decision interfered with constitutional right to abortion).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jordon v. New York Mercantile Exchange
(2×)
See Lagorio v. Board of Trade, 529 F.2d 1290 , 1292 (7th Cir.) (action taken in the good-faith exercise of an exchange’s regulatory duties cannot be characterized as market manipulations), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3171 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1187 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Augustine Guido
See United States v. Duvall, 537 F.2d 15, 20-22 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3173 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1188 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeffrey A. Barlow
United States v. Indian Boy X, 565 F.2d 585, 591 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 841 , 99 S.Ct. 131 , 58 L.Ed.2d 139 (1978); Pettyjohn v. United States, 419 F.2d 651, 656 (D.C.Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1058 , 90 S.Ct. 1383 , 25 L.Ed.2d 676 (1970); see United States v. Duvall, 537 F.2d 15 , 24 n. 9 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3173 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1188 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Franklin v. State
See State v. Walker, 235 N.W.2d 810 (Minn. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lilla
See United States v. Duvall, 537 F.2d 15, 22 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3173 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1188 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Covenant Community Church, Inc. v. Town of Gates Zoning Board of Appeals
Thus, “churches and schools occupy a different status from mere commercial enterprises and, when the church enters the picture, different considerations apply” (Matter of Diocese of Rochester v Planning Bd. of Town of Brighton, supra, p 523; accord Matter of Westchester Reform Temple v Brown, 22 NY2d 488, 493 , supra, and Jewish Reconstructionist Synagogue of North Shore v Incorporated Vil. of Roslyn Harbor, 38 NY2d 283, 287 , mot for rearg den 39 NY2d 743 , mot to amend remittitur den 39 NY2d 744 , cert den 426 US 950 ).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Manzanilla-De-Jesus
See United States v. Duvall, 537 F.2d 15 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3173 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1188 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Curtis Leon Lomax v. State of Alabama
See United States v. Duvall, 537 F.2d 15, 22 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3173 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1188 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Indelicato, United States of America v. Richard F. Nutile
See United States v. Duvall, 537 F.2d 15, 17-18 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3173 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1188 (1976); United States v. Brown, supra, 495 F.2d at 597 n. 4.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Underwood
See State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105 , 235 N.W.2d 810 (1975), certiorari denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3172 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1187 (1976); State v. Roberts, 296 Minn. 347 , 208 N.W.2d 744 (1973); State v. Beck, 289 Minn. 287 , 183 N.W.2d 781 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Groover
(2×)
See Lagorio v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago, 529 F.2d 1290 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3171 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1187 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alvaro Burgos and John Burgos
See United States v. Duvall, 537 F.2d 15, 24 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3173 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1188 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Swain
See, State v. Neumann, supra. Likewise, in State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105 , 235 N.W.2d 810 (1975), certiorari denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3172 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1187 (1976), the court’s conclusion that a prolonged severe beating supported inferences of premeditation and intent was bolstered by evidence of prior robbery planning and desire to prevent identification.
discussed
Cited "see"
Newell v. Federal Energy Administration
(2×)
See Lagorio v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago, 529 F.2d 1290 , 1291 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3171 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1187 (1976). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Terrance Anderson
And, in Moran , it expressly distinguished a failure of the authorities to notify a defendant being questioned that a lawyer had called the station house and tried to speak with him— grounds the Court deemed insufficient to violate Miranda — from “the kind of ‘trick[ery]’ that can vitiate the validity of a waiver.” Moran, 475 U.S. at 423 , 106 S.Ct. at 1142 (citing Miranda); see also United States v. Duvall, 537 F.2d 15 (2d Cir.) (Assistant United States Attorney's threat of unrealistic 100-year sentence was a major factor in the decision to suppress defendant’s confession), cert…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
First Covenant Church v. City of Seattle
(2×)
See also Jewish Reconstructionist Synagogue v. Roslyn Harbor, 38 N.Y.2d 283 , 342 N.E.2d 534 , 379 N.Y.S.2d 747 (1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 (1976) (requiring special use permit for synagogue in residential area).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Beryl N. Jones v. Caddo Parish School Board v. June Phillips, Movant-Appellant
(4×)
See, e.g., Lagorio v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago, 529 F.2d 1290, 1291 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3171 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1187 (1976); Davis v. Romney, 490 F.2d 1360, 1366 (3d Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
P. J. Taggares Co. v. New York Mercantile Exchange
(2×)
See, e. g., Lagorio v. Board of Trade, 529 F.2d 1290 , 1292 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3171 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1187 (1976); Smith v. Groover, 468 F.Supp. 105 (N.D.Ill.1979); Com panía de Salvadorena de Cafe, S. A. v. Commodities Futures Trading Comm’n, 446 F.Supp. 687, 691 (S.D.N.Y.1978). 18 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mabel Vickers v. James L. Trainor, Director, Illinois Department of Public Aid
(2×)
See also Lagorio v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago, 529 F.2d 1290, 1291 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3171 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1187 (1976). 2 . 45 C.F.R. § 228.34 (d), in pertinent part, states: “The final services plan must include an explanation of differences between the proposed and final services plan and the reasons therefor, including a summary of the public comments.” 3 .
Riley
v.
Stephens
v.
Stephens
No. 75-1617.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 21, 1976.
Published
Sup, Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.