green
Positive treatment
8.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Murray v. Hospital Corp. of America
But see Fridrich v. Bradford, 542 F.2d 307, 318-19 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 767 , 50 L.Ed.2d 769 (1977) (limiting Affiliated Ute to cases in which the duty to disclose is absolute — where plaintiff has dealt with defendant or been influenced in his or her investment decisions by acts of the defendant). 4 .
discussed
Cited "but see"
Stromfeld v. Great Atlantic & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.
But see Fridrich v. Bradford, 542 F.2d 307, 318-19 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 767 , 50 L.Ed.2d 769 (1977) (in open market transactions, duty to disclose runs only to persons with whom defendant has traded).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. West-Bey
"The passage of time is not an insurmountable obstacle if sufficient contemporaneous information is available.” Reynolds, 86 F.3d at 803 ; see Bruce v. Estelle, 536 F.2d 1051, 1057 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 767 , 50 L.Ed.2d 770 (1977) (determining nine-year gap between trial and competency hearing did not alone vitiate opportunity for meaningful hearing); Barefield v. New Mexico, 434 F.2d 307, 309 (10th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 959 , 91 S.Ct. 969 , 28 L.Ed.2d 244 (1971) (finding “mere lapse of time before a competency hearing” does not invalidate fin…
discussed
Cited "see"
DeSpain v. State
(2×)
See Thompson v. Oklahoma, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 768 , 50 L.Ed.2d 770 (1977); United States v. Catalda, 832 F.2d 869 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1022 , 108 S.Ct. 1577 , 99 L.Ed.2d 892 (1988); United States v. Kirk, 723 F.2d 1379 (8th Cir.1983); Herrera v. United States, 798 F.Supp. 295 (E.D.N.C.1992) (mentioning double jeopardy claims in conjunction with post-conviction re lief).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dorothy E. Dreyer and Naomi D. Strayer v. Arco Chemical Company, a Division of Atlantic Richfield Company
See Inventive Music Ltd. v. Cohen, 617 F.2d 29, 31 (3d Cir.1980) (quoting Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. v. Videfreeze Corp., 540 F.2d 1171, 1178 (3d Cir.1976) (directed verdict), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 767 , 50 L.Ed.2d 770 (1977)).
cited
Cited "see"
Donald I. LAVENTHALL, Appellant, v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, Appellee
See Fridrich v. Bradford, 542 F.2d 307, 326 (6th Cir.1976) (Celebrezze, J., concurring), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 767 , 50 L.Ed.2d 769 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brooks v. Oklahoma
(2×)
See Thompson v. Oklahoma, 429 U. S. 1053 (1977) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Cousins v. Maryland, 429 U. S. 1027 (Brennan, J., dissenting); Dempsey v. United States, 423 U. S. 1079 (1976) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Susi v. Flowers, 423 U. S. 1006 (1975) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Vardas v. Texas, 423 U. S. 904 (1975) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Stewart v. Iowa, 423 U. S. 902 (1975) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Waugh v. Gray, 422 U. S. 1027 (1975) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Wells v. Missouri, 419 U. S. 1075 (1974) (Brennan, J., dissenting); Moton v. Swenson, 417 U. S. 957 (1974) (Brennan, J., dissen…
discussed
Cited "see"
Spradling v. Texas; And Dunn v. Texas
(2×)
See Thompson v. Oklahoma, 429 U. S. 1053 (1977) (Brennan, J., dissenting), and cases collected therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ronald K. Spivey v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
(2×)
See Bruce v. Estelle, 483 F.2d 1031, 1040 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 767 , 50 L.Ed.2d 770 (1977), overruled in part on other grounds, Zapata v. Estelle, 585 F.2d 750, 752 (5th Cir. 1978). .
cited
Cited "see"
Truitt v. Ohio
See Thompson v. Oklahoma, 429 U. S. 1053 (1977) (Brennan, J., dissenting), and cases collected therein.
cited
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Comtech Telecommunications Corp.
See Fridrich v. Bradford, 542 F.2d 307, 326 (6th Cir. 1976) (Celebrezze, J., concurring), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 767 , 50 L.Ed.2d 769 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Comtech Telecommunications Corp.
See Fridrich v. Bradford, 542 F.2d 307, 326 (6th Cir. 1976) (Celebrezze, J., concurring), cer t. denied, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 767 , 50 L.Ed.2d 769 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Oklahoma
(2×)
See Thompson v. Oklahoma , 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 768 , 50 L.Ed.2d 770 (1977) (BRENNAN, J., dissenting), and cases collected therein. * * Respondent argues that petitioner waived his double jeopardy claim in the proceedings below.
cited
Cited "see"
Rivera v. United States
See Thompson v. Oklahoma, 429 U. S. 1053 (1977) (Brennan, J., dissenting), and cases collected therein.
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Vernon Bruce v. United States of America, the General Services Administration and Ralph W. McCann
See Bruce v. Estelle, 536 F.2d 1051, 1053 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 767 , 50 L.Ed.2d 770 (1977); Bruce v. Estelle, 483 F.2d 1031, 1036 (5th Cir. 1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Cecil v. United States
See Thompson v. Oklahoma, 429 U. S. 1053 (1977) (Brennan, J., dissenting), and cases collected therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. Oklahoma
(2×)
See Thompson v. Oklahoma, 429 U. S. 1053 (1977) (Brennan, J., dissenting), and cases collected therein.
cited
Cited "see"
Clift v. Alabama
See Thompson v. Oklahoma, 429 U. S. 1053 (1977) (Brennan, J., dissenting), and cases collected therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frumento
See Thompson v. Oklahoma, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 768 , 50 L.Ed.2d 770 (1977), in which, dissenting from a denial of certiorari, he wrote: I would grant the petition for certiorari and reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals affirming the burglary and firearm convictions.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frumento
See Thompson v. Oklahoma, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 768 , 50 L.Ed.2d 770 (1977), in which, dissenting from a denial of certiorari, he wrote: I would grant the petition for certiorari and reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals affirming the burglary and firearm convictions.
cited
Cited "see"
Archangel Angelo v. Bacharach Instrument Company, a Division of American Bosch Arma Corporation, a New York Corporation
See Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. v. Videfreeze Corp., 540 F.2d 1171, 1178 (3d Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 767 , 50 L.Ed.2d 770 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Forrest Thomas, III a/k/a Forrest Thomas v. State of Mississippi
See, e.g., Wheat, 793 F.2d at 630 (“The test for the district court in determining the question of meaningfulness is whether ‘the quantity and quality of available evidence was adequate to arrive at an assessment that could be labeled as more than mere speculation.’”) (quoting Bruce v. Estelle, 536 F.2d 1051, 1057 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 767 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 770 (1977)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Terry Pitchford v. State of Mississippi
See, e.g. , Wheat , 793 F.2d at 630 ("The test for the district court in determining the question of meaningfulness is whether 'the quantity and quality of available evidence was adequate to arrive at an assessment that could be labeled as more than mere speculation.' ") (quoting Bruce v. Estelle , 536 F.2d 1051 , 1057 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied , 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 767 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 770 (1977) ). " '[C]ontemporaneous expert medical evidence often provides the most useful evidence' of whether a meaningful retrospective hearing may be held." James , 86 So.3d at 293 (quoting Wheat , 793…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lane
Compare Bruce v. Estelle, 483 F.2d 1031, 1037 (5th Cir.1973) (if habeas petitioner can present sufficient objective evidence of incompetency so as to be otherwise entitled to a hearing on his competency, the issue will not be considered waived), certiorari denied, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 767 , 50 L.Ed.2d 770 2 Defense counsel advised Judge Strayhorn that when on stelazine, Lewis is "alert, bright, healthy." (R. 448)
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States ex rel. Lewis v. Lane
Compare Bruce v. Estelle, 483 F.2d 1031, 1037 (5th Cir.1973) (if habeas petitioner can present sufficient objective evidence of incompetency so as to be otherwise entitled to a hearing on his competency, the issue will not be considered waived), certiorari denied, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 767 , 50 L.Ed.2d 770 . .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Polak v. Continental Hosts, Ltd.
Wilson v. Comtech Telecommunications Corp., 648 F.2d 88, 94-95 (2d Cir.1981); see also Fridrich v. Bradford, 542 F.2d 307, 326 (6th Cir.1976) (Celebrezze,' J., concurring), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 767 , 50 L.Ed.2d 769 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Borchardt v. United States
(2×)
See also Thompson v. Oklahoma, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 768 , 50 L.Ed.2d 770 (1977) (BRENNAN, J., dissenting), and cases collected therein. 8 In the instant case, the Federal Government in the Southern District marshaled an array of evidence to demonstrate that Borchardt had twice smuggled currency out of the country, and it used these episodes along with evidence of other conspiratorial acts to obtain Borchardt's conviction for conspiring to violate, inter alia, 21 U.S.C. § 952 (a) (importation of controlled substances).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Margaret M. Blair v. The Manhattan Life Insurance Company
(2×)
See also Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. v. Videfreeze Corp., 540 F.2d 1171, 1174-75 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 767 , 50 L.Ed.2d 770 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Franzen
"The passage of even a considerable amount of time may not be an insurmountable obstacle if there is sufficient evidence in the record derived from knowledge contemporaneous to trial." United States v. Makris, 535 F.2d 899, 904 (5th Cir. 1976), certiorari denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (two and one-half year delay from trial to retrospective competency hearing), citing Conner v. Wingo, 429 F.2d 630 (6th Cir. 1970), certiorari denied, 406 U.S. 921 , 92 S.Ct. 1779 , 32 L.Ed.2d 121 (seven-year delay from trial to competency hearing); see also Bruce v. Estelle, 536 F.2d 1051…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States ex rel. Bilyew v. Franzen
“The passage of even a considerable amount of time may not be an insurmountable obstacle if there is sufficient evidence in the record derived from knowledge contemporaneous to trial.” United States v. Makris, 535 F.2d 899, 904 (5th Cir. 1976), certiorari denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (two and one-half year delay from trial to retrospective competency hearing), citing Conner v. Wingo, 429 F.2d 630 (6th Cir. 1970), certiorari denied, 406 U.S. 921 , 92 S.Ct. 1779 , 32 L.Ed.2d 121 (seven-year delay from trial to competency hearing); see also Bruce v. Estelle, 536 F.2d …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilbur P. Bolius v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation, State of Florida
See also Bruce v. Estelle, 5 Cir. 1976, 536 F.2d 1051, 1057-58 , cert. denied, 1977, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 767 , 50 L.Ed.2d 770 (Bruce II).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Estelle, Corrections Director
v.
Bruce
v.
Bruce
No. 76-684.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 1977.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.