green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.1 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Sibley
defendant in a criminal trial as yet has no right to an in-court lineup
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Brown
there were sufficient officers in the area that . . . they might have maintained surveillance while a warrant was sought
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Larry Gregory Johnson
Id. at 1098. 13 The parties agree that Johnson's phone was called from the MCC phone 147 times from February 1989 until October 1989.
cited
Cited "see"
Terrance Drake v. Superintendent, Trumbull Correctional Institution
See United States v. Calhoun, 542 F.2d 1094, 1103-4 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1064 (1977) (inability to produce officers' surveillance notes was harmless error).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian Edward BUTLER, Defendant-Appellant
See United States v. Calhoun, 542 F.2d 1094, 1100 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1064 , 97 S.Ct. 792 , 50 L.Ed.2d 781 (1977) (the *921 fact that the arresting officer does not have personal knowledge of the facts underlying the determination that probable cause exists does not invalidate the arrest).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alan Nohara
See United States v. Calhoun, 542 F.2d 1094, 1100 (9th Cir.1976) (dictum) (“The hallway of an apartment building, as with the threshold of one’s dwelling, is a ‘public’ place for purposes of interpreting the Fourth Amendment.”), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1064 , 97 S.Ct. 792 , 50 L.Ed.2d 781 (1977). *1242 Nohara relies on United States v. Fluker, 543 F.2d 709, 716 (9th Cir.1976), in which we held that the appellant had a reasonable expectation of- privacy in the corridor area separating the door of his apartment from the outer doorway of the apartment building.
discussed
Cited "see"
Thaddeus Donald Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company, Inc.
See United States v. Calhoun, 542 F.2d 1094, 1103 (9th Cir.1976) (citing United States v. Bailey, 468 F.2d 652, 658 , aff'd on other grounds, 480 F.2d 518 (5th Cir.1973) (en banc)), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1064 , 97 S.Ct. 792 , 50 L.Ed.2d 781 (1977). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Sumner v. Mata
(2×)
The Court of Appeals has held that the necessity for the use of a photographic display is an important factor in judging the validity of pretrial identification procedures, though lack of necessity is not a per se ground for rejecting the identification. 611 F. 2d, at 757; see United States v. Calhoun, 542 F. 2d 1094, 1104 (CA9 1976), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1064 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry R. Blake
See United States v. Calhoun, 542 F.2d 1094, 1102 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1064 , 97 S.Ct. 792 , 50 L.Ed.2d 781 (1977); United States v. Phillips, 497 F.2d 1131, 1135 (9th Cir. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jim
See also United States v. Calhoun, 542 F.2d 1094 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1064 , 97 S.Ct. 792 , 50 L.Ed.2d 781 (1977); 47 Am.Jur.2d Jury § 222 at 813 (1969) (“Discharging or excusing a qualified juror is not generally regarded as prejudicial or reversible error.” (footnote omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vanskike v. ACF Industries, Inc.
See also United States v. Calhoun, 542 F.2d 1094, 1103 (9th Cir. 1976) (not reversible error to excuse juror without sufficient cause if jury was impartial), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1064 , 97 S.Ct. 792 , 50 L.Ed.2d 781 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Warren Vanskike and Lucille Vanskike, His Wife v. Acf Industries, Incorporated F/k/a the American Car and Foundry Company, a Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, and St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad Company, a Corporation. Warren Vanskike and Lucille Vanskike, His Wife v. Acf Industries, Incorporated F/k/a the American Car and Foundry Company, a Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad Company, a Corporation. Warren Vanskike and Lucille Vanskike, His Wife v. Acf Industries, Incorporated F/k/a the American Car and Foundry Company, a Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad Company, a Corporation, Warren Vanskike, Lucille Vanskike v. Acf Industries, Incorporated F/k/a the American Car and Foundry Company, a Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, and St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad Company, a Corporation. Warren Vanskike, Lucille Vanskike v. Acf Industries, Incorporated F/k/a the American Car and Foundry Company, a Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, and St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad Company, a Corporation
See also United States v. Calhoun, 542 F.2d 1094, 1103 (9th Cir. 1976) (not reversible error to excuse juror without sufficient cause if jury was impartial), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1064 , 97 S.Ct. 792 , 50 L.Ed.2d 781 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cochrell
v.
Wyrick, Warden
v.
Wyrick, Warden
No. 76-5704.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 1977.
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.