green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward B. Betts, Randy J. Lane, and Judy K. Lane
(4×)
See United States v. Magnano, 543 F.2d 431, 435 (2d Cir.1976) (prior narcotics dealings admissible “for the legitimate purpose of showing the background and development of the conspiracy”), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1100, 1101 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977); United States v. Conley, 523 F.2d 650, 654 (8th Cir.1975) (per curiam) (prior narcotics activity “was admissible to show the defendant’s knowing and intentional development of a scheme to sell heroin and of a plan to do so consistent with the actual mode of distribution”), ce rt. denied, 424 U.S. 920 , 96 S.Ct. 1125 , 47 L…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ed J. Hagen, Also Known as J. Ewald Martha Jo \Marjo\" Hagen and William C. Hagen
See United States v. Matya, 541 F.2d 741, 748 (8th Cir.1976) (Section 1955 “makes no distinction whatsoever between state felonies and state misdemeanors.”), cer t. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1101 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977); see also United States v. Smaldone, 485 F.2d 1333, 1344, 1351 (10th Cir.1973) (upholding Section 1955 conviction where state gambling laws violated were labeled misdemeanors), cer t. dismissed, 416 U.S. 917 , 94 S.Ct. 1625 , 40 L.Ed.2d 119 , and cert. denied, 416 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1934 , 40 L.Ed.2d 286 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Luz Medina, Silverio Polanco, Franklin Marmolejo, Juan A. Mata, Franklin Marmolejo, Silverio Polanco and Juan A. Mata
See United States v. Magnano, 543 F.2d 431, 434-35 (2d Cir.1976) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1101 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977); see also United States v. Zabare, 871 F.2d 282, 286-87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 856 , 110 S.Ct. 161 , 107 L.Ed.2d 119 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Herbert Bryant, Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Herbert Bryant, Inc., 177 U.S.App.D.C. 152 , 543 F.2d 299 (1976), cert. den., 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1100 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry C. Davis and John Newsome
See United States v. Magnano, 543 F.2d 431, 437 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1101 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977); United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1105 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Jerome Sumpter
See United States v. Hodge, 539 F.2d 898, 906 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 (1977); United States v. Ambrose, 483 F.2d 742, 746 (6th Cir. 1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harvey
In addition, § 2518(4)(c) requires that the order authorizing the interception set forth specifically: (c) a particular description of the type of communication sought to be intercepted, and a statement of the particular offense to which it relates... . 3 *1064 The foregoing provisions were intended to incorporate into the Act the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of particularity in authorization for a search, and to prohibit what Justice Clark referred to in Brodson as the “electronic equivalent ... of a ‘general search warrant.’ ” Brodson, supra, 528 F.2d at 215 ; see U.S. v. Matya,…
discussed
Cited "see"
Dudley v. Dalsheim
(2×)
See U. S. v. Magnano, 543 F.2d 431 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1100 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977). *92 It appears from a reading of the trial court’s charge that this statement did not in any way diminish the state’s burden of proof: You must bear in mind that the word reasonable is to be considered and weighed by you as much as the word doubt; in otherwords, the law does not say that a person be acquitted on any kind of a doubt.
discussed
Cited "see"
Church of Scientology, Etc. v. Dept. of State
See Allard v. Church of Scientology, 129 Cal.Rptr. 797 (Cal.App.1976), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1101 , 51 L.Ed.2d 537 (1977); United States v. Hubbard, 474 F.Supp. 64, 70-71 (D.D.C.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clements
See United States v. Matya, 541 F.2d 741, 746-747 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1101 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977), which upheld the grant of a wiretap where no statute was cited in the application. 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clements
See United States v. Matya, 541 F.2d 741, 746-747 (8th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1101 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977), which upheld the grant of a wiretap where no statute was cited in the application. 15 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard J. Rotchford, United States of America v. Joseph Edward Powers, United States of America v. Ernest Carranza, Jr., United States of America v. Glenn Alan Rinks, United States of America v. David Grant Fennessey, United States of America v. Leo Dominick Riti
See Judge Van Oosterhout's discussion of the problem in United States v. Matya, 541 F.2d 741, 744-46 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1101 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977). 44 David Grant Fennessey complains individually that as to him there was no compliance with the "naming requirement" appearing in 18 U.S.C. §§ 2518 (1)(b) (iv) and 2518(4)(a).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rotchford
See Judge Van Oosterhout’s discussion of the problem in United States v. Matya, 541 F.2d 741, 744-46 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1101 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Albert Perez v. Frank Irwin, Superintendent, Wende Correctional Facility
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Magnano, 543 F.2d 431, 436 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1100, 1101 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977); United States v. Acarino, 408 F.2d 512, 517 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 961 , 89 S.Ct. 2101 , 23 L.Ed.2d 746 (1969); United States v. Drake, 673 F.2d 15, 21 (1st Cir.1982); United States v. Indorato, 628 F.2d 711, 720-21 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1016 , 101 S.Ct. 578 , 66 L.Ed.2d 476 (1980); United States v. Ariza-Ibarra, 605 F.2d 1216, 1228 (1st Cir.1979), appeal after remand, 651 F.2d 2 and cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ralph Hubert Barger
(2×)
United States v. Pennell, 737 F.2d 521, 534 (6th Cir.1984) (citations omitted) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1158 , 105 S.Ct. 906 , 83 L.Ed.2d 921 (1985); see also United States v. Hodge, 539 F.2d 898, 906 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1100 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ralph Hubert Barger
If either of these elements is missing, then the predisposition question is for the jury to decide. 42 United States v. Pennell, 737 F.2d 521, 534 (6th Cir.1984) (citations omitted) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1158 (1985); see also United States v. Hodge, 539 F.2d 898, 906 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Martin F. Hogan
See United States v. Bowie, 515 F.2d 3, 9 (7th Cir. 1975); United States v. Higgans, 507 F.2d 808, 813 (7th Cir.1974); see also United States v. Magnano, 543 F.2d 431, 437 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1101 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977); United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1105 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); cf. United States v. Davis, 838 F.2d 909, 921 (7th Cir.1988) (court holds harmless error to admit large quantities of cash to show defendants were involved in large-scale drug conspiracy).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Isaac Zabare, A/K/A \The Rabbi\""
(2×)
See also United States v. Magnano, 543 F.2d 431, 434 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1100, 1101 , 51 L.Ed. 2d 536 (1977); DeNoia, 451 F.2d at 981 ; Agueci, 310 F.2d at 835-36 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frank Viserto, Jr., Richard Rocco, Joseph Solce, Garnet Johnson, Sarah Payne, Howard Williams and Prentiss Covington
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Magnano, 543 F.2d 431, 435 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1100 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977); United States v. Torres, 519 F.2d 723, 727 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1019 , 96 S.Ct. 457 , 46 L.Ed.2d 392 (1975); United States v. Conley, 523 F.2d 650, 652-54 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 920 , 96 S.Ct. 1125 , 47 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Watkins
Compare United States v. Magnano, 543 F.2d 431, 436 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 (1977). 7 We assume, without deciding, that Nelson may be viewed as an accomplice to both murder and kidnapping in this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robertson
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-480.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1977.
Cited by 73 opinions | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.