Parker Seal Co. v. Cummins, 429 U.S. 65 (1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Parker Seal Co. v. Cummins, 429 U.S. 65 (1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
59 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nottelson v. Smith Steel Workers (ca7, 1981-04-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nottelson v. Smith Steel Workers (2×)
7th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Cummins v. Parker Seal Company, 516 F.2d 544, 551-554 (6th Cir. 1975), affirmed by an equally divided court, 429 U.S. 65 , 97 S.Ct. 342 , 50 L.Ed.2d 223 , vacated and remanded on another ground, 433 U.S. 903 . 13 Accordingly, the district court correctly adopted the holding in Tooley v. Martin-Marietta Corp., 476 F.Supp. 1027, 1030 (D.Ore.1979), that Section 701(j) "promotes the free exercise of religion without violating the Establishment Clause." 34 V.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nottelson v. Smith Steel Workers D.A.L.U. 19806 (2×)
7th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Cummins v. Parker Seal Company, 516 F.2d 544, 551-554 (6th Cir. 1975), affirmed by an equally divided court, 429 U.S. 65 , 97 S.Ct. 342 , 50 L.Ed.2d 223 , vacated and remanded on another ground, 433 U.S. 903 . 13 Accordingly, the district court correctly adopted the holding in Tooley v. Martin-Marietta Corp., 476 F.Supp. 1027, 1030 (D.Ore.1979), that Section 701(j) “promotes the free exercise of religion without violating the Establishment Clause.” V.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Department of Civil Rights Ex Rel. Parks v. General Motors Corp.
Mich. Ct. App. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g, Riley v Bendix Corp, 464 F2d 1113 (CA 5, 1972), Reid v Memphis Publishing Co, 468 F2d 346 (CA 6, 1972), Yott v North American Rockwell Corp, 501 F2d 398 (CA 9, 1974), Cummins v Parker Seal Co, 516 F2d 544 (CA 6, 1975), aff'd by equally divided court, 429 US 65 ; 97 S Ct 342 ; 50 L Ed 2d 223 (1976) and see generally Anno: Validity, Construction, and Application of Provisions of Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964 *378 (42 USCS §§ 2000e et seq.) and Implementing Regulations, Making Religious Discrimination in Employment Unlawful, 22 ALR Fed 580, § 40b), 15 Am Jur 2d, Civil Rights, …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PARKER SEAL CO.
v.
CUMMINS.
75-478.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 2, 1976.
429 U.S. 65
Per Curiam.
Cited by 26 opinions  |  Published
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.

Leonard H. Becker argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Paul S. Ryerson.

Thomas L. Hogan argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was James C. Hickey.

Deputy Solicitor General Wallace argued the cause for the United States et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Bork, Assistant Attorney General Pottinger, Mark L. Evans, Brian K. Landsberg, Dennis J. Dimsey, Abner W. Sibal, Joseph T. Eddins, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Gerald D. Letwin.[*]

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.[†]

MR. JUSTICE STEVENS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[*] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed by John O'B. Clarke, Jr., William G. Mahoney, and Plato E. Papps for the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, and by Dick H. Woods and George E. Feldmiller for Trans World Airlines, Inc.

Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by Warren L. Johns, Philip B. Kurland, and Alan L. Unikel for the Seventh-Day Adventist Church; by James W. Respess for the Americans United for Separation of Church and State; by Nathan Lewin, Dennis Rapps, and Howard I. Rhine for the National Jewish Commission on Law and Public Affairs; and by Leo Pfeffer for the Synagogue Council of America et al.

[†] [REPORTER'S NOTE: On rehearing this judgment and the judgment of the Court of Appeals were vacated, and the case was remanded for further consideration. 433 U. S. 903 (1977).]