United States v. Antelope, 429 U.S. 892 (1976). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Antelope, 429 U.S. 892 (1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Joyce Haas, Etc. v. Sirrouko Howard, Appeal of Oxbow Associates, Joyce Haas v. Patricia R. Harris, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (ca1, 1978-06-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Joyce Haas, Etc. v. Sirrouko Howard, Appeal of Oxbow Associates, Joyce Haas v. Patricia R. Harris, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
1st Cir. · 1978 · confidence medium
The Underwood order was issued June 6, 1976, and a stay of judgment was issued by the Supreme Court on October 18, 1976, which provided: “Application for stay of judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, entered June 8, 1976, presented to THE CHIEF *657 JUSTICE, and by him referred to the Court, granted pending further order of the Court.” Underwood v. Hills, supra, 429 U.S. at 892, 97 S.Ct. at 250.
cited Cited "see" Underwood v. Pierce
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Underwood v. Hills, 414 F.Supp. 526, 532 (D.D.C.1976), aff'd, Hills v. Underwood, 429 U.S. 892 , 97 S.Ct. 250 , 50 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976).
cited Cited "see" Underwood v. Pierce
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Underwood v. Hills, 414 F.Supp. 526, 532 (D.D.C.1976), aff'd, Hills v. Underwood, 429 U.S. 892 , 97 S.Ct. 250 , 50 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976). 6 The Supreme Court granted a stay of mandate.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Antelope
No. 75-661.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 18, 1976.
429 U.S. 892
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 424 U. S. 907.] Motions of respondents for' leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis granted. Motions for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that John W. Walker, Esquire, of Moscow, Idaho, serve as counsel for respondents Leonard Francis Davison and William Andrew Davison, and that[*893] Allen. V. Bowles, Esquire, of Moscow, Idaho, serve as counsel for respondent Antelope in this case.