green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.
(2×)
“There is nothing in the United States Constitution which limits the State’s power to require that medical procedures be done safely . . . .” Sendak v. Arnold, 429 U. S. 968, 969 (1976) (White, J., dissenting).
discussed
Cited "see"
Baskin v. Bogan
See Arnold v. Sendak, 416 F.Supp. 22, 23 (S.D.Ind.1976), aff'd, 429 U.S. 968 , 97 S.Ct. 476 , 50 L.Ed.2d 579 (1976) (finding “[t]he -Attorney General thus has broad powers- in the enforcement of criminal laws of the state, and is accordingly a proper defendant.”); see also Gary-Northwest Indiana Women’s Services, Inc. v. Bowen, 496 F.Supp. 894 (N.D.Ind.1980) (attorney general as a party to a law challenging statute criminalizing abortion).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ragsdale v. Turnock
See Arnold v. Sendak, 416 F.Supp. 22 (S.D.Ind.1976) (finding unconstitutional an Indiana statute requiring all abortions to be performed in hospitals or licensed health care facilities), aff'd mem., 429 U.S. 968 , 97 S.Ct. 476 , 50 L.Ed.2d 579 (1976); Village of Oak Lawn v. Marcowitz, 86 Ill.2d 406 , 55 Ill.Dec. 916 , 427 N.E.2d 36 (1981) (finding the portion of the definition of an ASTC including "any facility in which a medical or surgical procedure is utilized to terminate a pregnancy, irrespective of whether the facility is devoted primarily to this purpose" to be unconstitutional).
discussed
Cited "see"
Florida Women's Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Smith
See Sendak v. Arnold, 429 U.S. 968 , 97 S.Ct. 476 , 50 L.Ed.2d 579 (1976); Friendship Medical Center, Ltd. v. Chicago Board of Health, 505 F.2d 1141 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 997 , 95 S.Ct. 1438 , 43 L.Ed.2d 680 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Birth Control Centers, Inc. v. Reizen
See Arnold v. Sendak, 429 U.S. 968 , 97 S.Ct. 476 , 50 L.Ed.2d 579 (1976), in which the Court summarily affirmed invalidation of an Indiana statute requiring that all first-trimester abortions be performed in a hospital or licensed health facility; Mahoning Women’s Center v. Hunter, 610 F.2d 456 (6th Cir. 1979); Friendship Medical Center, Ltd. v. Chicago Board of Health, 505 F.2d 1141 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied sub nom Chicago Bd. of Health v. Friendship Medical Center, 420 U.S. 997 , 95 S.Ct. 1438 , 43 L.Ed.2d 680 (1975); Word v. Poelker, 495 F.2d 1349 (8th Cir. 1974); and Florida Women�…
cited
Cited "see"
Westchester Women's Health Organization, Inc. v. Whalen
See Sendak v. Arnold, 429 U.S. 968, 970 , 972 n„ 97 S.Ct. 476, 477 , 50 L.Ed.2d 579 (1976) (White, J„ dissenting). 8 .
cited
Cited "see"
William Baird v. Department of Public Health of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
See Sendak v. Arnold, 429 U.S. 968, 969, 971 , 97 S.Ct. 476 , 50 L.Ed.2d 579 (1976) (White, J., dissenting).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Women's Medical Center of Providence, Inc. v. Cannon
See also Sendak v. Arnold, 429 U.S. 968 , 97 S.Ct. 476 , 50 L.Ed.2d 579 (1976) (White, J., dissenting).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Interstate Commerce Commission
v.
Central of Georgia Railroad Co.
v.
Central of Georgia Railroad Co.
No. 76-373.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 29, 1976.
429 U.S. 968
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. D. C.
Me. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.