Huffman v. Estelle, 430 U.S. 919 (1977). · Go Syfert
Search
Huffman v. Estelle, 430 U.S. 919 (1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Settle (moctapp, 1984-02-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Settle
Mo. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hassell, 547 F.2d 1048, 1054 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 1338 , 51 L.Ed.2d 599 ; and compare Williams v. State, 558 S.W.2d 671 , 674—675[6] (Mo.App.1977), where it was said that defendant did not point to any evidence to show that any change, addition or deletion had been made in the tape.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Boffa
D. Del. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hassell, 547 F.2d 1048, 1052 (C.A.8), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 1338 , 51 L.Ed.2d 599 (1977).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Manuel Juan Alvarez
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hassell, 547 F.2d 1048, 1053 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 1338 , 51 L.Ed.2d 599 (1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Weatherly
Iowa Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
United States v. Biggins, 551 F.2d 64, 66-67 (5th Cir.1977) cited in Russell, 261 N.W.2d at 495-96 ; see also United States v. Hassell, 547 F.2d 1048, 1054-55 (8th Cir.1977) cert. denied by McIntosh v. United States, 430 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 1338 , 51 L.Ed.2d 599 (1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Lopez-Lima
S.D. Fla. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
United States v. Anderson, 872 F.2d 1508, 1516 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 566 , 107 L.Ed.2d 560 (1989); United States v. Juan, 776 F.2d 256, 258 (11th Cir.1985); see also United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1236 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987). 9 In Juan , the Eleventh Circuit ruled that the defendant could show his prior relationship with the government in order to show the basis of his allegedly innocent intent.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Patrick Defillipo and James Defillipo (2×)
2d Cir. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Stanchich, 550 F.2d 1294 , 1297-98 & n.1 (2d Cir. 1977); United States v. D’Amato, 493 F.2d 359, 363-64 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 826 , 95 S.Ct. 43 , 42 L.Ed.2d 50 (1974); see also United States v. Hassell, 547 F.2d 1048, 1052-53 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 1338 , 51 L.Ed.2d 599 (1977) (declarant’s statements to undercover agent that defendant had previously purchased heroin for others and that his money would be returned are admissible as verbal acts). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Huffman
v.
Estelle, Corrections Director
No. 76-6050.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 1977.
430 U.S. 919
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.