green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alex
See United States v. Zarattini, 552 F.2d 753, 757-58 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 942 , 97 S.Ct. 2661 , 53 L.Ed.2d 262 (1977); United States v. McMillen, 489 F.2d 229, 231 (7th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 955 , 93 S.Ct. 1420 , 35 L.Ed.2d 687 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Salerno
See United States v. Zarattini, 552 F.2d 753, 759 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 942 , 97 S.Ct. 2661 , 53 L.Ed.2d 262 (1977); United States v. Bronk, 604 F.Supp. 743, 746 (W.D.Wis.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. DeGeratto
See United States v. Zarattini, 552 F.2d 753, 759-60 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 942 , 97 S.Ct. 2661 , 53 L.Ed.2d 262 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Norman Hoffman
See United States v. Zarattini, 552 F.2d 753, 757 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 942 , 97 S.Ct. 2661 , 53 L.Ed.2d 262 (1977) (no right to discovery because person hearing statement was not a government agent).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Jan. 2, 1985
Thus, this is not a situation in which the government is using grand jury process for the purpose of harassment, In re Grand Jury Matters, 751 F.2d 13, 19 (1st Cir.1984); nor is the government attempting to freeze Simels' testimony for trial, see, e.g., United States v. Gibbons, 607 F.2d 1320, 1328 (10th Cir. 1979); United States v. Fisher, 455 F.2d 1101, 1104-05 (2d Cir.1972). "[W]here there is another legitimate purpose behind the grand jury investigation, the proceeding would not be improper merely because the Government may derive an incidental benefit." United States v. Gibbons, supra, 60…
discussed
Cited "see"
Payden v. United States
Thus, this is not a situation in which the government is using grand jury process for the purpose of harassment, In re Grand Jury Matters, 751 F.2d 13, 19 (1st Cir.1984); nor is the government attempting to freeze Siméis’ testimony for trial, see, e.g., United States v. Gibbons, 607 F.2d 1320, 1328 (10th Cir.1979); United States v. Fisher, 455 F.2d 1101, 1104-05 (2d Cir.1972). “[W]here there is another legitimate purpose behind the grand jury investigation, the proceeding would not be improper merely because the Government may derive an incidental benefit.” United States v. Gibbons, sup…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter Howard Wells
See United States v. Turner, 551 F.2d 780, 783 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 942 , 97 S.Ct. 2660 , 53 L.Ed.2d 262 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James H. Dennis, Sr., Michael K. Terebecki
See United States v. Johnston, 547 F.2d 282 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 942 , 97 S.Ct. 2660 , 53 L.Ed.2d 261 (1977) (common object to secure money from bank).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lenin Juarez and Oscar Juarez
See United States v. Johnston, 5 Cir., 547 F.2d 282, 284 , cert. denied, 431 U.S. 942 , 97 S.Ct. 2660 , 53 L.Ed.2d 261 (1977) (joinder under Rule 8 is permissible when defendants are properly charged with a single conspiracy).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rede Thomas Bad Cob
See United States v. Turner, 551 F.2d 780, 782 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 942 , 97 S.Ct. 2660 , 53 L.Ed.2d 262 (1977); United States v. Crow Dog, 537 F.2d 308, 309 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 929 , 97 S.Ct. 1547 , 51 L.Ed.2d 772 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McLendon v. Continental Group, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Johnston, 547 F.2d 282, 284 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 942 , 97 S.Ct. 2660 , 53 L.Ed.2d 261 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rory Tyree McElroy
See, e.g., United States v. Zarattini, 552 F.2d 753, 757 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 942 , 97 S.Ct. 2661 , 53 L.Ed.2d 262 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward Udziela
See also United States v. Zarattini, 552 F.2d 753, 756 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 942 , 97 S.Ct. 2661 , 53 L.Ed.2d 262 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Mavrick
See also United States v. Zarattini, 552 F.2d 753, 760 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 942 , 97 S.Ct. 2661 , 53 L.Ed.2d 262 (1977) (crime requires only knowledge that the goods were stolen.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cranmore v. State
See also Virgil v. State, 84 Wis.2d 166, 183 , 267 N.W.2d 852 (1978). 14 Id. 15 Assuming, arguendo, that in this instance it was found to be in error. 16 United States v. Zarattini, 552 F.2d 753 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 942 (1977); United States v. Jones, 540 F.2d 465 (10th Cir. 1976), cert denied, 429 U.S. 1101 (1977); United States v. Smith, 550 F.2d 277 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 841 ; Carter v. United States, 281 F.2d 640 (D.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Haugen
v.
Taylor
v.
Taylor
No. 76-6551.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 31, 1977.
Published
Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.