Idaho ex rel. Evans v. Oregon, 431 U.S. 952 (1977). · Go Syfert
Search
Idaho ex rel. Evans v. Oregon, 431 U.S. 952 (1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Muhammad v. Giant Food, Inc. (ca4, 2004-08-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) ca5 1977
5th Cir. · 1977 · confidence medium
PER CURIAM: 1 The Supreme Court of the United States, 1977, 431 U.S. 952 , 97 S.Ct. 2669 , 53 L.Ed.2d 268 , vacated the judgment of this Court in Resendis v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc., 5 Cir. 1974, 505 F.2d 69 , and remanded the cause to this Court for further consideration in light of East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. Rodriguez, 1977, 431 U.S. 395 , 97 S.Ct. 1891 , 52 L.Ed.2d 453 . 2 In our decision, 505 F.2d 69 , we affirmed the holding of the District Court that plaintiffs Arturo Rodriguez and Wilburn White failed to prove that the defendant discriminated against them.
discussed Cited "see" Muhammad v. Giant Food, Inc.
4th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nance v. Union Carbide Corp., 540 F.2d 718 , 723 n. 9 (4th Cir.1976) (“The language of Rule 23(c) makes it quite clear that the determination of class status is to be made before the decision on the merits.” (internal quotation marks omitted)), vacated in part on other grounds, 431 U.S. 952 , 97 S.Ct. 2671 , 53 L.Ed.2d 268 (1977).
discussed Cited "see" Paoloni v. Goldstein
D. Colo. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
First, the Reliance Defendants have failed to identify, and I have not found, any instance in which a court denied a litigant standing to pursue a third party’s claim where it had been assigned the claim pursuant to a valid contract. 7 Second, the law is clear that “the plaintiff, not the judicial system, controls whether or not to ask for class action treatment.” Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 760 (3rd Cir.1974); see Nance v. Union Carbide Corp., 540 F.2d 718, 721-22 (4th Cir.1976), vacated on other grounds, 431 U.S. 952 , 97 5.
discussed Cited "see" Idaho Ex Rel. Evans v. Oregon (2×)
SCOTUS · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See 431 U. S. 952 (1977).
discussed Cited "see" Wajda v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance
E.D. Pa. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nance v. Union Carbide Corporation, 540 F.2d 718, 727 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 952 , 97 S.Ct. 2671 , 53 L.Ed.2d 268 (1976); Gonzalez v. Bolger, 486 F.Supp. 595, 601 (D.D.C.1980), aff’d mem. 656 F.2d 899 , 28 Fep.
cited Cited "see" Bickley v. University of Maryland
D. Maryland · 1981 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Nance v. Union Carbide Corp., 540 F.2d 718, 727 (4th Cir. 1976), vacated on other grounds, 431 U.S. 952 , 97 S.Ct. 2671 , 53 L.Ed.2d 268 (1977); King v. Seaboard Coastline Ry.
cited Cited "see" Mobley v. Acme Markets, Inc.
D. Maryland · 1979 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Nance v. Union Carbide Corp., 540 F.2d 718, 727 (4th Cir. 1976), vacated on other grounds, 431 U.S. 952 , 97 S.Ct. 2671 , 53 L.Ed.2d 268 (1977); King v. Seaboard Coastline Ry.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." David Partington v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Nance v. Union Carbide Corp., 540 F.2d 718, 724 (4th Cir.1976) (declining to recognize implied class certification on the facts presented), vacated on other grounds by 431 U.S. 952 , 97 S.Ct. 2671 , 53 L.Ed.2d 268 (1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Partington v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Nance v. Union Carbide Corp., 540 F.2d 718, 724 (4th Cir.1976) (declining to recognize implied class certification on the facts presented), vacated on other grounds by 431 U.S. 952 , 97 S.Ct. 2671 , 53 L.Ed.2d 268 (1977).
Idaho ex rel. Evans, Governor of Idaho
v.
Oregon
No. 67, Orig..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 6, 1977.
431 U.S. 952
Published

It is ordered that the Honorable Jean Sala Breitenstein, Senior Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, is appointed Special Master in this case with authority to fix the time and conditions for filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem necessary to call for. The Master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.

The Master shall be allowed his actual expenses. The allowances to him, the compensation paid to his technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his report, and all other proper expenses shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court may hereafter direct.

It is further ordered that if the position of Special Master in this case becomes vacant during a recess of the Court, The Chief Justice shall have authority to make a new designation which shall have the same effect as if originally made by the Court. [For earlier orders herein, see, e. g., 429 U. S. 163.]