green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Samuel Wayne Loveday
See Rippy v. Sta te, 550 S.W.2d 636 , 640 (Tenn. 1977). 6 A “showup” is a one-on-one confron tation where a single individual is “presented as a suspect to a viewing eyewitness.” United States v. Sanders, 547 F.2d 1037 , 1 040 (8th Cir. 1976 ), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 956 , 97 S. Ct. 2679 , 53 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carl E. Lee, A/K/A Nookie
See United States v. Funk, 985 F.2d 391, 394 (8th Cir. 1993). 5 "The uncorroborated testimony of a single eyewitness, if believed, may be sufficient to sustain an identification upon which a conviction depends." United States v. Sanders, 547 F.2d 1037, 1040 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 956 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Loggins
(2×)
See United States v. Sanders, 547 F.2d 1037, 1042-43 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 956 , 97 S.Ct. 2679 , 53 L.Ed.2d 273 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Devorce
Accord, United States v. Abel, 548 F.2d 591, 592 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 956 , 97 S.Ct. 2678 , 53 L.Ed.2d 273 (1977); United States v. Cheshire, 569 F.2d 887, 889 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 437 U.S. 907 , 98 S.Ct. 3097 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1138 (1978). *199 “The appellants have argued that [the aircraft’s owner] had no authority to grant to the officers permission to install the transponder.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Lee Derring
(2×)
See United States v. Sanders, 547 F.2d 1037, 1040 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 956 , 97 S.Ct. 2679 , 53 L.Ed.2d 273 (1977); United States v. Monteer, 512 F.2d 1047, 1050 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 855 , 96 S.Ct. 103 , 46 L.Ed.2d 80 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael H. Miroyan, United States of America v. Eugene Logan McGinnis
Accord, United States v. Abel, 548 F.2d 591, 592 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 956 , 97 S.Ct. 2678 , 53 L.Ed.2d 273 (1977); cf. United States v. Hufford, supra, 539 F.2d at 34 . 17 We therefore hold that the installation of the transponder, performed with the consent of the aircraft's owner and while the plane was within his dominion, did not violate the fourth amendment rights of Miroyan or McGinnis.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillips
Accord, United States v. Abel, 548 F.2d 591, 592 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 956 , 97 S.Ct. 2678 , 53 L.Ed.2d 273 (1977); cf. United States v. Hufford, supra, 539 F.2d at 34 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Winograd
(See People v Hailstock, 54 Misc 2d 952, 955-956 ; see, also, United States v Abel, 548 F2d 591, 592, cert den 431 US 956 [owners consent to installation of beeper in rented airplane].) The use of a video camera to record from and in a common area what could otherwise be seen by the unaided eye did not elevate the intrusion to constitutional dimension (United States v Kim, 415 F Supp 1252, 1258 [binoculars on hallway]; United States v Lace, 502 F Supp 1021,1041 [same]; State v Okubo, 651 P2d 494, 504 [Hawaii] [video tape]; see, also, People v Price, 54 NY2d 557, 563 ; United States v Knotts, 4…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Berryfast, Inc., a California Corporation v. Seymour Zeinfeld and Shirley Zeinfeld, Steel Fastener Company, Inc.
See, e.g., Superior Concrete Accessories, Inc. v. Kemper, 284 S.W.2d 482, 490 (Mo.1955); see also Lockewill, Inc. v. United States Shoe Corp., 547 F.2d 1024, 1028-29 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 956 , 97 S.Ct. 2678 , 53 L.Ed.2d 272 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Industrial Syndicate, Inc. v. Western Auto Supply Company
See also Lockewill v. United Shoe Corp., 547 F.2d 1024, 1028-1029 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 956 , 97 S.Ct. 2678 , 53 L.Ed.2d 272 (1977) (applying Missouri law); 3 Corbin on Contracts § 1266 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tussell
Compare United States v. Abel, 548 F.2d 591 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 956 , 97 S.Ct. 2678 , 53 L.Ed.2d 273 (1977), with People v. Smith, 67 Cal.App.3d 638 , 136 Cal.Rptr. 764 (5th App.Dist.1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wallschleger
v.
Maryland
v.
Maryland
No. 76-6335.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 6, 1977.
Published
Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.