green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 9×
15.6 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, last quoted 1980 ·
…a sex-predicated wage differential is immune from attack under title vii only if it comes within one of the four enumerated exceptions to the equal pay act.
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
West Point-Pepperell, Inc. v. Farley Inc.
But see Shull v. Dain, Kalman & Quail, Inc., 561 F.2d 152, 156 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978) (implied right of action for damages by an investor against a broker); Koppers Co. v. American Express Co., 689 F.Supp. 1371 (W.D.Pa.1988) (preliminary injunction issued for margin violation).
discussed
Cited "but see"
In re Industrial Gas Antitrust Litigation
But cf. Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 455 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978) (suggesting in dictum— prior to the Fourth Circuit’s en banc reversal — that Judge Wyzanski’s approach might have merit); Link v. Mercedes-Benz of N. Am., Inc., supra, 550 F.2d at 876-78 (Gibbons, J., dissenting) (approving Judge Wyzanski’s approach, but with serious reservations).
cited
Cited "but see"
National Tank Truck Carriers v. Lewis
But see Tax Analysts and Advocates v. Blumenthal, 566 F.2d 130 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978), a companion case, where another panel of the D.C.
cited
Cited "but see"
Huddleston v. Herman & MacLean
But see Shull v. Dain, Kalman & Quail, Inc., 561 F.2d 152, 159 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978) [rejecting implied action under § 17(a)].
cited
Cited "but see"
Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,642, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,919, 8 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 61 Ralph E. Huddleston and Chester E. Bradley, Jr., Individually and as Designated Class Representatives v. Herman & MacLean Etc., Herman & MacLean Certified Public Accountants, a Partnership, and Lawrence A. Lopatin, Leslie Share
But see Shull v. Dain, Kalman & Quail, Inc., 561 F.2d 152, 159 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978) (rejecting implied action under § 17(a)).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Cleda Jean Chappell v. Emco MacHine Works Company
But see Bethel v. Jefferson, 191 U.S.App.D.C. 108 , 118 n.64, 589 F.2d 631 , 641 n.64 (1978), and Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 185 U.S.App.D.C. 322, 368 , 567 F.2d 429, 475 (1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978). in which the District of Columbia Circuit held that the timely filing was not a jurisdictional prerequisite and that equitable tolling principles applied. .
discussed
Cited "but see"
Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. National Student Marketing Corp.
With less frequency and certitude, such an action has also been sanctioned under § 17(a), see e. g., Daniel v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 561 F.2d 1223, 1244-45 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. granted, 434 U.S. 1061 , 98 S.Ct. 1232 , 55 L.Ed.2d 761 (1978); Forrestal Village, Inc. v. Graham, 179 U.S.App.D.C. 225 , 551 F.2d 411, 413 (1977); but see Shull v. Dain, Kalman & Quail, Inc., 561 F.2d 152, 159 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gulf States Reorganization Group, Inc. v. Nucor Corp.
we perceive no distinction between the terms combination and conspiracy____
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Yourman v. Dinkins
egal uncertainty, to assist the employer's defense, must pervade and markedly influence the employer's belief; merely that the law is uncertain does not suffice.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Cooper Electric Supply Co., a Corporation, and Richard A. Cooper, Individually v. National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors, and National Association of Electrical Distributors, Amicus-Appellants. Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Cooper Electric Supply Co., a Corporation, and Richard A. Cooper, Individually
that an employer and others in the industry have broken the law for a long time without complaints from employees is plainly not the reasonable ground to which the statute speaks.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Martin v. Cooper Electric Supply Co.
that an employer and others in the industry have broken the law for a long time without complaints from employees is plainly not the reasonable ground to which the statute speaks.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bell v. Cherokee Aviation Corporation
once a plaintiff proves that a defendant has conditioned the sale of one product upon the purchase of another, there is no requirement that he prove that his purchase was coerced by the seller's requirement.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bell v. Cherokee Aviation Corp.
once a plaintiff proves that a defendant has conditioned the sale of one product upon the purchase of another, there is no requirement that he prove that his purchase was coerced by the seller's requirement.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
20 Fair empl.prac.cas. 792, 20 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,204, 23 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,900 Alberta Gunther, Velence M. Vallance, Marion E. Vanderzanden, Yvonne M. Hatton v. The County of Washington, Sheriff Warren Barnes, in His Capacity as Sheriff of Washington County, Captain Stan Friese and Sergeant Clarence Ramseth, in Their Capacities as Washington County Police Officers
a sex-predicated wage differential is immune from attack under title vii only if it comes within one of the four enumerated exceptions to the equal pay act.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gunther v. County of Washington
a sex-predicated wage differential is immune from attack under title vii only if it comes within one of the four enumerated exceptions to the equal pay act.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gunther v. County of Washington
a sex-predicated wage differential is immune from attack under title vii only if it comes within one of the four enumerated exceptions to the equal pay act.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ripley v. EON LABS INC.
See, Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978) (quoting Conley, 355 U.S. at 47 , 78 S.Ct. at 103 ) (“It is not necessary to plead evidence, nor is it necessary to plead the facts upon which the claim is based. ‘To the contrary, all the Rules require is ‘a short and plain statement of the claim’ that will give the defendant fair notice of what the plaintiffs claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.’ ”).
cited
Cited "see"
Amgen Inc. v. Scully, Thomas
See Tax Analysts & Advocates v. Blumenthal, 566 F.2d 130, 142 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Flora v. Firepond, Inc.
See Shull v. Dain, Kalman & Quail, Inc., 561 F.2d 152, 155 (8th Cir.1977) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Glenn v. Daddy Rocks, Inc.
See In re Wirebound Boxes Antitrust Litigation, 128 F.R.D. 268, 270 (D.Minn.1989) (citing Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 449 (3rd Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978)).
cited
Cited "see"
Kline v. Security Guards, Inc.
See Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 455 (3d Cir. 1977), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Schwartz v. Dana Corp./Parish Div.
See Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 455 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 ; Sanneman, 191 F.R.D. at 449 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Williamson v. Shalala
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 567 F.2d 429, 473 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978) (to be continuing in nature, discrimination may not be "limited to isolated incidents but [must] pervaded a series or pattern of events which continue to within” the timely period); Milton v. Weinberger, 645 F.2d 1070, 1077 (D.C.Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shell Oil Co. v. A.Z. Services, Inc.
See Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 62 F.R.D. 124 (E.D.Pa.1973), order vacated, 561 F.2d 434 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978), on remand, 596 F.Supp. 62 (E.D.Pa.1984); Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 393 F.Supp. 1046 (E.D.Pa.1975), judgment vacated, 561 F.2d 434 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978), on remand, 596 F.Supp. 62 (E.D.Pa.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Micro Chemical, Inc. v. Great Plains Chemical Co.
See Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 449-51 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978); Advance Business Systems. & Supply Co. v. SCM Corp., 415 F.2d *1405 55, 64-68 (4th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 920 , 90 S.Ct. 928 , 25 L.Ed.2d 101 (1970). 108.
cited
Cited "see"
Leroy F. Thomas, Jr. v. Howard University Hospital Howard University
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 567 F.2d 429, 465 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Seidman v. American Mobile Systems, Inc.
(2×)
See Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 456 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Waste Management of Illinois, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 567 F.2d 429, 473-74 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Baxley-D v. American Cemetery Association
See Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 453-54 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978); Phillips v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp., 602 F.2d 616, 628 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied 444 U.S. 1074 , 100 S.Ct. 1021 , 62 L.Ed.2d 756 (1980); Yentsch v. Texaco, Inc., 630 F.2d 46, 59 (2d Cir.1980); Blackwell v. Power Test Corp., 540 F.Supp. 802, 816 (D.N.J.1981), aff'd, 688 F.2d 818 (3d Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Baxley-DeLamar Monuments, Inc. v. American Cemetery Ass'n
See Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 453-54 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L,Ed.2d 791 (1978); Phillips v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp., 602 F.2d 616, 628 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied 444 U.S. 1074 , 100 S.Ct. 1021 , 62 L.Ed.2d 756 (1980); Yentsch v. Texaco, Inc., 630 F.2d 46, 59 (2d Cir.1980); Blackwell v. Power Test Corp., 540 F.Supp. 802, 816 (D.N.J.1981), aff'd, 688 F.2d 818 (3d Cir.1982).
examined
Cited "see"
Christiana Mortgage Corp. v. Delaware Mortgage Bankers Ass'n
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 454-56 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. United States Department of Treasury
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 567 F.2d 429, 472 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978); Christman v. American Cyanamid Co., 92 F.R.D. 441, 447 (N.D.W.Va.1981); see also 29 C.F.R. § 1613.602 (a) (1983) (prescribing time limit for contacting EEO officer following handicap discrimination— since reduced to 30 days).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. Marsh
See Sierra Club IV, 714 F.Supp. at 581 (“[I]t would appear sound business practice to design and locate a modern terminal with a view to its capacity to accommodate sup-portably-anticipated cargo types and volume throughout the useful life of the facility.”) The expansion capability of the Sears Island terminal facility is analogous, as concerns its integral relationship to the proposed project, to the expansion capability considered in Greene County Planning Board v. Federal Power Commission, 559 F.2d 1227 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977),…
cited
Cited "see"
Rose v. Bartle
See Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 443 (3d Cir.1977) (citing Tuley v. Heyd, 482 F.2d 590, 593 (5th Cir.1973)), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Rose, Joseph, in No. 88-1634 v. Bartle, Paul, Asher, Robert, Smyth, Joseph A. Jr., Goodman, Bert, Vance, Oscar, Montgomery County, and Republican Party of Montgomery County. (d.c.civ. No. 86-6255). Reed, Trudy W., in No. 88-1646 v. Bartle, Paul B., Banning, Rita C., Demaioribus, James R., Collectively as the Salary Board of Montgomery County, Bartle, Paul, Individually, Asher, Robert, Smyth, Joseph A., Jr., Goodman, Bert, Vance, Oscar, Montgomery County, Republican Party of Montgomery County, Commissioners of the County of Montgomery (d.c.civ. No. 87-6405). Hill, Frederick B. v. Bartle, Paul, Asher, Robert, Smyth, Joseph A., Jr., Goodman, Bert, Vance, Oscar, Montgomery County, and Republican Party of Montgomery County (d.c. Civil 86-6963). Hill, Frederick B. v. Bartle, Paul, Asher, Robert, Smyth, Joseph A., Jr., Goodman, Bert, and Republican Party of Montgomery County, Montgomery County (d.c. Civil 87-3927). Appeal of Frederick Hill, Kolimaga, Walter, in No. 88-1653 v. Bartle, Paul, Asher, Robert, Montgomery County, and Republican Party of Montgomery County (d.c. Civil No. 87-0804)
See Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 443 (3d Cir.1977) (citing Tuley v. Heyd, 482 F.2d 590, 593 (5th Cir.1973)), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Ettinger v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
See Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 456 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.
(2×)
C. 322, 352-355, 567 F. 2d 429 , 459-462 (1976) (intermediate standard; see text following this footnote), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 1086 (1978); Donovan v. KFC National Management Co., 682 F. 2d 603, 605 (CA6 1982) (voluntary conduct that employer knows might violate Act is willful).
cited
Cited "see"
Ottaviani v. State University of New York at New Paltz
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 567 F.2d 429, 464 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
CPC International Inc. v. McKesson
See, Greater Iowa Corp. v McLendon, 378 F2d 783 (8th Cir) (interpreted as holding no private § 17 [a] action exists in Shull v Dain, Kalman & Quail, 561 F2d 152, 155 [8th Cir], cert denied 434 US 1086 ; Architectural League v Bartos, 404 F Supp 304, 313 [SD NY]; Welch Foods v Goldman, Sachs & Co., 398 F Supp 1393, 1399-1401 [SD NY]; Reid v Mann, 381 F Supp 525, 526-528 [ND 111]; Ferland v Orange Groves, 377 F Supp 690, 706-707 [MD Fla]; Cowsar v Regional Recreations, 65 FRD 394, 398 [MD La]; Hardy v Sanson, 356 F Supp 1034, 1038 [ND Ga]; Dyer v Eastern Trust & Banking Co., 336 F Supp 890, 903…
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Mobil Oil Corp.
See Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 452 (3rd Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978); see generally Von Kalinowski 2 Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation § 6G.02[1].
discussed
Cited "see"
Apex Oil Company v. Joseph Dimauro, Triad Petroleum, Inc., Tic Commodities, Inc., Coastal Corporation, Coastal States Marketing, Inc., Belcher Oil Company, the Belcher Company of New York, Inc., Belcher New England, Inc., Belcher New Jersey, Inc., Stinnes Corporation, Stinnes Interoil, Inc., Eastern of New Jersey, Inc., Northeast Petroleum Industries, Inc., Northeast Petroleum Corporation, George E. Warren Corporation, New York Mercantile Exchange and Julian Raber
See Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 446 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978); see also Matsushita, supra. See generally 6 P. Areeda,Antitrust Law paragraphs 1415, 1434, at 84-93, 213-21 (1986). 42 Apex argues that it made no economic sense for defendants individually to nominate early.
discussed
Cited "see"
Apex Oil Co. v. DiMauro
See Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 446 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978); see also Matsushita, supra. See generally 6 P. Areeda, Antitrust Law ¶¶ 1415, 1434, at 84-93, 213-21 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Insurance Co. of America
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 567 F.2d 429 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sims v. Mme. Paulette Dry Cleaners
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, 567 F.2d 429 , 464-65 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977); cf. Donovan v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc., 599 F.Supp. 860, 871 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (describing what is necessary to establish “good faith” under the Portal-to-Portal Act, 29 U.S.C. § 260 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Krome v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
See Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 456 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978); Green, 406 F.2d at 301 ; Brady v. Lac Inc., 72 F.R.D. 22, 29 (S.D.N.
cited
Cited "see"
William Merklin v. United States
See Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 444 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. Department of Treasury
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 567 F.2d 429, 472, 473 (D.C.Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978); Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239, 246 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Starks v. Perloff Bros.
See Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp, 561 F.2d 434, 444-46 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Starks v. Perloff Brothers, Inc.
See Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp, 561 F.2d 434, 444-46 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978). 13 Plaintiffs also argue that, even assuming their union did not breach its duty of fair representation, DelCostello does not require dismissal of the claim against Perloff because there are "[n]o questions of exhausting remedies or the finality of binding arbitration." Plaintiffs' brief at 22.
discussed
Cited "see"
William Dove v. George A. Coupe, James Dovean Jewell v. George A. Coupe, D/B/A Admiral Limousine Service
The federal statute provides: [I]f the employer shows to the satisfaction of the court that the act or omission giving rise to such action was in good faith and that he had reasonable grounds for believing that his act or omission was not a violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, the court may in its sound discretion, award no liquidated damages or award any amount thereof not to exceed the amount specified in [ 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) ]. 29 U.S.C. § 260 (1982); see Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 567 F.2d 429, 464 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Greene County Planning Board
v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
No. 77-481.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1978.
434 U.S. 1086
Brennan, Certiorari.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (3) · Third Circuit (2) · Sixth Circuit (2) · N.D. Alabama (1) · S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of Pacific Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari.