Carter v. Miller, 434 U.S. 356 (1978). · Go Syfert
Search
Carter v. Miller, 434 U.S. 356 (1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“an applicant for a license 1172 who has committed one of the described felonies and a licensee who has done the same are similarly situated, and no justification exists for automatically disqualifying one and not the other.”
77 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Ricky W. Jester (ca7, 1998-04-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Ricky W. Jester
7th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
an applicant for a license 1172 who has committed one of the described felonies and a licensee who has done the same are similarly situated, and no justification exists for automatically disqualifying one and not the other.
cited Cited "see" Mack Quarrels, Jr. v. Robert Brown, Jr. Debbie Negri James Taylor
6th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Miller v. Carter, 547 F.2d 1314, 1321 (7th Cir.1977) (per curiam), aff'd, 434 U.S. 356 (1978) (per curiam); Upshaw v. McNamara, 435 F.2d 1188, 1190 (1st Cir.1970).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Estate of Wilson v. Aiken Industries, Inc.
SCOTUS · 1978 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Carter v. Miller, 434 U. S. 356 (1978); Williams & Wilkins Co. v. United States, 420 U. S. 376 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CARTER, PUBLIC VEHICLE LICENSE COMMISSIONER OF CHICAGO
v.
MILLER.
76-1171.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 1978.
434 U.S. 356
Per Curiam.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 87%
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.

William R. Quinlan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Daniel Pascale and Robert Retke.

Robert Masur argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were Alan Freedman, Howard Eglit, and David Goldberger.[*]

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[*] Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by William B. Spann, Jr., and Robert B. McKay for the American Bar Assn.; and by James R. Madison and Norman C. Hile for the San Francisco Lawyers' Committee for Urban Affairs.