green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cummiskey v. Chandris, S.A.
suspicion, conjecture and speculation are not enough.... the purported fact issue must be actual rather than theoretical, real rather than imaginary.
discussed
Cited "see"
Allard v. Arthur Andersen & Co.(USA)
See Miller v. New York Produce Exch., 550 F.2d 762, 768 (2d Cir.) (“where a defendant’s only sin is its failure to prevent transgressions by the plaintiff, no benefit flows to the public from rewarding the transgressor”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); In re Crazy Eddie Secs.
discussed
Cited "see"
United Steelworkers v. North Star Steel Co.
See Coar v. Kazimir, 990 F.2d 1413, 1419-20 (3d Cir.1993), petition for cert. filed, 62 U.S.L.W. 3060 (U.S. Jul. 9, 1993) (No. 93-62); accord United States v. Tighe, 551 F.2d 18, 20 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United Steelworkers Of America, Afl-Cio-Clc v. North Star Steel Company, Inc.
See Coar v. Kazimir, 990 F.2d 1413, 1419-20 (3d Cir.1993), petition for cert. filed, 62 U.S.L.W. 3060 (U.S. Jul. 9, 1993) (No. 93-62); accord United States v. Tighe, 551 F.2d 18, 20 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Crazy Eddie Securities Litigation
See Cenco, Inc. v. Siedman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449 , 453 (7th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982). "[W]here a defendant's only sin is its failure to prevent transgressions by the plaintiff, no benefit flows to the public from rewarding the transgressor." Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 550 F.2d 762, 568 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oppenheimer-Palmieri Fund, L.P. v. Peat Marwick Main & Co.
See Cenco, Inc. v. Siedman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449 , 453 (7th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982). “[W]here a defendant’s only sin is its failure to prevent transgressions by the plaintiff, no benefit flows to the public from rewarding the transgressor.” Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 550 F.2d 762, 568 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
CEPA Consulting, Ltd. v. King Main Hurdman (In Re Wedtech Securities Litigation)
See Miller v. New York Produce Exch., 550 F.2d 762, 767-68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); Eisenberg v. Feiner, 100 B.R. 157, 173 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1989); Hays and Co. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 885 F.2d 1149, 1154-55 (3d Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.
See Standard Forge and Axle Co. v. Coleman, 551 F.2d 1268, 1269-70 (D.C.Cir.1972), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 81 (1977); Nader, 551 F.2d at 271 ; see also Independent Cosmetic Manufacturers and Distributors, Inc. v. United States Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, 574 F.2d 553, 554 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 893 , 99 S.Ct. 250 , 58 L.Ed.2d 238 (1978). 18 This Court embraces this construction.
discussed
Cited "see"
Berg v. United States
See Miller v. New York Produce Exch., 550 F.2d 762, 769 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977) (a challenge to a district court order dismissing a claim against a corporation for the actions of its employees is moot after a verdict is delivered in favor of the employees).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berg v. United States
See Miller v. New York Produce Exch., 550 F.2d 762, 769 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977) (a challenge to a district court order dismissing a claim against a corporation for the actions of its employees is moot after a verdict is delivered in favor of the employees).
discussed
Cited "see"
Louis J. Bornstein v. Richard E. Poulos, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Blier Cedar Company, Inc.
See Miller v. New *447 York Produce Exchange, 550 F.2d 762, 767-68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); 4A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 70.28, at 385 (14th ed. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hutchison Bros. Excavating Co. v. District of Columbia
See District of Columbia v. North Washington Neighbors, Inc., 367 A.2d 143, 147 (D.C.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977) (agency not required to initiate rulemaking when resulting rules merely describe controlling provisions); see also Metzenbaum v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 219 U.S.App.D.C. 57, 66 , 675 F.2d 1282, 1291 (1982) (rulemaking not necessary when statutory standard is precise; agency given no discretion to deviate from precise course established by statute).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gregory Marketing Corporation and Daniel Scher v. Wakefern Food Corporation and Red Cheek, Inc.
(2×)
Associated General Contractors, 459 U.S. at 536-537 , 103 S.Ct. at 908 ; see Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Industries, 552 F.2d 90, 99 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company
(2×)
See Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 550 F.2d 762, 767 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Everett, George
“Distribute” is defined to mean “deliver,” 21 U.S.C. § 802 (11) (1976), and “deliver” is defined as “the actual, constructive, or attempted transfer of a controlled substance.” Id. at § 802(8); see United States v. Tighe, 551 F.2d 18, 20 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Laurence J. Gordon, Inc. v. Brandt, Inc.
See Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., 552 F.2d 90 (3rd Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1978) (reversing the district court’s granting of summary judgment which held that restrictions imposed on an agent cannot violate the antitrust laws).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shaw v. Russell Trucking Line, Inc.
See Bravmen v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., 552 F.2d 90 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1978); International Ass’n of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers v. United Contractors Ass’n, 483 F.2d 384 (3d Cir. 1973), amended, 494 F.2d 1353 (3d Cir. 1974).
cited
Cited "see"
George Lambert, and Third-Party v. Morania Oil Tanker Corp., and Third-Party v. Lonnie James Pfaudler, Third-Party
See Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 550 F.2d 762, 769 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
See Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., 552 F.2d 90, 102 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Fleer Corp. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.
See Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., 552 F.2d 90, 102 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.ct. 69, 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
California State Council Of Carpenters v. Associated General Contractors Of California, Inc.
See Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Indus., Inc., 552 F.2d 90, 99 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); Cromar Co. v. Nuclear Materials & Equip.
cited
Cited "see"
California State Council of Carpenters v. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc.
See Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Indus., Inc., 552 F.2d 90, 99 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); Cromar Co. v. Nuclear Materials & Equip.
discussed
Cited "see"
Spivey v. Barry
See D.C. v. North Washington Neighbors, Inc., 367 A.2d 143 (D.C.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); Junghans v. Dept, of Human Resources, 289 A.2d 17, 23 (D.C.1972). 13.
discussed
Cited "see"
P. J. Taggares Co. v. New York Mercantile Exchange
(2×)
Id. at 820 ; accord, Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 550 F.2d 762, 767 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); cf. Lagorio v. Board of Trade, 529 F.2d 1290 , 1291 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3171 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1187 (1976) (rejecting challenge to Board’s action in suspending trading in futures contracts but excepting new sales for actual delivery). 23 .
cited
Cited "see"
Dale S. Bogus v. American Speech & Hearing Association
See Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Inds., Inc., 552 F.2d 90 , 98 & n.19 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); P. Areeda & D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fuchs Sugars & Syrups, Inc. v. Amstar Corp.
See Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., 552 F.2d 90, 100 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); cf. International Railways of Central America v. United Brands Co., 358 F.Supp. 1363, 1370, 1372, 1373 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff’d on other grounds, 532 F.2d 231 (2d Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Grimes
Here, the court properly exercised its discretion in precluding both witnesses from testifying on the ground that the invocation of their right against self-incrimination might lead the jury to infer that they, and not defendant, were guilty (see, People v Thomas, supra, at 472; see also, People v Sapia, 41 NY2d 160 , 163-164, cert denied 434 US 823 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Durkin v. Shea
When seeking to avoid a preferential transfer, however, the trustee is not asserting a cause of action belonging to the debtor_”); see also Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 550 F.2d 762, 767-768 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. De La Rosa
It is well settled that a prosecutor need not call a witness, "even an eyewitness, whose testimony his own investigation convinces him would be unreliable, cumulative or irrelevant” (People v Andre W., 44 NY2d 179 , 184; see also, People v Sapia, 41 NY2d 160 , 163, cert denied 434 US 823 ; People v Stridiron, 33 NY2d 287, 292 ; People v Pollak, 130 AD2d 911 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert D. Black
(2×)
See United States v. DiLapi, 651 F.2d 140, 144 (2 Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1428 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982); see also, Alphin v. Henson, 552 F.2d 1033 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 67 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mormels v. Girofinance, S. A.
See, e.g., Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 550 F.2d 762 , 769 n.4 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); CFTC v. J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Perry v. Hartz Mountain Corp.
See, e.g., Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., 552 F.2d 90 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977) (balancing test); Malamud v. Sinclair Oil Corp., 521 F.2d 1142 (6th Cir. 1975) (zone of interests test); Reibert v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 471 F.2d 727 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 938 , 93 S.Ct. 1900 , 36 L.Ed.2d 399 (1973) (direct injury test); Mulvey v. Samuel Goldwyn Productions, 433 F.2d 1073 (9th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 923 , 91 S.Ct. 1377 , 28 L.Ed.2d 662 (1971) (reasonable foreseeability test); Karseal Corp. v. Richfield Oi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Neil Leist, Philip Smith and Incomco v. John Richard Simplot, J. R. Simplot & Co., Simplot Products Co., Inc., Simplot Industries, Inc., Simtag Farms, Inc., Peter J. Taggares, P. J. Taggares & Co., Henry A. Pollack, Harvey B. Pollack, Harvey B. Pollack Company, Gerald Rafferty, Pressner Trading Corp., Benjamin Pressner, Stephen Sundheimer, Jules Nordlight, Edelstein & Co., Inc., Charles Edelstein, Robert Edelstein, Murial Edelstein, Meierfeld & Company, Inc., Gilbert Meierfeld, David Meierfeld, Robert Reardon, F. J. Reardon, Inc., Harold Collins, Caspar Mayerson, Lynnewood Exporting Company, Alex Sinclair, Manning Stoller, Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill, Noyes Inc., Mfx Commodities, Inc., Donald Silver, Duane South, Kenneth Ramm, a & B Farming Inc., Hugh Glenn, Gearheart Farming, Inc., Edward McKay \John\" Humphreys
See, e.g., Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); Master Commodities, Inc. v. Texas Cattle Management Co., 586 F.2d 1352 (10 Cir. 1978); Moody v. Bache & Co., Inc., 570 F.2d 523 (5 Cir. 1978); P.J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leist v. Simplot
See, e.g., Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); Master Commodities, Inc. v. Texas Cattle Management Co., 586 F.2d 1352 (10 Cir. 1978); Moody v. Bache & Co., Inc., 570 F.2d 523 (5 Cir. 1978); P.J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shapiro v. General Motors Corp.
See also the conclusion that the elaboration of the “factual matrix” as proposed in Cromar “recognizes that § 4 standing analysis is essentially a balancing test comprised of many constant and variable factors and that there is no talismanic test capable of resolving all § 4 standing problems.” Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., 552 F.2d 90, 99 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ahmadi
v.
California
v.
California
No. 76-1583.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.