green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Herrera
See Erlenbaugh v. United States, 409 U.S. 289, 248 , 98 S.Ct. 477 , 34 L.Ed.2d 446 (1972) (under in pari materia canon, statutes addressing the same subject matter should generally be read together); see also People v. Harris, 914 P.2d 425, 429-30 (Colo.App.1995) (statutes pertaining to the same subject matter must be read in pari materia to ensure legislative intent is fulfilled and to avoid inconsistency).
discussed
Cited "see"
Planned Parenthood of Indiana v. Carter
See Erlenbaugh v. United States, 409 U.S. 289, 244 , 98 S.Ct. 477 , 34 L.Ed.2d 446 (1972) (stating that application of in pari materia rule of statutory construction "makes the most sense when the statutes were enacted by the same legislative body at the same time").
discussed
Cited "see"
Church of the New Song v. Establishment of Religion on Taxpayers' Money in the Federal Bureau of Prisons
See Theriault v. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 434 U.S. 953 , 98 S.Ct. 493 , 54 L.Ed.2d 321 (1977); Theriault v. Carlson, 339 F.Supp. 375 (N.D.Ga.1972), vacated and remanded, 495 F.2d 390 (5th Cir. 1974), rehearing denied, 498 F.2d 1402 , cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Church of the New Song v. Establishment of Religion on Taxpayers' Money in the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Dr. Harry W. Theriault, Etc. v. Establishment of Religion on Taxpayers' Money in the Federal Bureau of Prisons
See Theriault v. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 434 U.S. 953 , 98 S.Ct. 493 , 54 L.Ed.2d 321 (1977); Theriault v. Carlson, 339 F.Supp. 375 (N.D.Ga.1972), vacated and remanded, 495 F.2d 390 (5th Cir. 1974), rehearing denied, 498 F.2d 1402 , cert. denied sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mincey
v.
Arizona
v.
Arizona
No. 77-5353.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 14, 1977.
Published
Sup. Ct. Ariz. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 902.] Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Richard Oseran, Esquire, of Tucson, Ariz., be appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner.