Mobil Alaska Pipeline Co. v. United States, 437 U.S. 902 (1978). · Go Syfert
Mobil Alaska Pipeline Co. v. United States, 437 U.S. 902 (1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Association against Discrimination in Employment v. City of Bridgeport (ca2, 1979-02-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Association against Discrimination in Employment v. City of Bridgeport
2d Cir. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Davis v. County of Los Angeles, 566 F.2d 1334 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. granted, 437 U.S. 902 , 98 S.Ct. 3087 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1132 (June 19, 1978) (argued Dec. 5, 1978, see 47 U.S.L.W. 3406 ); Weber v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., 563 F.2d 216 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 608 , 58 L.Ed.2d 676 (1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." 19 Fair empl.prac.cas. 115, 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8985 Association Against Discrimination in Employment, Plaintiffs- Appellees- Cross-Appellants v. City of Bridgeport, and Bridgeport Firefighters for Merit Employment, Intervening
2d Cir. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Davis v. County of Los Angeles, 566 F.2d 1334 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. granted, 437 U.S. 902 , 98 S.Ct. 3087 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1132 (June 19, 1978) (argued Dec. 5, 1978, see 47 U.S.L.W. 3406 ); Weber v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., 563 F.2d 216 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 99 S.Ct. 608 , 58 L.Ed.2d 676 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mobil Alaska Pipeline Co.
v.
United States Exxon Pipeline Co. v. United States BP Pipelines, Inc. v. United States and ARCO Pipe Line Co. v. United States
No. A-1054 (Nos. 77-452, 77-457, 77-551, and 77-602).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 19, 1978.
437 U.S. 902
Published

436 U. S. 631. Application for an order directing compliance with conditions of stay received and presented to Mr. Justice Brennan, and by him referred to the Court. It is ordered that the judgment of this Court in the above-entitled cases be issued forthwith.