green
Positive treatment
22.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Mentioned in passing
State v. Lucas, Unpublished Decision (9-21-2001)
(2×)
To constitute a substantial step, the conduct must be strongly corroborative of the actor's criminal purpose." State v. Woods (1976), 48 Ohio St.2d 127 , 132 , death penalty vacated by 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3133 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1153 (1978).
cited
Cited "but see"
State v. Yslas
But see, State v. Shelton, 51 Ohio St.2d 68 , 364 N.E.2d 1152 (1977), vacated on other grounds 438 U.S. 909 , 98 S.Ct. 3133 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1153 (1978).
cited
Cited "but see"
State v. Yslas
But see, State v. Shelton, 51 Ohio St.2d 68 , 364 N.E.2d 1152 (1977), vacated on other grounds 438 U.S. 909 , 98 S.Ct. 3133 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1153 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Laidlaw
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 (1978). {¶40} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 2014-Ohio-259, ¶ 48 (3d Dist.), quoting Bradley at 142 , citing Strickland at 691 . “‘A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., quoting Bradley at 142 and citing Strickl…
discussed
Cited "see"
In re K.S.
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 (1978). {¶56} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 2014-Ohio-259, ¶ 48 (3d Dist.), quoting Bradley at 142 , citing Strickland at 691. “‘A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient -31- Case No. 14-25-13 to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., quoting Bradley at …
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Thompson
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 (1978). {¶35} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been -15- Case No. 1-24-51 different.’” State v. Liles, 2014-Ohio-259, ¶ 48 (3d Dist.), quoting Bradley at 142 , citing Strickland at 691 . “‘A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., quoting Bradley at …
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Baker
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 (1978). {¶27} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 2014-Ohio-259, ¶ 48 (3d Dist.), quoting Bradley at 142 , citing Strickland at 691 . “‘A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., quoting Bradley at 142 and citing Strickl…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Melendez
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 (1978). {¶40} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 2014-Ohio-259, ¶ 48 (3d Dist.), quoting Bradley at 142 , -17- Case No. 9-24-34 citing Strickland at 691 . “‘A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., quoting Bradley at …
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gonzalez
Id.; Crawford; Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967); Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969); State v. Bayless, 48 Ohio St.2d 73, 106 , 357 N.E.2d 1035 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 911 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1155 (1978); accord State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391 , 358 N.E.2d 623 (1976), paragraph three of the syllabus (“Error in the admission of other act testimony is harmless when there is no reasonable possibility that the testimony contributed to the accused’s conviction”), vacated i…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hood
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 (1978). {¶41} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 2014-Ohio-259, ¶ 48 (3d Dist.), quoting Bradley at 142 , citing Strickland at 691 . “‘A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to -20- Case No. 9-24-08 undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., quoting Bradley at …
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cartwright
(2×)
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136 , 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391 , 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 (1978). {¶20} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 2014-Ohio-259 , ¶ 48 (3d Dist.), quoting Bradley at 142, citing Strickland at 691. “‘A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., quoting Bradley at 142 and citing Strick…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Shaw
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 (1978). -9- Case No. 1-23-54 {¶20} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 2014-Ohio-259, ¶ 48 (3d Dist.), quoting Bradley at 142 , citing Strickland at 691 . “‘A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., quoting Bradley at 1…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Wolfe
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 (1978). {¶40} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 2014-Ohio-259, ¶ 48 (3d Dist.), quoting Bradley at 142 , citing Strickland at 691 . “‘A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., quoting Bradley at 142 and citing Strickl…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jones
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 (1978). {¶58} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 2014-Ohio-259, ¶ 48 (3d Dist.), quoting Bradley at 142 , citing Strickland at 691 . “‘A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., quoting Bradley at 142 and citing Strickl…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Samuels-Thomas
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 (1978). {¶8} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 2014-Ohio-259, ¶ 48 (3d Dist.), quoting Bradley at 142 , citing Strickland at 691 . “‘A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to -4- Case No. 14-23-42 undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., quoting Bradley at 1…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cerrato
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St. 3d 136 , 141-142 -8- Case No. 7-23-14 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶19} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brown
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136 , 141- 42 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, Lytle v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶38} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hirschy
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, Lytle v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶20} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lester v. Forshey
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, Lytle v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶61} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’ ” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Benedict
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-42 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio -23- Case No. 3-21-08 St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, Lytle v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶46} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hooper
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶41} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Goins
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶37} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Maddox
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St. 3d 136 , 141–42, 538 N.E.2d 373 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 , 358 N.E.2d 623 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1154 (1978). {¶100} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Schmelmer
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St. 3d 136 , 141–42, 538 N.E.2d 373 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 , 358 N.E.2d 623 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1154 (1978). {¶144} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lotzer
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136 , 141- 142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, Lytle v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶32} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Salyers
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), citing State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396-397 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, Lytle v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶33} Prejudice results when “‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” Bradley at 142 , quoting Strickland at 694. “‘A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., quoting Strickland at 694.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bender v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St. 3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶22} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Harrington
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-42 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶21} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Williams
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-42 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, Lytle v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶44} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Blair
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), citing State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396-397 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, Ohio v. Lytle, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶34} Prejudice results when “‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” Bradley at 142 , quoting Strickland at 694 . “‘Where a conviction is based on * * * [a] no contest plea[], the prejudice element requires the defendant to show that there is reasonable probability that, but for cou…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Womack
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶8} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. McCoy
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), citing State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, Ohio v. Lytle, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶87} Prejudice results when “‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” Bradley at 142 , quoting Strickland at 694 . “‘A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., quoting Strickland at 694 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Shepherd
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St. 3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶39} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re L.R.
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St. 3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶23} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lester
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136 , 141- 142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, Lytle v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶61} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bender
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St. 3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). -14- Case No. 14-19-22 {¶22} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Stein
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), citing State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396-397 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, State v. Lytle, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (Mem) (1978). {¶20} Prejudice results when “‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” Bradley at 142 , quoting Strickland at 694 . “‘A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., quoting -11- Case No. 10-19-04 Strickland at 694 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Chavez
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-42 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Salyers
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-42 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶10} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Redding
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St. 3d 136, 141-42 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). -4- Case No. 14-19-01 {¶8} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Miller
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-142 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶26} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Douglas
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St. 3d 136, 141-42 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶38} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. McCallister
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St. 3d 136, 141-42 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶18} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hill
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St. 3d 136, 141-42 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶28} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dayton
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136 , 141- 142 (1989), citing State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 (1978). {¶116} Prejudice results when “‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” Id. at 142, quoting Strickland at 694 . “‘A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., quoting Strickland at 694 . {¶117} “Ordinarily, the trial court has discretion to decide to give …
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bentz
See State v. Bradley , 42 Ohio St. 3d 136 , 141-42, 538 N.E.2d 373 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle , 48 Ohio St.2d 391 , 396, 358 N.E.2d 623 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds , 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1154 (1978). {¶ 140} "Prejudice results when 'there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.' " State v. Liles , 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dahms
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St. 3d 136 , 141-42 -54- Case No. 13-16-16 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶100} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Parsons
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St. 3d 136, 141-42 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶73} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Costell
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St.3d 136, 141-42 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶147} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Stevens
See State v. Bradley, 42 Ohio St. 3d 136, 141-42 (1989), quoting State v. Lytle, 48 Ohio St.2d 391, 396 (1976), vacated in part on other grounds, 438 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 3135 (1978). {¶41} “Prejudice results when ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been -26- Case No. 1-14-58 different.’” State v. Liles, 3d Dist.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Woods
v.
Ohio
v.
Ohio
No. 76-1308.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jul 3, 1978.
Cited by 61 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Motion of American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Foundation, Inc., for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae and cer-tiorari granted. Judgment vacated insofar as it leaves undisturbed the death penalty imposed, and case remanded for further proceedings. See Lockett v. Ohio, ante, p. 586.