green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
13.4 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Expeditions Unlimited”
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "but see"
Madrid v. Gomez
But see Newman v. Alabama, *1261 559 F.2d 283, 291 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978). 203 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Iris N. McKinney v. Charles A. Whitfield
expeditions unlimited
cited
Cited "see"
WILLIAMSON v. SMTIH
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283 , 288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 (1978); Bush v. Camp, 1:11–CV–64, 2011 WL 2457909 at * 2 n.1 (M.D.
cited
Cited "see"
GOODMAN v. GARDNER
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283 , 288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 (1978); Bush v. Camp, 1:11–CV–64, 2011 WL 2457909 at * 2 n.1 (M.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
RICE v. BERRY
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 (1978) (district courts do not have the “authority to address state officials out of office…”).
cited
Cited "see"
GORDON v. CLARKSON
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283 , 288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 (1978); Bush v. Camp, 1:11–CV–64, 2011 WL 2457909 at * 2 n.1 (M.D.Ga.
cited
Cited "see"
WHITE v. WHITE
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283 , 288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 (1978); Bush v. Camp, 1:11–CV–64, 2011 WL 2457909 at * 2 n.1 (M.D.Ga.
discussed
Cited "see"
SUGGS v. STEVENS
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 (1978) (district courts do not have the “authority to address state officials out of office…”).
discussed
Cited "see"
BOYD v. BAILEY
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 (1978) (district courts do not have the “authority to address state officials out of office…”); Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 229 (1976) (citing Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 491-492 (1973) (“The federal courts do not sit to supervise state prisons, the administration of which is acute interest to the States”).
discussed
Cited "see"
CASLEBERRY v. EKWINIFE
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 (1978) (district courts do not have the “authority to address state officials out of office…”).
discussed
Cited "see"
BOYD v. RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 (1978) (district courts do not have the “authority to address state officials out of office…”).
discussed
Cited "see"
BOYD v. RIVERBEND REHABILITATION FACILITY
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 (1978) (district courts do not have the “authority to address state officials out of office…”).
discussed
Cited "see"
BOYD v. RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 (1978) (district courts do not have the “authority to address state officials out of office…”).
discussed
Cited "see"
BOYD v. RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 (1978) (district courts do not have the “authority to address state officials out of office…”).
discussed
Cited "see"
BOYD v. RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 (1978) (district courts do not have the “authority to address state officials out of office…”).
discussed
Cited "see"
BOYD v. BAILEY
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 (1978) (district courts do not have the “authority to address state officials out of office…”).
cited
Cited "see"
WILSON v. PERRY
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283 , 288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 (1978); Bush v. Camp, 1:11–CV–64, 2011 WL 2457909 at * 2 n.1 (M.D.Ga.
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Smithsonian Institution
See Expeditions Unlimited Aquatic Enters., Inc. v. The Smithsonian Inst., 566 F.2d 289, 296 (D.C.Cir.1977) (panel opinion reprinted as appendix to opinion en banc) (FTCA applies to the Smithsonian because “the nature of its function as a national museum and center of scholarship, coupled with the substantial governmental role in funding and oversight, make the institution an ‘independent establishment of the United States,’ within the ‘federal agency’ definition” contained within the statute (footnotes omitted)), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978); …
discussed
Cited "see"
Cotton v. Adams
See Expeditions Unlimited Aquatic Enterprises, Inc. v. Smithsonian Institution, 566 F.2d 289, 296 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978) (finding that the Smithsonian is an agency for purposes of the Federal Tort Claims Act).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moss v. Stockard
See Expeditions Unlimited Aquatic Enter. v. Smithsonian Inst., 184 U.S.App.D.C. 397 , 399 n. 4, 566 F.2d 289 , 291 n. 4 (1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank Lee Mikeska, James Logan Diez, and Walter D. Williams v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Dept. Of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
(2×)
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
James Felix, A/K/A Muhsin Hassan Al Uqdah v. Jesse R. Rolan
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor v. Williams Enterprises of Georgia, Inc., and Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
See Parnell v. Rapides Parish School Bd., 563 F.2d 180, 185 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978); Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 28(2)(b).
cited
Cited "see"
Albert v. Klevenhagen
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 291 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Alberti v. Klevenhagen
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 291 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Sherry J. Anderson v. City of Atlanta
See Newman v. State of Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 286 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 . 15 .
cited
Cited "see"
Groseclose v. Dutton
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 288 (5th Cir.1977), rev’d in part, 438 U.S. 781 , 98 S.Ct. 3057 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1114 (1978), cert, denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Henry W. Segar v. William French Smith, Attorney General, Henry W. Segar, Cross-Appellants v. William French Smith, Attorney General
(2×)
See EEOC v. AT&T, 556 F.2d 167 , 175 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3145 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1161 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vulcan Pioneers, Inc. v. New Jersey Department of Civil Service
See Response of United States to Order to Show Cause (1/11/84) at 4, n. 5. 3 It is true that, as certain parties argue, this case involves the effect of a consent decree explicitly disclaiming the existence of discrimination, rather than a judicial order entered pursuant to a finding thereof. *723 Nonetheless, courts have held that, where a consent decree exists, “it would frustrate the purposes of Title VII to treat the absence of evidence about ... discrimination in transfer and promotion policies, and [defendant’s] denial of liability for such discrimination, as insuperable obstacles to…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hammerhead Enterprises, Inc. v. Brezenoff
See Expeditions Unlimited Aquatic Enterprises, Inc. v. Smithsonian Inst, 566 F.2d 289 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978) (absolute immunity attaches even where defendant sends a letter that is critical of a business).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Christopher
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978); Smith v. Schneckloth, 414 F.2d 680 (9th Cir.1969); State v. Kidwell, 27 Ariz.App. 466 , 556 P.2d 20 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
ca11 1982
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 288 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Newman v. Alabama
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 288 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dawson v. Kendrick
(2×)
See Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 288 (5th Cir. 1977), remanded with instructions sub nom., Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 781 , 98 S.Ct. 3057 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1114 , cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978); McCray v. Burrell, 516 F.2d 357, 368 (4th Cir. 1975), cert. dismissed, 426 U.S. 471 , 96 S.Ct. 2640 , 48 L.Ed.2d 788 (1976); Bolding v. Holshouser, 575 F.2d 461 , 464—65 (4th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 837 , 99 S.Ct. 121 , 58 L.Ed.2d 133 (1978); Ahrens v. Thomas, 434 F.Supp. 873, 890-91 (W.D.Mo. 1977), modified, 570 F.2d 286 (8th Cir. 1978); see also Wooten …
cited
Cited "see"
Shewmaker v. Minchew
See Expeditions Unlimited Aquatic Enterprises, Inc. v. Smithsonian Instit., 566 F.2d 289 , 292 n.5 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
ca5 1980
See E.E.O.C. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 556 F.2d 167 , 178 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3145 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1161 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. City of Miami
See E.E.O.C. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 556 F.2d 167 , 178 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3145 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1161 (1978).
examined
Cited "see"
Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. v. Village of Arlington Heights
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See EEOC v. AT&T, 556 F.2d 167 , 173 (3d Cir. 1977), cert, denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3145 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1161 (1978); United States v. Ketchikan Pulp Co., 430 F.Supp. 83 (D.Alas. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Benima v. Smithsonian Institution
See Expeditions Unlimited Aquatic Enterprises, Inc. v. Smithsonian Institution, 184 U.S.App.D.C. 397 , at 407 n. 22, 566 F.2d 289 , at 299 n. 22 (1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978) (reinstating portion of panel opinion dealing with Smithsonian).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
SHIFLETT
See e.g., Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283 , 288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 (1978); Bush v. Camp, 1:11–CV–64, 2011 WL 2457909 at * 2 n.1 (M.D.Ga.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ROSS v. WARDEN BEASLEY
See e.g., Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283 , 288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 (1978) (district courts do not have the “authority to address state officials out of office…”); Moye v. Clerk, DeKalb Cnty.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
BOYD v. RIVERBEND REHABILITATION FACILITY
See e.g., Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283 , 288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 (1978) (district courts do not have the “authority to address state officials out of office…”); Sanchez v. McCray, 349 F. App'x 479, 481-82 (11th Cir. 2009) citing Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 224 (1976) (determining that an inmate had “no constitutionally protected liberty interest in being housed in a certain prison or a certain section within a prison”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Austin v. Hopper
See, e.g., Pugh v. Locke, 406 F.Supp. 318 (M.D.Ala.1976), aff'd sub nom, Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Romo v. Champion
Prison administrators’ responsibility for maintaining security includes the duty to “intercept and exclude by all reasonable means all contraband smuggled into the facility.” Hunter v. Auger, 672 F.2d 668, 674 (8th Cir.1982); see also Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 291 (5th Cir.1977) (stating that prison authorities’ “prime consideration is the preservation of the safety and security of the prison,” which includes the “duty to intercept narcotics and other harmful contra band” being smuggled into the facility by visitors), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Romo v. Champion
Prison administrators' responsibility for maintaining security includes the duty to "intercept and exclude by all reasonable means all contraband smuggled into the facility." Hunter v. Auger, 672 F.2d 668, 674 (8th Cir.1982); see also Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 291 (5th Cir.1977) (stating that prison authorities' "prime consideration is the preservation of the safety and security of the prison," which includes the "duty to intercept narcotics and other harmful contraband" being smuggled into the facility by visitors), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jaben v. Moore
See, e.g., Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 291 (5th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978); Lovell v. Brennan, 566 F.Supp. 672 (D.Me.1983), aff'd, 728 F.2d 560 (1st Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Freeman v. City of Philadelphia
Williams v. City of New Orleans, 729 F.2d 1554, 1559-60 (5th Cir.1984) (in banc); see also EEOC v. AT & T, 556 F.2d 167 , 174 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3145 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1161 (1978); Patterson v. Newspaper & Mail Deliverers’ Union, 514 F.2d 767 , 771 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 427 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3198 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1203 (1976); O’Neill, 100 F.R.D. at 356 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kenneth W. Martin v. John P. Malhoyt, John Doe(s) Shirley Ann Stevens v. David H. Stover, John Doe
(2×)
See, e.g., Expeditions Unlimited Aquatic Enterprises, Inc. v. Smithsonian Institution, 566 F.2d 289, 303 (D.C.Cir.1977) (en banc) (Wilkey, J., concurring), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978). 43 McKinney v. Whitfield, 736 F.2d 766, 768 (D.C.Cir.1984). 29 44 Doubts about Barr 's continuing vitality, however, were dispelled in Butz v. Economou, 438 U.S. 478 , 98 S.Ct. 2894 , 57 L.Ed.2d 895 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Young v. Pierce
Id. at 1160; see also Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 289 (5th Cir.1977) (“ ‘[Reviewing plans for implementation of this decree to ensure that they comport with minimum standards set forth’ could more properly have been assigned to a magistrate or to a master, qualified to hold hearings, make findings of fact, and report to the Court for its approval or disapproval.”), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Group Health Inc. v. Blue Cross Ass'n
See, e.g., Expeditions Unlimited Aquatic Enterprises, Inc. v. Smithsonian Institution, 566 F.2d 289, 295 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978); Kletschka v. Driver, 411 F.2d 436, 449 (2d Cir.1969) (“A plea of official immunity cannot be sustained until a court has knowledge of the exact nature of the defendants’ actions and the precise scope of their official duties.”); Liquori v. Alexander, 495 F.Supp. 641, 648 (S.D.N.Y. 1980) (existence of factual dispute as to scope of authority requires further factual development).
Newman
v.
Alabama
v.
Alabama
No. 77-1422.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jul 3, 1978.
Cited by 10 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.