green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Spivey v. Turpin
(2×)
See Spivey v. Georgia, 439 U.S. 1039 , 99 S.Ct. 642 , 58 L.Ed.2d 699 (1978) (mem.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dairies v. Gerace
Relevant factors in determining whether there is a potential for such a disturbance include, inter alia, whether existing enterprises are operating below their capacity in a competitive market (id.; see, Matter of Dellwood Foods v Barber, 90 AD2d 892 ); whether a new licensee would depress prices or unit costs, undermining existing dealers’ ability to operate at a reasonable profit (Matter of Marcus Dairy v Gerace, supra, p 833; see, Matter of Tuscan Dairy Farms v Barber, 45 NY2d 215, 220-221 , appeal dismissed 439 US 1040 ); and whether the birth rate in the market area at issue has decline…
discussed
Cited "see"
Underwood v. American Home Mortgage Corp. (In Re Underwood)
See Mirabel v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 537 F.2d 871 (7th Cir.1976), later app., 576 F.2d 729 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1039 , 99 S.Ct. 642 , 58 L.Ed.2d 699 (1978); Detillo v. J.R.
cited
Cited "see"
Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co. v. Sealy Inc.
See Mirabal v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 576 F.2d 729, 731 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1039 , 99 S.Ct. 642 , 58 L.Ed.2d 699 (1978); Samuels, 80 F.R.D. at 294 .
cited
Cited "see"
Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Company v. Sealy Incorporated
See Mirabal v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 576 F.2d 729, 731 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1039 , 99 S.Ct. 642 , 58 L.Ed.2d 699 (1978); Samuels, 80 F.R.D. at 294 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Paul Elmer Melvin v. Joseph S. Petrovsky, Warden, United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, United States Parole Commission
This includes a presentence report. 18 U.S.C. § 4207 (3); United States ex rel Goldberg v. Warden, 622 F.2d 60, 64-65 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 210 , 66 L.Ed.2d 91 (1980); see Edwards v. United States, 574 F.2d 937, 943-44 (8th Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 1040 , 99 S.Ct. 643 , 58 L.Ed.2d 700 (1979); cf. Wixom v. United States, 585 F.2d 920 (8th Cir.1978) (inappropriate for Commission to consider information in presentence report which was objected to at sentencing and expressly disavowed by sentencing judge).
examined
Cited "see"
Louisiana Credit Union League v. The United States of America
(4×)
See Clarence LaBelle Post No. 217 v. United States, 580 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 1040 , 99 S.Ct. 712 , 58 L.Ed.2d 716 (1979); Disabled American Veterans v. United States, 650 F.2d 1178 (Ct.Cl.1981); 32 Professional Insurance Agents v. Commissioner, 78 T.C. 246 (1982); Smith-Dodd Businessman’s Association v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 620 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Donald L. Hayward v. United States Parole Commission, Joseph Petrovsky, Warden
See Edwards v. United States, 574 F.2d 937, 941 (8th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 1040 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David Lee Rothgeb v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Edwards v. United States, 574 F.2d 937 (8th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 1040 , 99 S.Ct. 643 , 58 L.Ed.2d 700 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Disabled American Veterans v. United States
Compare Clarence LaBelle Post No. 217 v. United States, 580 F.2d 270 (8th Cir. 1978), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 1040 (1978); Hope School v. United States, 612 F.2d 298 (7th Cir. 1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gaetano
v.
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Silbert, U. S. Attorney, Real Party in Interest) Carter v. Texas Rodriguez v. United States
v.
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Silbert, U. S. Attorney, Real Party in Interest) Carter v. Texas Rodriguez v. United States
No. 78-428; No. 78-5051; No. 78-5213.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1978.
Cited by 47 opinions | Published
ante, p. 924;
ante, p. 956 ; and
ante, p. 920. Petitions for rehearing denied.