green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
13.4 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1980 ·
…thus, as stated in hanson, average variable cost can be used as evidence of marginal cost.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 42 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sepmeier v. Tallahassee Democrat, Inc.
. . . the burden placed upon a plaintiff in defeating a motion for summary judgment is a most severe and difficult challenge to meet, though not impossible.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State of Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society, an Arizona Non-Profit Corporation Maricopa Foundation for Medical Care, an Arizona Non-Profit Corporation Pima County Medical Society, an Arizona Non-Profit Corporation and Pima Foundation for Medical Care, an Arizona Non-Profit Corporation, State of Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society, an Arizona Non-Profit Corporation Maricopa Foundation for Medical Care, an Arizona Non-Profit Corporation and Pima Foundation for Medical Care, an Arizona Non-Profit Corporation
(2×)
thus, as stated in hanson, average variable cost can be used as evidence of marginal cost.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society
(2×)
thus, as stated in hanson, average variable cost can be used as evidence of marginal cost.
cited
Cited "see"
Chafin v. Gibson
See Kidder v. Anderson, 354 So.2d 1306 (La. 1978), cert denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Bd.2d 123; Adams v. Frontier Broadcasting Co., 555 P.2d 556 (Wyo.1976). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Rebel Oil Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
(2×)
See Janich Bros., Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848, 855 (9th Cir.1977) (both the Sherman Act and Clayton Act are “aimed at the same economic evil”), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rebel Oil Company, Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Company
(2×)
See Janich Bros., Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848, 855 (9th Cir.1977) (both the Sherman Act and Clayton Act are "aimed at the same economic evil"), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978). 75 In holding that a primary-line plaintiff must demonstrate an injury flowing from an aspect of the defendant's conduct injurious to consumer welfare, we intend in no way to affect the standard for antitrust injury in secondary-line cases.
cited
Cited "see"
Capital Consulting Group, Ltd. v. Rochman
See Marina Management Corporation v. Brewer, 572 F.2d 43, 46-47 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S. Ct. 104 , 58 L.
examined
Cited "see"
U.S. Philips Corp. And North American Philips Corp. v. Windmere Corporation, Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
(4×)
Accord Janich Bros., Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848, 858 (9th Cir.1977), cert denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978) (affirming directed verdict for a defendant on a predatory pricing claim because of the inadequacy of plaintiff’s accounting evidence: “a firm’s marginal costs cannot be ascertained from conventional business records.
discussed
Cited "see"
Consul Limited, Kenneth B. Wilson Dba Ken Wilson Associates v. Solide Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation, and Hrh Operating Company, a Corporation
See Marina Management Corp. v. Brewer, 572 F.2d 43 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 104 , 58 L.Ed.2d 123 (1978); Poverman v. Walnut Hill Plaza, Inc., 261 F.Supp. 176, 178 (D.R.I.1966); Horwitz v. Food Town, Inc., 241 F.Supp. 1, 2-3 (E.D.La.1965), aff’d 367 F.2d 584 (5th Cir.1966); Campbell v. Duncan, 84 F.Supp. 732, 734-36 (E.D.Ark.1949).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Collins Communications, Inc.
(2×)
See Janich Bros., Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848, 859-860 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hume v. Hertz Corp.
See Marina Management Corp. v. Brewer, 572 F.2d 43 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 104 , 58 L.Ed.2d 123 (1978) where the Second Circuit, in affirming a Connecticut district court's determination that the Connecticut Supreme Court would bar an unlicensed real estate broker from recovering a brokerage commission on an aborted sale of a marina, commented that "we are unaware of any State procedure by which we could certify this question to the Connecticut courts.” Id. at 46 .
examined
Cited "see"
MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company
(4×)
See Janich Bros. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848, 855 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Quality Foods De Centro America, S.A. And Duroparts De El Salvador, S.A. v. Latin American Agribusiness Development Corporation, S.A.
See Janich Bros., Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848, 855 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 *999 U.S. 829, 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Nevada Independent Broadcasting Corp. v. Allen
See Kidder v. Anderson, 345 So.2d 922 (La.App. 1977), rev’d, 354 So.2d 1306 (La. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 (1978); Stone v. Essex County Newspapers, Inc., 330 N.E.2d 161 (Mass. 1975).
examined
Cited "see"
Gweldon Lee Paschall and All Intervenors v. The Kansas City Star Company
(4×)
See Janich Bros., Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848, 858 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978).
examined
Cited "see"
Island Tobacco Co. v. R. J. Reynolds Industries, Inc.
(4×)
See Janich Bros., Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978); Hanson v. Shell Oil Co., 541 F.2d 1352 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1074 , 97 S.Ct. 813 , 50 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977); California Computer Products, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp., 613 F.2d 727 (9th Cir. 1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Northeastern Telephone Company v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company
(2×)
See Janich Brothers, Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848 , 857 n.9 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978); McGee, supra, at 306-07. *88 Furthermore, this case does not present us with a stark choice between long run and short run welfare maximization, since SNET did not set its prices solely with respect to short term marginal costs.
discussed
Cited "see"
Richter Concrete Corp. v. Hilltop Basic Resources, Inc.
(2×)
See Janich Bros. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848, 855 (9th Cir. 1977), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978); International Air Industries, supra, 517 F.2d at 721 ; and Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. FTC, 289 F.2d 835, 840 (7th Cir. 1961).
examined
Cited "see"
Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc., and Mission Gas Oil Company, Inc. And Petroleum Products Co. v. Texaco, Inc
(4×)
See Janich Bros., Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848 , 855 n.6 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978); International Air Industries, Inc. v. American Excelsior Co., 517 F.2d 714, 721-22 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1411 , 47 L.Ed.2d 349 (1976); M.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re IBM Peripheral EDP Devices, Etc.
(2×)
See id., at 700-03 . [76] For a diagrammatic representation of the relationship between these cost measures and the quantity of output, see id., at 701 n. 14. [77] The monopolist would only have these options if the demand curve intersected the average cost curve to the left of minimum average cost. [78] 541 F.2d 1352 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1074 , 97 S.Ct. 813 , 50 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977). [79] 570 F.2d 848 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978). [80] Id., at 853. [81] Id.; Hallmark Industry v. Reynolds Metals Co., 489 F.2d 8, 12 (9th Cir…
discussed
Cited "see"
Dart Drug Corp. v. Corning Glass Works
(2×)
See Janich Bros., Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848, 854-5 (9 Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
California Steel and Tube v. Kaiser Steel Corp.
See Janich Bros., Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848, 857-58 (9th Cir. 1977), cert, denied, - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978); Hanson v. Shell Oil Co., 541 F.2d 1352, 1358 (9th Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 1074 , 97 S.Ct. 813 , 50 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Multidistrict Vehicle Air Pollution. Amf, Incorporated
See Dungan v. Morgan Drive-Away, Inc., 570 F.2d 867 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
AMF, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.
See Dungan v. Morgan Drive-Away, Inc., 570 F.2d 867 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John E. Trytko, Jr. v. Hubbell, Inc., Cross-Appellee
(2×)
See e.g., Janich Bros., Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848, 860 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978); Musgrave v. Union Carbide Corp., 493 F.2d 224, 231 (7th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Callahan v. Nystedt
The following elements must be met in order to invoke the attorney-client privilege: “(1) the asserted holder of the privilege is or sought to become a client; (2) the person to whom the communication was made (a) is a member of the bar of a court, or his subordinate and (b) in connection with this communication is acting as a lawyer; (3) the communication relates to a fact of which the attorney was informed (a) by his client (b) without the presence of strangers (c) for the purpose of securing primarily either (i) an opinion on law or (n) legal services or (iii) assistance in some legal pro…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Distribution Centers, Inc. v. Walsh Trucking Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Janich Brothers, Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848, 853 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978); Lessig v. Tidewater Oil Co., 327 F.2d 459, 474 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 993 , 84 S.Ct. 1920 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1046 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Distribution Centers, Inc. v. Walsh Trucking Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Janich Brothers, Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848, 853 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978); Lessig v. Tidewater Oil Co., 327 F.2d 459, 474 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 993 , 84 S.Ct. 1920 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1046 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Norton Tire Co. v. Tire Kingdom Co.
(2×)
See, Forro Precision, Inc. v. IBM, 673 F.2d 1045, 1095 (9th Cir.1982); see also, Janich Brothers v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
M.A.P. Oil Co. v. Texaco Inc.
(2×)
See also Janich Bros., Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848 , 853-54 & n. 4 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978); Hallmark Industry v. Reynolds Metals Co., 489 F.2d 8, 12-13 (9th Cir.1973) (“evidence of market power may be relevant, but it is not indispensable where a substantial claim of restraint of trade is made”), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 932 , 94 S.Ct. 2643 , 41 L.Ed.2d 235 (1974); Bushie v. Stenocord Corp., 460 F.2d 116, 121 (9th Cir. 1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
M.A.P. Oil Company, Inc. v. Texaco Inc.
(2×)
See also Janich Bros., Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848 , 853-54 & n. 4 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978); Hallmark Industry v. Reynolds Metals Co., 489 F.2d 8, 12-13 (9th Cir.1973) ("evidence of market power may be relevant, but it is not indispensable where a substantial claim of restraint of trade is made"), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 932 , 94 S.Ct. 2643 , 41 L.Ed.2d 235 (1974); Bushie v. Stenocord Corp., 460 F.2d 116, 121 (9th Cir. 1972). 27 Bushie, in particular, provides guidance on this issue.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
CSB, Inc. v. Cradle of Democracy Broadcasting Co.
See also Marina Management Corp. v. Brewer, 572 F.2d 43, 48 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 104 , 58 L.Ed.2d 123 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. In the Matter of Andrew C. Pavlick. United States of America
(2×)
See also United States v. Kelly, 569 F.2d 928, 938 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Ed.2d 123 (1978).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Dimmitt Agri Industries, Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Cpc International Inc.
(4×)
See, e.g., Janich Bros., Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978) (proof of predatory conduct can in some circumstances permit inferences of specific intent and dangerous probability of success); Areeda & Turner III, j] 836(b) at 352-55.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. In the Matter of Andrew C. Pavlick. Appeal of United States of America
(2×)
See also United States v. Kelly, 569 F.2d 928, 938 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Ed.2d 123 (1978).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
O. Hommel Company v. Ferro Corporation
(4×)
See also Janich Bros., Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848, 856 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978); Areeda and Turner, Predatory Pricing and Belated Practices Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 88 Harv.L.Rev. 697, 698 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Unijax, Inc. v. Champion International, Inc.
(2×)
See e. g., Janich Brothers, Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848, 853 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978); Martin B.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barry Wright Corp. v. ITT Grinnell Corp.
See, e.g., Janich Brothers, Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848, 855 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 ; International Air Industries, Inc. v. American Excelsior Co., 517 F.2d 714, 724 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 943 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Pork Producers Council v. Bergland
(2×)
See also Westport Taxi Serv., Inc. v. Adams, 571 F.2d 697 , 700 n.3 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Pork Producers Council v. Bergland
(2×)
See also Westport Taxi Serv., Inc. v. Adams, 571 F.2d 697 , 700 n.3 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chillicothe Sand & Gravel Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Martin Marietta Corporation, a Maryland Corporation
(2×)
See also Janich Bros., Inc. v. American Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 103 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1978). 6 *432 However, Areeda and Turner’s position has not been universally accepted.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John L. Warren, Jr., David Defina, Des E. Schick and Thomas A. Warren
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Kelly, 569 F.2d 928 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Ed.2d 123 (1978); Yielding v. United States, 173 F.2d 46 (5th Cir. 1949); Levi v. United States, 71 F.2d 353 (5th Cir. 1934); Greene v. United States, 154 F. 401 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 207 U.S. 596 , 28 S.Ct. 261 , 52 L.Ed. 357 (1907).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Westport Taxi Service, Inc.
v.
Adams, Secretary of Transportation
v.
Adams, Secretary of Transportation
No. 77-1700.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (4) · Florida Circuit Courts (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.