green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1986 ·
…it is beyond question that the closely related doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel apply to criminal as well as civil causes
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Robinson v. State
it is beyond question that the closely related doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel apply to criminal as well as civil causes
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bowling v. State
it is beyond question that the closely related doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel apply to criminal as well as civil causes
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. City of College Park, GA
See Chambliss v. Foote, 421 F.Supp. 12, 15 (E.D.La.1976), aff'd, 562 F.2d 1015 (5th Cir.1977) (affirming on basis of district court’s opinion), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 839 , 99 S.Ct. 127 , 58 L.Ed.2d 137 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Scott v. State
See Cook v. State, 281 Md. 665, 668 , 381 A.2d 671 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 839 , 99 S.Ct. 126 , 58 L.Ed.2d 136 (1978). [UJnder the doctrine of res judicata, sometimes known as direct estoppel, a final and valid judgment rendered in one proceeding between two parties operates as a bar in a second proceeding between them on all matters that have been or could have been decided in the original litigation, where the second proceeding involves the same subject matter as the first cause of action.
cited
Cited "see"
Bobbitt v. Allied-Signal, Inc.
See Wilson v. State, 281 Md. 640, 659 , 382 A.2d 1053 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 839 , 99 S.Ct. 126 , 58 L.Ed.2d 136 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bailey
(2×)
See Wilson v. State, 281 Md. 640, 644 , 382 A.2d 1053 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 839 , 99 S.Ct. 126 , 58 L.Ed.2d 136 (1978); Jones v. State, 279 Md. 1, 6 , 367 A.2d 1 (1976), cert denied, 431 U.S. 915 , 97 S.Ct. 2177 , 53 L.Ed.2d 225 (1977); Erbe v. State, 276 Md. 541, 546-547 , 350 A.2d 640 (1976); Smith v. State, 276 Md. 521, 527-528 , 350 A.2d 628 (1976); Epps v. State, 276 Md. 96, 105-106 , 345 A.2d 62 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
McCubbins v. Dawson
See State v. Treadway, 558 S.W.2d 646, 649 (Mo. banc 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 839 , 99 S.Ct. 124 , 58 L.Ed.2d 135 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Beachem v. State
See Wilson v. State, 281 Md. 640, 658 , 382 A.2d 1053 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 839 , 99 S.Ct. 126 , 58 L.Ed.2d 136 (1978) (delay of more than four years from arrest until trial deemed presumptively prejudicial to defendant’s right to speedy trial and burden shifts to State to rebut presumption).
cited
Cited "see"
Morgan v. Morgan
See Cook v. State, 281 Md. 665, 669 , 381 A.2d 671 , cert. denied 439 U.S. 839 , 99 S.Ct. 126 , 58 L.Ed.2d 136 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Powell v. State
See State v. Hicks, 285 Md. 310, 335 , 403 A.2d 356 (1979), Wilson v. State, 281 Md. 640 , 382 A.2d 1053 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 839 , 99 S.Ct. 126 , 58 L.Ed.2d 136 (1978), and State v. Green, 54 Md.App. 260 , 458 A.2d 487 (1983). 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mayberry v. Dees
See Chambliss v. Foote, 421 F.Supp. 12, 15 (E.D.La.1976) (“The evidence does not support a finding of any causal connection between the statements made or demonstrative activities engaged in by the plaintiff or her husband and the non-renewal of her contract.”), aff’d on basis of the district court’s opinion, 562 F.2d 1015 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 839 , 99 S.Ct. 127 , 58 L.Ed.2d 137 (1978); Markwell v. Culwell, 515 F.2d 1258 (5th Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert J. Mayberry v. William Dees, Chairman, Board of Governors, University of North Carolina, Individually and in His Official Capacity, William Friday, President,university of North Carolina, Individually and in His Official Capacity Robertmorgan, Chairman,board of Trustees, East Carolina University, Individually and in His Officialcapacity Leo W. Jenkins, Chancellor, East Carolina University, Individuallyand in His Official Capacity Robert L. Holt, Vice-Chancellor, East Carolinauniversity,individually and in His Official Capacity Robert W. Williams, Provost, Eastcarolina University, Individually and in His Official Capacity Richardcapwell, Dean Arts and Sciences East Carolina University, Individually and Inhis Official Capacityjoseph Fernandez, Chairman of Romance Languages, East Carolina University,individually and in His Official Capacity, National Education Association, Amicus Curiae. Robert J. Mayberry v. William Dees, Chairman, Board of Governors, University of North Carolina, Individually and in His Official Capacity William Friday, President,university of North Carolina, Individually and in His Official Capacity Robertmorgan, Chairman,board of Trustees, East Carolina University, Individually and in His Officialcapacity Leo W. Jenkins, Chancellor, East Carolina University, Individuallyand in His Official Capacity Robert L. Holt, Vice-Chancellor, East Carolinauniversity,individually and in His Official Capacity Robert W. Williams, Provost, Eastcarolina University, Individually and in His Official Capacity Richardcapwell, Dean, Arts and Sciences, East Carolina University, Individually and Inhis Officialcapacity Joseph Fernandez, Chairman of Romance Languages, East Carolinauniversity, Individually and in His Official Capacity, National Education Association, Amicus Curiae
See Chambliss v. Foote, 421 F.Supp. 12, 15 (E.D.La.1976) ("The evidence does not support a finding of any causal connection between the statements made or demonstrative activities engaged in by the plaintiff or her husband and the non-renewal of her contract."), aff'd on basis of the district court's opinion, 562 F.2d 1015 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 839 , 99 S.Ct. 127 , 58 L.Ed.2d 137 (1978); Markwell v. Culwell, 515 F.2d 1258 (5th Cir. 1975). 51 All in all, therefore, both obstacles in Mayberry's path, combined, have proven too much for him to overcome, even assuming that, had bu…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dean
See Wilson v. State, 281 Md. 640 , 382 A. 2d 1053 (1978), cert. den., 439 U. S. 839 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Howell v. State
See, e.g., Wilson v. State, 281 Md. 640, 654-655 , 382 A.2d 1053 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 839 , 99 S.Ct. 126 , 58 L.Ed.2d 136 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Pippenger
Noll v. Noll, 286 S.W.2d 58, 60-61 (Mo.App.1956); State v. Beaver, 697 S.W.2d 573, 574 (Mo.App.1985); see also Cook v. State, 281 Md. 665 , 381 A.2d 671, 674 (1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 839 , 99 S.Ct. 126 , 58 L.Ed.2d 136 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jaynell M. Iverson
(2×)
See, e. g., Reddy v. Jones, 572 F.2d 979 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 839 , 99 S.Ct. 126 , 58 L.Ed.2d 136 (1978). 101 This trial was not perfect.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Greer
v.
California
v.
California
No. 77-6442.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (2)
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.