green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bernard Martin (94-3236) Terrone Dwayne Reavish (94-3237) Larry Traylor (94-3238) Kevin Israel (94-3351)
See generally United States v. Searp, 586 F.2d 1117 (6th Cir.1978) (discussing Rule 41(c)), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 921 (1979). 8 Although the district court did not determine whether the officers complied with 18 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alan E. Platt
See United States v. Mikka, 586 F.2d 152, 155-56 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 921 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Luis Anthony Rivera
(2×)
See United States v. Johnson, 585 F.2d 374 (8th Cir.1978), cert. den. 440 U.S. 921 , 99 S.Ct. 1246 , 59 L.Ed.2d 473 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Seyferth
See United States v. Searp, 586 F.2d 1117, 1124 (6th Cir. 1978) cert. denied 440 U.S. 921 (1979); People v. Glass, 56 Cal. App.3rd 368, 372, 128 Cal. Rptr. 413, 415-16 (Cal. Ct. App. 1976); People v. Arnow, 108 Misc.2d 128, 130-32 , 436 N.Y.S.2d 950, 952-53 (N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
Walker v. Wolverine Fabricating & Manufacturing Co.
See Gibson v Missouri Pacific R Co, 579 F2d 890 (CA 5, 1978), cert den 440 US 921 ; 99 S Ct 1245 ; 59 L Ed 2d 473 (1979), reh den 440 US 968 ; 99 S Ct 1522 ; 59 L Ed 2d 785 (1979); Pearlswig v Randolph, 497 F Supp 569 (D Mass, 1980); Kelly v Equal Employment Opportunity Comm, 468 F Supp 417 (D Md, 1979). 3 The statute of limitations period still operates to limit a claimant’s right to a jury trial.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brock
(2×)
See United States v. Searp, 586 F2d 1117, 1124 (6th Cir 1978), cert den 440 US 921 (1979). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Broadway
(2×)
See United States v. Searp, 586 F. 2d 1117 (6 Cir.), cert. den. 440 U.S. 921 , 99 S. Ct. 1247 , 59 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Lowayne Box, John Byron Yarbrough, and Leroy Eugene Burch
See also United States v. Brackett, 582 F.2d 1027 n. 1 (5th Cir.1978) (without discussion, we opined that the district court did not err by "[r]efusing to suppress, as impeaching evidence pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 609, evidence of Appellant’s prior bank robbery and manslaughter convictions, thereby effectively preventing Appellant from testifying in his own behalf.”), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 921 , 99 S.Ct. 1247 , 59 L.Ed.2d 473 (1979). 18 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sodders
See also United States v. Searp, 586 F.2d 1117 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 440 U.S. 921 , 99 S. Ct. 1247 , 59 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Samoa Government v. Tauala
In considering a motion for acquittal, a trial court must "determine whether, viewing all the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government and drawing all reasonable inferences and credibility choices in favor of the jury’s verdict, a reasonable trier of fact could find that the evidence established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt." United States v. O’Keefe, 825 F.2d 314, 319 (11th Cir. 1987) (internal citation omitted) (citing United States v. Brand, 775 F.2d 1460 (11th Cir. 1985); United States v. Cole, 755 F.2d 748 (11th Cir. 1985)); see also United States v. Dreitzler, 577 F.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert W. Garrett
See U.S. v. Davis, supra (shareholder of bank, who also acted as a financial consultant, violated Sec. 657 by advising bank president to purchase securities, when a portion of the purchase price was funneled back to the defendant through the creation of a financial services corporation); United States v. McKinney, 822 F.2d 946, 949 (10th Cir.1987) (defendant, chairman of bank board, violated Sec. 656 by directing his secretary, as sole trustee of his children's trust, to establish a line of credit at the bank and then directed her to borrow on the line of credit for money to refurbish defendan…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
cadc 1993
See, e.g., United States v. Dreitzler, 577 F.2d 539, 552 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 921 , 99 S.Ct. 1246 , 59 L.Ed.2d 473 (1979); United States v. Brown, 456 F.2d 293, 294 (2d Cir.) ("Absent ... a demand [for an immediate ruling] the situation is treated as if the court had denied the motion."), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 910 , 92 S.Ct. 2436 , 32 L.Ed.2d 684 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dale
See, e.g., United States v. Dreitzler, 577 F.2d 539, 552 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 921 , 99 S.Ct. 1246 , 59 L.Ed.2d 473 (1979); United States v. Brown, 456 F.2d 293, 294 (2d Cir.) (“Absent ... a demand [for an immediate ruling] the situation is treated as if the court had denied the motion.”), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 910 , 92 S.Ct. 2436 , 32 L.Ed.2d 684 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ali v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Johnson, 585 F.2d 374, 376 (8th Cir.1978) (where standby counsel was kept from assisting defendant because the defendant chose to ignore him, ineffectiveness claim fails), cert. denied 440 U.S. 921 , 99 S.Ct. 1246 , 59 L.Ed.2d 473 (1979); United States v. Johnson, 434 F.2d 827, 830 (9th Cir.1970) (where defendant “deliberately rejected services of an attorney" and assumed responsibility of counsel, defendant cannot contend that advisory services rendered were inadequate); Carter v. State, 512 N.E.2d 158, 163-64 (Ind.1987) (where defendant had the assistance of co-…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rocky Dale McKeever Brenda Gayle McKeever and Stephen C. Newman
(2×)
See also United States v. Searp, 586 F.2d 1117, 1125-26 (6th Cir.1978) (Merritt, concurring), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 921 , 99 S.Ct. 1247 , 59 L.Ed.2d 474 (1979); United States v. Benford, 457 F.Supp. 589, 595 (E.D.Mich.1978). 20 Despite the above language in Comstock, another post-amendment opinion of this court, United States v. Martin, 600 F.2d 1175 (5th Cir.1979), requires us to apply the Sellers provision-by-provision approach to determine whether the provision in question is governed by Rule 41.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Waldo B. Schoenheit
July 23, 1987); see also United States v. Searp, 586 F.2d 1117, 1122-25 (6th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 921 , 99 S.Ct. 1247 , 59 L.Ed.2d 474 (1979) (requirement of Rule 41(c) to conduct searches during the daytime is procedural rather than a substantive requirement and not required by the fourth amendment).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Balliet
(2×)
See also United States v. Searp, 586 F.2d 1117 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 921 , 99 S.Ct. 1247 , 59 L.Ed.2d 474 (1979) (suppression due to Rules violation not justified absent bad faith conduct on the part of police or prejudice to defendant in sense that search would not have occurred or would not have been as obtrusive).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Fixel
See People v. Meyer, 424 Mich. 143, 156 , 379 N.W.2d 59, 65 (1985). 9 . 507 Pa. at 407 , 490 A.2d at 426 ; see also United States v. Searp, 586 F.2d 1117, 1123 (6th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 921 , 99 S.Ct. 1247 , 59 L.Ed.2d 474 (1979); Commonwealth v. Musi, 486 Pa. 102, 115 , 404 A.2d 378, 385 (1979) ("A rule of exclusion is properly employed where the objection goes to the question of the reliability of the challenged evidence or reflects intolerable government conduct which is widespread and cannot otherwise be controlled.”) (citations omitted). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Rhys Comstock
See, e.g., United States v. Searp, 586 F.2d 1117, 1125-26 (6th Cir.1978) (concurring opinion), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 921 , 99 S.Ct. 1247 , 59 L.Ed.2d 474 (1979); United States v. Bedford, 519 F.2d 650 , 654 n. 1, 656 n. 14 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1120 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976); United States v. Benford, 457 F.Supp. 589, 595 (E.D.Mich.1978) (state warrants applied for and obtained by state officers not governed by Rule 41 notwithstanding federal participation).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gray
See, e.g., United States v. Dreitzler, 577 F.2d 539 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 921 , 99 S.Ct. 1246 , 59 L.Ed.2d 473 ; United States v. Dior, 671 F.2d 351 (9th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Mason
See also United States v. Searp, 586 F.2d 1117 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 440 U.S. 921 , 99 S.Ct. 1247 , 59 L.Ed.2d 474 (1979) (suppression due to Rules violation not justified absent bad faith conduct on the part of police or prejudice to defendant in sense that search would not have occurred or would not have been as obtrusive).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Clifton Gene Gibbons
See also United States v. Searp, 586 F.2d 1117, 1121 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 921 , 99 S.Ct. 1247 , 59 L.Ed.2d 474 .
Harris
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 78-5783.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1979.
Published
C. A. 6th-Cir. Certiorari denied.