green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
13.9 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case ·
“A mere shuffling of personnel in an otherwise on-going operation with an apparent continuity will not, alone suffice to create multiple conspiracies.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Brady is not a discovery rule, but a rule of fairness and minimum prosecuto-rial obligation.”
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Koloske
But cf. United States v. Cobb, 588 F.2d 607 (8th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 (1979) (trial court should be afforded the opportunity to rule after facts have been developed at trial); Houston v. State, 638 S.W.2d 160 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982) (denial of motion in limine does not preserve error under ER 609 where evidence is admitted at trial without objection).
discussed
Cited "but see"
26 Fair empl.prac.cas. 124, 25 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,789 Tommie W. Taylor, Larry C. Peyton, James H. Bibbs, Ike Bolden, Virginia Burke, Bowman Burns, Jr., Fred Donley, Ray Jackson, Ray Kennard, Will Simmons, William Walker, James Walters, Jr., Cato Conley, Joseph Harris and Earl Jones, Godfrey Hill v. Teletype Corporation, Tommie W. Taylor Virginia S. Burke Earl Jones and William Jones Walker v. Teletype Corporation
But see also United States v. Miller, 588 F.2d 1256, 1261 (9th Cir. 1978) (enforcing "obey the law" injunction in Interstate Commerce Act case), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Taylor v. Teletype Corp.
But see also United States v. Miller, 588 F.2d 1256, 1261 (9th Cir. 1978) (enforcing “obey the law” injunction in Interstate Commerce Act case), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Causey
brady is not a discovery rule, but a rule of fairness and minimum prosecuto-rial obligation.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Edgar Allen Gibson and Leslie Gibson v. American Bankers Insurance Company
in sum, federal law controls disputes over the coverage of insurance policies issued pursuant to the ....
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Paul GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
on these facts they invoke the defense of necessity or 'choice of evils,' traditionally a branch of the common-law doctrine of justification.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Lorenzo
a mere shuffling of personnel in an otherwise on-going operation with an apparent continuity will not, alone suffice to create multiple conspiracies.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Nakashian
brady is not a discovery rule, but a rule of fairness and minimum prosecutorial obligation.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Parish of St. Bernard
(2×)
Our quest for Congress’ intent must begin with the Supreme Court's warning that in cases where the statutes and legislative history are silent on the question of private remedy, “implying a private right of action on the basis of congressional silence is a hazardous enterprise, at best.” Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington, supra, 422 U.S. at 571 , 99 S.Ct. at 2486.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Parish of St. Bernard, Police Jury of the Parish of St. Bernard, Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, Fosco Enterprises, Inc., Travelers Insurance Co., Parish of Jefferson and Jefferson Parish Council, Regent Development Corp., Jefferson Levee District, Pontchatrain Levee District, Joseph F. Varisco, Jr., and Terry Tedesco, Inc., J.J. Krebs and Sons, Inc., United States of America v. The Parish of Jefferson
(2×)
See California v. Sierra Club, 451 U.S. 287 , 101 S.Ct. 1775, 1779 , 68 L.Ed.2d 101 (1981); Rogers v. Frito Lay, Inc., 611 F.2d 1074, 1078 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 889 , 101 S.Ct. 246 , 66 L.Ed.2d 115 (1980). 31 Our quest for Congress' intent must begin with the Supreme Court's warning that in cases where the statutes and legislative history are silent on the question of private remedy, "implying a private right of action on the basis of congressional silence is a hazardous enterprise, at best." Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington, supra, 422 U.S. at 571 , 99 S.Ct. at 2486.
discussed
Cited "see"
McCoy v. Commissioner of Public Safety
(2×)
See State v. Singleton, 174 Conn. 112, 115 , 384 A.2d 334 (1977), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1425 , 59 L.Ed.2d 635 (1979); State v. Englehart, 158 Conn. 117, 119 , 256 A.2d 231 (1969); State v. DeCoster, 147 Conn. 502, 504 , 162 A.2d 704 (1960); State v. McDonough, 129 Conn. 483, 484 , 29 A.2d 582 (1942).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bennett
See United States v. Cobb, 588 F.2d 607, 612-13 (8th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wright v. State
Smith v. State, 857 S.W.2d 71, 75 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1993, pet. ref'd); accord United States v. Miller, 588 F.2d 1256, 1264 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979) (indigent defendant must await the event of Ms being held beyond Ms sentence to assert equal protection claim).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Paul GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant
See United States v. Richardson, 588 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979) ("On these facts they invoke the defense of necessity or ‘choice of evils,’ traditionally a branch of the common-law doctrine of justification.”); Wayne R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Smoak v. Independent Fire Insurance Co.
(2×)
See West v. Harris, 573 F.2d 873, 877 (5th Cir.1978) (“In unambiguous terms the policy provides that the defendant ‘shall not be hable for loss ... by ... erosion, earthquake, landslide or any other earth movement except such mudslides as are covered under the peril of flood.’ ”), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 1424 , 59 L.Ed.2d 635 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coble v. Maloney
See State v. Singleton, 174 Conn. 112, 115-16 , 384 A.2d 334 (1977), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S. Ct. 1425 , 59 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Buffett v. Jaramillo
Similarly, a leading case holding that a motion in limine may sometimes preserve an issue for appeal distinguishes between occasions when an objection at trial would be akin to a formal exception that serves no real purpose and when a trial objection would call "the court's attention to a matter it need consider." American Home Assurance Co. v. Sunshine Supermarket, 753 F.2d 321, 324 (3d Cir. 1985); see United States v. Cobb, 588 F.2d 607, 610-11 (8th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979) (when issue not raised at trial, appellate court will review merit…
discussed
Cited "see"
Buffett v. Jaramillo
Similarly, a leading case holding that a motion in limine may sometimes preserve an issue for appeal distinguishes between occasions when an objection at trial would be akin to a formal exception that serves no real purpose and when a trial objection would call “the court’s attention to a matter it need consider.” American Home Assurance Co. v. Sunshine Supermarket, 753 F.2d 321, 324 (3d Cir. 1985); see United States v. Cobb, 588 F.2d 607, 610-11 (8th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979) (when issue not raised at trial, appellate court will review…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. J & T Coal, Inc.
See U.S. v. Parker, 582 F.2d 953 , 954 n. 2 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 1424 , 59 L.Ed.2d 635 (1979). 8 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Geraldine Tinson
See United States v. Miller, 588 F.2d 1256 , 1266 & n. 7 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rajindar K. Maniktala
See United States v. Starusko, 729 F.2d 256, 262 (3rd Cir.1984) (“Unlike Rule 16 and the Jenks Act, however, Brady ‘is not a discovery rule, but a rule of fairness and minimum prosecutorial obligation’ ” and is not violated unless the government’s nondisclosure infringes upon a defendant’s right to a fair trial.) (quoting United States v. Beasley, 576 F.2d 626, 630 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979)); see also United States v. Thevis, 84 F.R.D. 47, 50 (N.D.Ga.1979) (“Not only the scope of disclosure, but the timing of the allowed di…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Cuascut
See United States v. Miller, 588 F.2d 1256, 1264 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979); and In re Roblin Industries, Inc., 52 B.R. 241, 143 (Bankr.W.D.N.Y.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lovern v. United States
See United States v. Beasley, 576 F.2d 626, 630 (5th Cir.1978) (recognizing that differing standards under Brady and Jencks Act may appear counter-intuitive, but justifying the difference on the ground that the statute is a “blanket disclosure requirement”), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979). 15 Given the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Schell , therefore, this Court must find that the Jencks Act violations resulted in “no prejudice” to conclude that nondisclosure was harmless error.
examined
Cited "see"
Gulf Oil Corp. v. Commissioner
(4×)
See Steere Tank Lines, Inc. v. U.S ., 577 F.2d 279 (5th Cir. 1978) , cert. denied , 440 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 1424 , 59 L.Ed.2d 634 (1979) .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Luis Ramirez, Leopoldo Alegria-Valencia, Antonio G. Rodriguez
See United States v. Beasley, 576 F.2d 626, 630 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Adolf Meyer
See United States v. Miller, 588 F.2d 1256, 1264 (9th Cir.) (trial judge should ensure that stipulation is voluntary), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Louis Branco
United States v. Dubrofsky, 581 F.2d 208, 215 (9th Cir. 1978); see United States v. Miller, 588 F.2d 1256, 1266-67 (9th Cir.1978) (Miller), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979); Perri, 513 F.2d at 574-75 ; Weston, 448 F.2d at 631-33 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Beech Aircraft Corporation v. United States
See Steere Tank Lines, Inc. v. United States, 577 F.2d 279, 280 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 1424 , 59 L.Ed.2d 634 (1979); Commissioner v. Treganowan, 183 F.2d 288, 291 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 853 , 71 S.Ct. 82 , 95 L.Ed. 625 (1950).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark Edward Bradley
See United States v. Cobb, 588 F.2d 607, 613 (8th Cir. 1978) cert. denied 440 U.S. 947 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Persico
Brady is not to be utilized as a discovery device to “supply a defendant with all evidence in the government’s possession which might conceivably assist the preparation of his defense, but to assure that the defendant will not be denied access to exculpatory evidence only known to the government.” Id. at 619; see United States v. Beasley, 576 F.2d 626, 630 (5th Cir.1978) (“Brady is not a discovery rule, but a rule of fairness and minimum prosecutorial obligation.”) (citing United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 107 , 96 S.Ct. 2392, 2399 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976)), cert. denied, 440 U.S. …
discussed
Cited "see"
Mobil Oil Corp. v. United States
See Steere Tank Lines, Inc. v. United States, 577 F.2d 279, 280 (5th Cir., 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 1424 , 59 L.Ed.2d 634 (1979); Spring Canyon Coal v. Commissioner, 43 F.2d 78 (10th Cir., 1930), cert. denied, 284 U.S. 654 , 52 S.Ct. 33 , 76 L.Ed. 555 (1931).
cited
Cited "see"
Quesada v. Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency
See West v. Harris, 573 F.2d 873 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 1424 , 59 L.Ed.2d 635 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
G. Frank Quesada v. Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency
(2×)
See Gibson v. Secretary of U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development, 479 F.Supp. 3 (M.D.Pa.1978) (loss proximately caused by flood even though flood water did not actually enter insured's home). 19 In support of its second argument, that the "earth movement" exclusion applies, 4 appellant urges us to follow West v. Harris, 573 F.2d 873 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 1424 , 59 L.Ed.2d 635 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Crawford Fitting Co. v. United States
See Steere Tank Lines, Inc. v. U.S., 577 F.2d 279 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 1424 , 59 L.Ed.2d 634 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
David Dene Martin v. Ross Maggio, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, and William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana
Accord United States v. Beasley, 576 F.2d 626, 631-32 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979); United States v. Lutz, 621 F.2d 940, 948 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 859 , 101 S.Ct. 160 , 66 L.Ed.2d 75 (1981); United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 81 , 77 n. 111 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 2641 , 53 L.Ed.2d 250 (1977); United States v. Carrasco, 537 F.2d 372 , 377 n. 3 (9th Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank J. Robertson
See United States v. Cobb, 588 F.2d 607 (8th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Blasco
See United States v. Beasley, 576 F.2d 626, 630 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Blasco
See United States v. Beasley, 576 F.2d 626, 630 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979). 37 Appellants further contend that the government's failure to apprise them that one of the government's witnesses, Geike, who was responsible for collecting the clothing of four of the defendants for fiber analysis, had been discharged from his job as a jailer due to his negligence.
discussed
Cited "see"
Elizabeth Beverly, Etc. v. John W. MacY Jr., Elizabeth Beverly, Etc. v. National Flood Insurers Association
(2×)
Accord West v. Harris, 573 F.2d 873 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 1424 , 59 L.Ed.2d 635 (1979); Drewitt v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 539 F.2d 496 (5th Cir.1976); Gement v. Allstate Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert A. Wise v. Richard Anthony Bravo, the City of Pueblo, and Pueblo Police Department
(2×)
See Reimer v. Short, 578 F.2d 621 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1425 , 59 L.Ed.2d 635 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wayne Ernest Barker v. Ben Norman and Jack Ballas
(2×)
See Reimer v. Short, 578 F.2d 621, 628-29 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1425 , 59 L.Ed.2d 635 (1979); Clayton v. Shaw, 548 F.2d 1155 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 873 , 98 S.Ct. 220 , 54 L.Ed.2d 153 (1977); Snell v. Short, 544 F.2d 1289, 1291 (5th Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Van Howell v. Joe D. Tanner, Individually and as Commissioner of Department of Natural Resources
See Reimer v. Short, 578 F.2d 621, 625 (5th Cir. 1978) cert. denied 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1425 , 59 L.Ed.2d 635 (1979); Locust v. DeGiovanni, 485 F.Supp. 551, 552 (E.D.Pa.1980). 7 Summary judgment was also authorized for Sheriff Leon Raulerson.
discussed
Cited "see"
Carnation Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Steere Tank Lines, Inc. v. United States, 577 F.2d 279, 280 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 1424 , 59 L.Ed.2d 634 (1979); Spring Canyon Coal v. Commissioner, 43 F.2d 78 (10th Cir. 1930), cert. denied, 284 U.S. 654 , 53 S.Ct. 33 , 76 L.Ed. 555 (1931).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Allen Powers William Nichols, Contemnor/appellant
See United States v. Miller, 588 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Arthur C. Payne, Cross-Appellee v. Panama Canal Company, Cross-Appellant
See West v. Harris, 573 F.2d 873, 883 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 1424 , 59 L.Ed.2d 635 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Friedman v. South Carolina Insurance
(2×)
See, e.g., West v. Harris, 573 F.2d 873 (5th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 1424 , 59 L.Ed.2d 635 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Travelers Insurance v. Liljeberg Enterprises, Inc.
See, e.g., West v. Harris, 573 F.2d 873, 882 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.s. 946, 99 S.Ct. 1424 , 59 L.Ed.2d 635 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Windyceslau D. Lorenzo, United States of America v. Roger Elvick, United States of America v. Nathan K. Brown, United States of America v. Ron Knutt, United States of America v. Thomas Porter
See Guzman, 852 F.2d at 1121 ; see also United States v. Richardson, 588 F.2d 1235, 1241 (9th Cir.1978) (that two conspiracy counts alleged the same overt acts and identical co-conspirators did not establish the same conspiracy as a matter of law), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979); but see United States v. Bryan, 896 F.2d 68, 71-72 (5th Cir.1990) ("A mere shuffling of personnel in an otherwise on-going operation with an apparent continuity will not, alone suffice to create multiple conspiracies.").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Laymon
See United States v. Keithan, 751 F.2d 9, 12 (1st Cir.1984); See also, United States v. Richardson, 588 F.2d 1235, 1241 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 , rehearing denied, 441 U.S. 937 , 99 S.Ct. 2064 , 60 L.Ed.2d 667 , (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The United States of America, for the Use of C.J.C., Inc., a New Mexico Corporation v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation and Sandia Corporation, a New Mexico Corporation, D/B/A Sandia National Laboratories, United States of America, for the Use of Hugg Surveying Co., Plaintiff v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants- United States of America, for the Use of Hugg Surveying Co., Plaintiff v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants- the United States of America, for the Use of C.J.C., Inc., a New Mexico Corporation v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants- United States of America, for the Use of Fred Sanchez Construction Company v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants
Co. v. United States, 313 U.S. 289 , 61 S.Ct. 995 , 85 L.Ed. 1361 (1941)) ("In the absence of an applicable federal statute, it is for the federal courts to determine, according to their own criteria, the appropriate measure of damage, expressed in terms of interest, for nonpayment of the amount found to be due."); Pa. Dept. of Public Welfare v. United States, 781 F.2d 334 , 341 (3d Cir.1986) ("Supreme Court has fashioned federal common law that permits [assessment of prejudgment interest] in certain circumstances"); see also West v. Harris, 573 F.2d 873 , 880-84 (5th Cir.1978) (prejudgment in…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Biancone
v.
Pennsylvania
v.
Pennsylvania
No. 78-1101.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 5, 1979.
Published
Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.